SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   Dangerous Waters (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=181)
-   -   towed array (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=180531)

scorpiondown 02-21-11 01:54 PM

towed array
 
I was wondering if a sub had it,s towed array deployed,,and an enemy sub is trailing ..would the enemy sub be able to detect that it is deployed? And if there were any collisions with these in real life when one boat would shadow the other?

Castout 02-21-11 02:16 PM

Enemy sub wouldn't know that a towed array is already deployed. It's a passive sensor so it's not making noises.

A Victor 3 sub has a picture of it getting a US sub towed array fouled on her hull. http://www.subguru.com/multimedia.htm

TLAM Strike 02-21-11 02:18 PM

If the sub was trailing and detected the array being deployed maybe. Not sure how much flow noise the array would make.

For your second question there was a well known incident where a Soviet Victor III the K-324 ran afoul of the Towed Array of a US Spruance class destroyer during a ASW exercise. The TA rapped around the Victor's screw and disabled her, she had to surface and send someone out with an axe to cut it off. She was towed to Cuba for repairs

In 2009 a PLAN sub bumped the Towed Array of the USS John S. McCain.

-GrayOwl- 02-21-11 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLAM Strike (Post 1602570)
If the sub was trailing and detected the array being deployed maybe. Not sure how much flow noise the array would make.

For your second question there was a well known incident where a Soviet Victor III the K-324 ran afoul of the Towed Array of a US Spruance class destroyer during a ASW exercise. The TA rapped around the Victor's screw and disabled her, she had to surface and send someone out with an axe to cut it off. She was towed to Cuba for repairs

In 2009 a PLAN sub bumped the Towed Array of the USS John S. McCain.



However do not forget - Victor, has brought with itself a cable and the sensor control towed array from -Sprunce- which has remained on the screw Victor.

Soviets - have received a good technical novelty for study. :DL

PS: And even there were attempts to remove from the screw Victor a cable - American helicopter tried to hook by a hook on a cable :-)

TLAM Strike 02-21-11 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -GrayOwl- (Post 1602639)
However do not forget - Victor, has brought with itself a cable and the sensor control towed array from -Sprunce- which has remained on the screw Victor.

Soviets - have received a good technical novelty for study. :DL

PS: And even there were attempts to remove from the screw Victor a cable - American helicopter tried to hook by a hook on a cable :-)

I read that we snagged the cable back. :hmmm:

No worries, a fisherman in Washington snagged a Pelamida in his nets a few years ago.

-GrayOwl- 02-21-11 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLAM Strike (Post 1602662)
I read that we snagged the cable back. :hmmm:

No worries, a fisherman in Washington snagged a Pelamida in his nets a few years ago.

To your regret - the gauge was not received from the helicopter.
Soviets have received not only a piece wire, but also sensor control (main sensor).


By the way - you probably are informed, that the first samples of Russian wires were very unreliable. There was a bad rubber - which from salty water and low temperatures gave cracks in wire.

The American samples, have given a good direction in this area. :-)

TLAM Strike 02-21-11 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -GrayOwl- (Post 1602674)
To your regret - the gauge was not received from the helicopter.
Soviets have received not only a piece wire, but also sensor control (main sensor).

Blind Man's Bluff said otherwise. Wouldn't be the only thing they got wrong in that book.

Quote:

By the way - you probably are informed, that the first samples of Russian wires were very unreliable. There was a bad rubber - which from salty water and low temperatures gave cracks in wire.
Yes they cracked if rolled too tight on the spool, that is why the 1st Russian subs with TAs had those big pods. The Oscars, Typhoons, Deltas, One Tango and one Akula were fitted with better arrays with out the pod.

-GrayOwl- 02-21-11 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLAM Strike (Post 1602696)
Blind Man's Bluff said otherwise. Wouldn't be the only thing they got wrong in that book.


Yes they cracked if rolled too tight on the spool, that is why the 1st Russian subs with TAs had those big pods. The Oscars, Typhoons, Deltas, One Tango and one Akula were fitted with better arrays with out the pod.


Gepard - there is no large pod.

It speaks that the problem was solved.

The large bobbin any more is not required.


Just as last models Russian Subs -Borey-, -Severodvinsk-.

Anybody any more has no the large pod.

TLAM Strike 02-21-11 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -GrayOwl- (Post 1602731)
Gepard - there is no large pod.

It speaks that the problem was solved.

The large bobbin any more is not required.


Just as last models Russian Subs -Borey-, -Severodvinsk-.

Anybody any more has no the large pod.

Yea Gepard that was the one with the improved TA.

The Lada class has the improved towed array as well.

Castout 02-21-11 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLAM Strike (Post 1602570)
If the sub was trailing and detected the array being deployed maybe. Not sure how much flow noise the array would make.

For your second question there was a well known incident where a Soviet Victor III the K-324 ran afoul of the Towed Array of a US Spruance class destroyer during a ASW exercise. The TA rapped around the Victor's screw and disabled her, she had to surface and send someone out with an axe to cut it off. She was towed to Cuba for repairs

In 2009 a PLAN sub bumped the Towed Array of the USS John S. McCain.

Thanks for the correction.:)

TLAM Strike 02-21-11 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Castout (Post 1602877)
Thanks for the correction.:)

I think the electrical signals that go down the array could be detected on LOFAR as well. :hmmm:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.