SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - Viewpoint: James Bond fails the tech test in Skyfall

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)

- General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)

- - Viewpoint: James Bond fails the tech test in Skyfall (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=200273)

Viewpoint: James Bond fails the tech test in Skyfall

http://i1358.photobucket.com/albums/...89_servers.jpg
In real life Bond's first conversation with Silva might have been hard to hear.

Quote:

As a self-confessed technology geek, there have been numerous occasions when my enjoyment of a movie has been marred by technological impossibilities. For example, Independence Day was ruined for me when Jeff Goldblum used an Apple Mac to transfer a virus to the alien mothership and thus saved mankind, all at a time when it was a miracle if you could get your Mac to talk to a printer via a cable.

Quote:

So, for all you out there with similar sensitivities planning to go and see Skyfall, the latest in the Bond franchise, be warned! I have been to see this movie (expect spoilers below) and if you like your technology on the realistic side then you should see a different show...

One of the most glaring errors occurs in what is perhaps the most crucial scene between the cyber-terrorist bad guy Raoul Silva, played by Javier Bardem, and Bond, who is tied up throughout to a chair.

In the scene, the large room is dominated by the racks of computers that allow Silva to conduct his cyber-attacks.

What is striking to a geek like me however is the complete absence of background noise!

Bond,licence to kill....

Note: 2 December 2012 Last updated at 00:44 GMT

Could it be because real life tech has progressed so much, that we are not impressed by some of the things we saw in skyfall? Not like when we saw a Roger Moore, Bond/ Connery, who had to deal with crappier effects, and more acting to get by.

Yes I said Daniel Craig is a crappy actor.

Loved the Skyfall flick personally, despite it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by soopaman2 (Post 1969506)

Skyfall,is a good kick.

Well I mean, lets be honest here, there is so much tech in our lives that it is hard to impress us.

If you watch the 80s bond movies, back then Q's monochromatic computer was "super high tech" and could impress your average viewer. People in the 80s would probably even be easily impressed by a WYSIWYG text editor like Microsoft word.

Thus of course they would have to exaggerate the technology, or else people won't be impressed at all.

Well,the technology used in films are usually commonplace in my everyday life.

It was still one of the best Bond flicks in my lifetime, I was just simply stating why the tech did not impress,

Daniel Craig is fine, but I am forever expecting Connery or even Brosnan.

I heard Sir Roger Moore very recently on a radio show (Opie and Anthony), he refused to be called sir, he specifically told them to call him Roger, what a stand up guy! He gave insight on being knighted, and how to behave upon recieving the honor, I was impressed.

Classy beyond words.

I can accept almost anything as long as it doesn't drag me out of the story and plant me back in real life. So it's really the quality of the writing and directing that determines how much technical silliness they can get away with. Skyfall passed, great film and a great Bond film.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tchocky (Post 1969663)

Agreed :yep:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tchocky (Post 1969663)

:agree:

Eh, it was a great movie. Finally got to see the Goldfinger Aston Martin DB5's Machine Guns used properly.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cybermat47 (Post 1969961)

Eh, it was a great movie. Finally got to see the Goldfinger Aston Martin DB5's Machine Guns used properly.

It took a long time 48 years since Goldfinger was released in 1964.