SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - Russia: Israeli threat of strikes on Iran 'a mistake'

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)

- General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)

- - Russia: Israeli threat of strikes on Iran 'a mistake' (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=189416)

Russia: Israeli threat of strikes on Iran 'a mistake'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-15617657

Note: 7 November 2011 Last updated at 09:48 GMT

Russia is Irans butt-buddy. If I remember right, they have a military alliance. They also help them with other things.
http://www.irantracker.org/foreign-r...eign-relations

Deep down inside it is looking almost like a war by proxy. Them and China seem to do all they can to tick off America, including bullying Israel.

Now don't lay into me on what Israel deserves. I can go on for 4 or 5 posts on what Israel has done wrong. But this more reeks at a poke at the US, who protects Israel.

If Russia, jumped on Israel, America would be there. And then China will defend their neighbor, plus they hate us anyways.. Easy decision.

Then it gets bloody, thanks to a man who looks like a monkey, and a people who think only they are gods chosen people.

No, as far as I know, Russia have been looking to distance themselves from Iran for the last few years. They've loudly and publically cancelled several military contracts in the last two years, and have generally been distancing themselves. Their military cooperation is completely frozen and in fact much has been done by Russia to set up military plans and infrastructure for facing Iran as a potentially hostile nation. Russia is just playing politics, trying to seem like the 'voice of reason' and score points with other, more neutrally-disposed countries. While they certainly had a positive relationship with Iran a decade ago, right now their relationship has cooled. They do, however, still stand to lose important trade if they get too 'cold' about Iran.

If you look at other recent situations, be they Libya or Syria or Egypt, Lavrov has been recycling the same "let's sit down, no armed hostility!" line over and over. More than anything, Russia just doesn't like the US and its allies throwing their weight around. It doesn't, however, really care about Iran past a certain extent and could definitely live without the Iranian regime.

When does Israel ever listen to outside advice, they done it before by bombing Iraq's Nuclear industry, and may do the same with Iran after it seems Israel now has a ballistic missile capability, things are certainly hotting up in the region.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CCIP (Post 1782667)

Maskirovka?:hmmm::D

What do you think?

I can't see Russia going out on a limb for anyone other than themselves!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by soopaman2 (Post 1782663)

Then it gets bloody, thanks to a man who looks like a monkey, and a people who think only they are gods chosen people.

You do have a way with words don't you :shifty:...

Quote:

It doesn't, however, really care about Iran past a certain extent and could definitely live without the Iranian regime.

Quote:

I can't see Russia going out on a limb for anyone other than themselves!!

That's about how I see it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbuna (Post 1782753)

What do you think?

I can't see Russia going out on a limb for anyone other than themselves!!

So true!

I decided to go and dig around the Russian media today to see what their position on this might be. Some interesting findings!

This seems to be representative of a moderate, realistic Russian perspective on the situation:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lenta.ru

The Russians are hoping for multi-billion contracts in military and nuclear (!) spheres of cooperation, and the Chinese are dependent on Iranian oil exports. Besides, they don't particularly believe the findings of the IAEA, and both Moscow and Beijing are not convinced of the nuclear aggressiveness of Tehran.

But these are traditional allies of Iran. What's more interesting is that the Americans, traditionally having a hard stance on Iran, also don't want to punish Iran too harshly. The reason is the same - money. The US have refused unilateral sanctions against Iran's central bank, as those could affect the global supply of oil. That would cause oil prices to skyrocket, pushing the global economy into the abyss on the edge of which it is now standing. In an election year, Barack Obama would not want a global economic disaster - his chances of getting re-elected are not very high as it is.

[...]

In Israel, they're watching the bloodthirsty proclamations from Tehran about destroying the "Zionist formation". Those kinds of conversations will make anyone nervous. [...] The country's leadership faces a difficult decision: what to do about a neighbour who instead of greeting you says "You don't have long left, you bastard", and in his spare time is busy building a rifle for "peaceful purposes"? The police refuse to do anything - formally, the neighbour is not guilty of anything. Besides, some of the policemen are his friends and business partners. And then, one day it turns out that the neighbour has already completed his rifle and, continuing to seethe hate towards you, has gone to get ammo for it.

[...]

The question is what [Israel] can do now. There is no hope for the UN Security Council - there will be no sanctions that could affect oil supply. So, however you put it - there are no sanctions possible that could stop Ahmadinejad from building nuclear weapons. [...] Perhaps there are some sort of peaceful means of convincing Iran to stop their nuclear development, but those are difficult to see now. Even a sudden death of Ahmadinejad and/or Ayatollah Khamenei would not change anything: the hatred towards Israel in Iran is shared by even the most dissenting opposition. Iranian society is in consensus [over Israel].

So, Israel cannot allow an Iranian nuclear weapon to be produced under any circumstances. Noone and nothing, it seems, can stop Iran from making that happen. So, now everyone is guessing what will really take place. The riddle is along the following lines: "What happens when an unstoppable force meets with an immovable obstacle?" In analyzing the current situation of the Iran-Israel opposition that, in all probability, means inevitable war.

So, I think it's safe to say that for all the Foreign Minister's proclamations, Russia realizes as well as anyone that it's not a "mistake" - it's an inevitability. However, they're no more interested in losing billions and facing a global economic collapse than anybody else. So, they'll play their words and stave it off while they can. However I think calling it a "proxy" conflict is ludicrous - Russia will have no more part of it than the US is willing to play a part on Israel's behalf. No presidency in the US, by the way, would change that - any US president who would be willing to let his country bear a global economic disaster for Israel's sake isn't serving his country, but is serving the Israel lobby. Or is an idiot. So, don't go pointing fingers at Russia or Obama in this case - neither, rationally, has anything to gain for their country from supporting this collision of interests. If you wish to blame anything, blame the global economy for tying everybody's hands. Otherwise while we're addicted to the oil market, noone can really do much of anything without dealing with consequences at home.

Quote:

In Israel, they're watching the bloodthirsty proclamations from Tehran about destroying the "Zionist formation". Those kinds of conversations will make anyone nervous. [...] The country's leadership faces a difficult decision: what to do about a neighbour who instead of greeting you says "You don't have long left, you bastard", and in his spare time is busy building a rifle for "peaceful purposes"? The police refuse to do anything - formally, the neighbour is not guilty of anything. Besides, some of the policemen are his friends and business partners. And then, one day it turns out that the neighbour has already completed his rifle and, continuing to seethe hate towards you, has gone to get ammo for it.

This one puts it quite well.

Is this article available in english or did you translate it yourself?

I translated it myself; the original in Russian is here: http://lenta.ru/articles/2011/11/09/nukes/

It has a neat conclusion, too...

Quote:

By the way, the classic answer to that riddle is "The immovable obstacle will move, the unstoppable force will stop." So, following that logic, Israel will lose the war, but Iran's nuclear development will also stop. But that's in theory - and life, as we know, is full of surprises.

Let's hope it doesn't get to that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CCIP (Post 1784272)

I translated it myself; the original in Russian is here: http://lenta.ru/articles/2011/11/09/nukes/

It has a neat conclusion, too...

Let's hope it doesn't get to that.

AMEN

Quote:

Originally Posted by CCIP (Post 1784252)

Otherwise while we're addicted to the oil market, noone can really do much of anything without dealing with consequences at home.

This is sort of lose/lose situation.
Any military action against Iran will cause big mess in ME and prices of oil to go high-the banking issue is not the issue i think...
Letting Iran continue with its plans imay have even bigger consequences but simply later in time.
I'm not sure about the Iranian consensus about Israel......uprising in Iran would be welcomed....

Leave it to IOsrael and Iran to tough it out...I know who my money would be on.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MH (Post 1784321)

I'm not sure about the Iranian consensus about Israel......uprising in Iran would be welcomed....

It would certainly slow things down and buy everyone more time, but that's still a tricky situation. I agree that the outcome is not so guaranteed (and I say that as someone who has several friends from/in Iran, who do not support the regime there nor bear much ill will towards Israel), but there is always a chance that it will be replaced by an element no less aggressive and dangerous. In particular, the military, or rather the Republican Guard, have been coming to the forefront in Iran. It is conceivable that they might have an agenda that's quite different from the current theocracy... but then does an Iran run by a military dictatorship a better alternative? It may make Israel safer than now, but on the other hand the rest of the region would probably be worse off for it.