Murdoch scandal: News of the World whistleblower Sean Hoare found dead
 

http://coto2.wordpress.com/2011/07/1...ng-found-dead/


But how can the police say the death is not suspicious when they haven't been able to tell exactly how he died? A bit too early to take the assumption that it is not suspicious to me. Unknown is not not suspicious. In fact it is strange and given the timing and circumstances pertaining his recent activities you could say suspicious.

Another Dr Kelly I'd wager...

Yeah I can see the pattern too. This indeed reminds me of Dr. Kelly.

There's no justification to his assassination. It was an assassination as what fact that has been released yet the details now classified.

Wouldn't bet against it

Vendor and Feuer Frei! are suspiciously quiet at the moment! Sacked by Murdoch no doubt. :o

Whilst conspiracy theories will always take place in such circumstances, it is just possible that the pressure of this over the last few years, along with a known drink/drugs problem that it could be suicide or death by misadventure!

Although I do believe Kelly was 'got at', this just may be not. Post mortem should tell more. :dead:

I'm sure this is all just a coincidence, because at no point in history has a powerful man had someone killed to protect his interests.

Once again, guys, I'm having that problem where I seem to be deaf in my right ear!!!

That bloke who attacked Murdoch deserves a pint or 2 :haha:

This story just keeps on giving.
Now we have the police saying the Prime Ministers staff told them to drop any references to phone hacking from their PM briefings.
So Dave wanted some plausible deniability so he could say that he was not told about issues.....but forgot to get rid of the message that told the police to not tell him of things he "didn't know":rotfl2:

I think he drowned in a swimming pool. :yep:

Just like Brian Jones!!! :D

You know, I'm starting to think maybe I'm not deaf in my right ear, but gosh darn it, I don't seem to be hearing anything from that side!! I guess I'll keep bumping this thread, giggling like a school girl, until I do!!! :har:

Speaking of my right ear there was one incident which I will not forget easily.

One night I was trying a peculiar simple prayer. It is done by invoking the name Jesus over and over and over and over. Doesn't have to be loud or even doesn't have to be audible at all.

I tried this one night on my bed just before going to sleep not expecting anything but something came when I was on the verge of falling to sleep.

I didn't dare to open my eyes. But I heard a very loud noise which I can only say that it sounded like a very very strong windstorm(so strong it was scary). it was the strongest sound of wind I have ever heard. I was afraid it would wake the whole neighborhood. Funnily I could tell that it was damn loud on my right ear so I was picking it mostly on my right ear. Whatever it was I believe it was present to my right side of the bed. Couldn't remember anything else afterwards but enough to know it wasn't a dream.

The next day I realized no one even at my house heard anything. I came to the conclusion I was the only one who heard it. Now many people who are unfamiliar may think I was probably hallucinating but I wasn't. I told my mom about it and another person who often practiced the same prayer sometimes hear the exact mighty wind noise. In fact sometimes it is proceeded with a voice saying specific verses from the bible. Many monastic monk practice the same prayer too in meditative stance and many experience the same thing.

From then on I suspect that when the bible tells the story of the Pentacost which is the descend of the holy spirit preceded by the sound of the mighty wind and fire apparition descending on each person in the house I am quite sure that nobody else outside that particular house heard a thing. The sound of the mighty wind could only be heard by its intended audience. You could even be in the same room and not heard a thing.:doh:

But because I'm unsure what it was exactly I can't tell if it was from God.

Never heard anything like that again. And no I have never heard voices or noises. Well with the exception of that one time noise of the mightiest wind.

If David Cameron says he only met with Brooks twice at the end of december and one was on the 23rd, does that mean his meeting her on the 24th is the other meeting or is it their meeting on the 26th that is the second one?:rotfl2:

I think Cameron is holding a load back :hmmm: lets hope he gets found out sooner rather than later :shifty:

The problem is that he is not managing to hold it back, all the little details and contradictions just keep on slipping out.