![]() |
Gripen Beats Rafale, Typhoon for Swiss
http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/8122/gripen5.jpg
Quote:
Note: Dec 1, 2011 |
that logo on the side of the gripen there. when i was a kid, it was just a logo, but now in the world of the intertubes...it's an emoticon:shifty:
|
Accounts for three crowns, a weapon tag in Swedish flight ... which was before the internet and emoticon,:yep:
|
|
No trollface then?
All three contenders are a vast step up from the F5 :o, must be nice to finally (eventually) carry more than a few sidewinders or a couple of mavericks. But why do the Swiss need these a/c? To give the pope a flypast? :hmmm: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And the wing-tip pods are white flag dispensers. http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-vU7SecSvRe...-ecoulee-1.jpg |
oooohhhhh F-5s going on the market?
Daddy want.... |
F-5s do look nice, but too small to play in the big leagues, little fuel, fewer armaments. Like a baby Starfighter, but less suicidal.
But they really do look nice. :yep: Edit: Now awaiting TLAM to come along and correct me on fuel quantities... |
http://www.ynet.co.il/PicServer2/010...ostMod1_hx.jpg
F-5 can be upgraded to python/derby/amraam capacity. http://2005.uploaded.fresh.co.il/200...2/21208287.jpg ......... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Those upgrades seem sort of dead end to give clear edge over some soviet time/older air forces. As far as multi-role ability those planes cant be compered but may be good interceptors. |
Quote:
:D |
The Gripen is no match for latest-generation fighters like Eurofighter, F-22, Su-35.
But it is a pretty decent plane for the previous generation of fighters. When it entered service in the late 80s, it had probably the most modern cockpit of the pack. For the Swiss, it is a good choice. It'S still a very good plane, taken for itself. It is easy to maintain, and maintenance is said to be taught easily to recruits. It is very robust in extremely cold climate and winter conditions. It needs very short runways only. It has multi-role capacity. It helps them to save money in the buying, so they can avoid jumping on the money train of military developement. It fits into the needs of their terrain, military infrastructure and defence doctrine. It is no American, Russian or NATO-producer. All these are advantages in the Swiss' favour. For some, the Typhoon would be the better choice (but too expensive). I think for the Swiss the Gripen indeed is the better choice. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.