Obama gets more and more dangerous..
 

So now under the guise of "We Can't Wait", Obama is "bypassing" Congress by using "Executive Actions" to implement his "plans". Yet another example of his disdain for the constitution.Dangerous times my friends...

To the left wingers....yes I know other Presidents used the same for some things and it was not right then either.Seems that obama intends to pass his wasteful and ridiculous "jobs" bill by abusing his executive powers, can't recall any president in recent memory who has tried to bypass the constitutional role of congress in order to get what he wants.I could be wrong as I don't have time to check at the moment so if I am, well it was wrong then also as I said in the begining.

I used to be a left winger but now im a NON-winger, What has he forced through now? Linky please...

You must mean the inadequate jobs bill the Repugs have been holding off and threatening to fillibuster.

It may not be a good bill, but it is way more than the repugs have tried...

They ran on jobs, won then decided deficit cutting is better. So When Obammy tries to work on jobs they screw their constituents just to make the president into Jimmy Carter.

I am not an Obama fan, but at least he is trying...

What has your right wing owned house done..Besides fillibuster in order to make Obama a one term president?

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sen-mccon...olitical-goal/

So why is Mitch repeatedly elected?

People are knee jerk morons...Thats why

I'm in the south 40 wing.


The new bill raises taxes. Does not cut enough government spending. Repubs said they do not want to raise taxes. They are standing to that statement.

Not true, repubs made a bill. No one showed up to read it apparently.

So is everyone else. However, it would seem both parties have no respect for the man.

The same crap his own left wing buddies did the first two years.

Same reason Reid and Pelosi are re-elected

People have selective memory.

I would like too know what kind of society these nutters in DC think is going to rise from the ruins of this great country, I shutter at the thought, that they have to destroy something to make it beautiful in their eyes, it's sorta like dying then maybe you go to heaven too them that's a bet I'm not willing to take yet, if you think what you see the ows doing is something, wait till those welfare checks run out, peoples retirements dissappear, food stamps are worthless and the unemployment checks quit come-ing, 40 plus million hungry people going out of their minds, 15 million illegal aleins thinking they want a piece of the pie, and god only knows what is going on south of the border, do the elites think they are going to be immune to the madness, well if they are dumb enough to leave a light on at night they will be found out, funny how light attracts things. I'm to old for this crap .

Why are you all surprised about Obama issuing executive orders? Almost all the Presidents in the last 100 or so years have done so. Reagan was a big proponent of executive orders and let's not forget the mini-storm of executive orders Bush II promulgated in the final year of his term and for the benefit of fat cat interests. Like the Who song says, "Here comes the new boss, same as the old boss..."...

I really like you alot Mr. Warhawk, your one of the few who sees this as it is.

Obammy had 2 years, but was cursed by DINOs crossing partisan lines to "stick it to the rookie"

But once Boner took over.... No blaming dems then...
The man refuses to compromise..Thats good? Thats really good to you, a hardliner?

We got downgraded because of his shenanigans. Not like it matters... Moodys, Fitch, etc don't have an army or 300 million citizens.

Anything to make the Caucas-african a one term wonder right?

From what I have read:

US President: can make executive orders, fast but weak.

US Congress: makes laws, is slower, but more powerful than El Presidente; can tolerate executive orders by the President by doing nothing but can kill it by responding with making laws.

US Supreme Court: even slower, but can pull out the nuke. Can nuke executive orders and defines the legal frames for making laws by the Congress on the base of the US Constitutional law, so no reintroducing black slavery in the US e.g.

It that it the hierarchy in the US then I think, you can't say El Presidente is "bypassing" the Congress, you could better say, the Congess is "weak" or "slow" or something like that if that is what you feel like it is.

Can you sue the US President for violating your constitutional rights by making executive orders that affect your status as a US citizen or your status as a member of the US Congress?

You know - when your informed you tend to debate rather well. Unfortunately, you are either uninformed - or choosing to ignore facts.

What has the House done? Passed the following which all relate to the economic conditions of this country - and which the Democraticly controlled Senate refuse to take up.

H.R. 872, the Reducing Regulatory Burdens Act
• Introduced by Rep. Bob Gibbs (OH) on March 2, 2011
• Passed the House by a vote of 292-130 on March 31, 2011
• Senate has taken no action to date

H.R. 910, the Energy Tax Prevention Act
• Introduced by Rep. Fred Upton (MI) on March 3, 2011
• Passed the House by a vote of 255-172 on April 7, 2011
• Senate has taken no action to date

H.R. 37, a Resolution of disapproval regarding the FCC's regulation of the Internet and broadband industry practices
• Introduced by Rep. Greg Walden (OR) on February 16, 2011
• Passed the House by a vote of 240 to 179 on April 8, 2011
• Senate has taken no action to date

H.R. 72, a Resolution to direct committees to inventory and review existing, pending, and proposed regulations and order from agencies of the federal government, particularly with respect to their effect on jobs and economic growth
• Introduced by Rep. Pete Sessions (TX) on February 8, 2011
• Passed the House by a vote of 391 to 28 on February 11, 2011
• The Senate has not directed their committees to take such action

H.R. 1230, Restarting American Offshore Leasing Now Act
• Introduced by Rep. Doc Hastings (WA) on March 29, 2011
• Passed the House by a vote of 266-149 on May 5, 2011
• Senate has taken no action to date

H.R. 1229, Putting the Gulf of Mexico Back to Work Act
• Introduced by Rep. Doc Hastings (WA) on March 29, 2011
• Passed the House by a vote of 263-163 on May 11, 2011
• Senate has taken no action to date

H.R. 1231, Reversing President Obama's Offshore Moratorium Act
• Introduced by Rep. Doc Hastings (WA) on March 29, 2011
• Passed the House by a vote of 243-179 on May 12, 2011
• Senate has taken no action to date

H.Con.Res. 34, a Resolution establishing the budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2012 and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2013 through 2021
• Introduced by Rep. Paul Ryan (WI) on April 11, 2011
• Passed the House by a vote of 235-193 on April 15, 2011
• Senate has not yet considered a budget of their own

HR2021 The Jobs and Energy Permitting Act

HR2018 Clean Water Cooperative Federalism Act of 2011

HR1315 Consumer Financial Protection and Soundness Act

HR1938 North American-made Energy Security Act

HR2587 Protecting Jobs from Government Interference Act

HR2401 Transparency in Regulatory Analysis of Impacts on the Nation

HR2681 Cement Sector Regulatory Relief Act

HR2250 EPA Regulatory Relief Act

HR2273 Coal Residuals Reuse and Management Act

HR2433 Veterans Opportunity to Work Act

HR674 To Amend the Internal Revenue Code to Repeal the imposition of 3 percent witholding on certain paymentsmade to vendors by government entities.

The Senate won't touch these. The House has done a heck of a lot more than the Administration or Harry Reid to fix this economic mess. Funny - you don't hear that in media. But the data is there. Go look it up.

Don't go to a partisan website - left or right. Go to the government website and search these - find the actual data - not how it is spun - and then tell me who is doing what - and who isnt.

OH EM GEE!

Did the truth actually silence political talking points for once?

(lol I was away for the weekend)

How condescending. I bet your real proud of yourself when you typed that, do I enrage you that much sir?

Good for them, but it isn't helping anyone out here in the real world. Seems like alot of corporate welfare acts me.

I still want to know where the "jobs' are that they ran on.

I hate both sides ok. (sheesh how many times do I have to say that, and how many more times have I bashed Obama than defended him?)

So whats your view on Mitch McConnel and open obstructionism? That is good?


You took one sentence then nitpicked it, then when I didn't respond you tried to talk down to me..

Right wing/ left wing rigidity is the problem. Not Obama

Look past partisan crap. I can. I am most likely voting republican.

(I apologize if my previous post was rhetorical, it was. I am trying to move beyond that, and be honest with myself and the needs of the country.)

Trying to answer your last question: NIXON v. FITZGERALD =

Yes (The President has absolute immunity). The Court held that the President "is entitled to absolute immunity from damages liability predicated on his official acts." This sweeping immunity, argued Justice Powell, was a function of the "President's unique office, rooted in the constitutional tradition of separation of powers and supported by our history."

parenthesis added by me because of the context

BUT: CLINTON v. JONES =

No. In a unanimous opinion, the Court held that the Constitution does not grant a sitting President immunity from civil litigation except under highly unusual circumstances. After noting the great respect and dignity owed to the Executive office, the Court held that neither separation of powers nor the need for confidentiality of high-level information can justify an unqualified Presidential immunity from judicial process. While the independence of our government's branches must be protected under the doctrine of separation of powers, the Constitution does not prohibit these branches from exercising any control over one another. This, the Court added, is true despite the procedural burdens which Article III jurisdiction may impose on the time, attention, and resources of the Chief Executive.

So the answer is YES and NO. :rotfl2:

An example of an executive order: #9066, the historians #1 president FDR (besides Lincoln), lead to Japanese Americans to be locked up in interment camps during the war.

As you stated before, Congress can block it by passing legislation OR the even easier way: to not fund it at all.

Though I take issue with your opinion about the president being the one who is innocent in all of this: he did in fact bypass the legislative process that was set forth by the constitution by issuing the executive order in the first place.

Dog crap is still dog crap, whether served on a paper plate or fine china.

Most conservatives loath McConnel, so yes, I do too. Come up with a better one. :yeah:

Oh, ok.

But you just said....the other....but...


:doh:

We could have avoided all of this if the press asked the bamster some tough questions in the primaries, he would have been exposed for the marxist noob that he is, and he'd be back in Chicago, organizun' riff-raff. Although, on a side note HRC would have been no different.:doh:

I think the problem with the left is that they are crippled by PCness. They make decisions based on feelings/ emotions.

It's more importnant to have a president who is [insert minority here], than actual skills.

Kinda miss Bubba now.