A World of Harm for Women
 

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/20/op...for-women.html


Note: October 19, 2012

Opinion column. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Right or wrong.

Needs more binders.

What he has indeed announced he would do, is no opinion, but now historic fact you can quote from the archives. Question is whether or not there are powers fighting him from making his declared plans true.

I'm lazy. Please site where Willard would do these things.

Romney on Roe v Wade:

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2...tive-audience/

Romney on global gag rule, aka Mexico City Policy:

http://www.wptv.com/dpp/news/politic...raws-criticism

It's always about abortion with the neocons. They claim otherwise but it is always about social issues.

not to be rude, but had you been following any of his plans on the critical issues youd wouldnt need to ask that question, as he and the republican party (who honestly make romney a puppet, turning him from his more moderate stance years ago to the ideologies the republican party shares today) have said numerous times that they want to make any abortion illegal and cut any and all funding to planned parenthood and many organizations that promote contraception in people who dont want and cant care for children, especially teens.

Gerald if you keep posting those opinion pieces you should change your Subsim Newsman designation to "Subsim political shill"...:yep:

So if in your mind he's a (lefty) political shill, then that makes you a righty political shill :O:

Let him post those ''opinions''. It's his right to do so.
And one more thing, why don't you post some republican opinions if you think Vendor is biased, to even out the playing field

:agree:

So don't be rude. Understand abortion is not a critical issue for me. Roe v Wade discussions and what any president or would be president has been used fordecades as a tool. In the sense that a candidate will spew out abolishing to energize his base to obtain support and nomination. Others use this piece of legislation to energize opposition to turn support away from a candidate. There is really nothing different here from decades past with the same questions, answers, themes and ideology. What a great time to throw out a article like this when the women's votes(polls) appear to be swinging Willard's way. See this article for what it is. Read what Take posted. Some issues are paramount to some where others are not. Abortion, getting rubbers to kids and making sure women have day after pills is not in the forefront of my concerns.

Smoke and mirrors. In the political game ears need to be tickled. Promises need to be made. It's nothing new. And it won't happen. Social policies, abortion, same sex marriage, etc., never go backwards. People just wouldn't stand for it. That's progress I guess.

The title Subsim Newsman, as Neal handed out for a "decent" time to go back, is a good title, since it refers to news updates, and by chance it will with the political moves, as well as it is about space or another in our everyday life, and with it, I would say that my posts are not intended to profess political color if there is one around here, which I think is, for example, leftists ..... our comitte built on independence.

No I do not, I just think he is has a problem differentiating between news and propaganda. Partisan opinion is not news.

I post my opinions all the time. I just don't pretend that they are "news". He claims to be a "SubSim Newsman", I do not. See the difference?

See my preceding post. You can't truthfully claim to be a newsman if you post propaganda Gerald.