What's the British take on the Revolutionary war?
 

History is written by the victor. But, there's always two sides to any story. Anywho', ive been playing Empire Total war tell the wee hours in the morning, playing the US campaign. It starts as a tutorial with cut scenes and ends in a grand campaign to play. The cut scenes, are a little flowery to say the least:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpVWeWFIoWA
I know red white and blue BS when i see it, and that definitely qualifies. True its the classic story, but it's also very simplistic, and totally glosses over "minor" things we don't like to admit to, one example being the treatment of indian's. At any rate, i'm not looking for a detailed analysis, just wondering what the average brit's take on this portion of history is, because i'm pretty certain, its not anything like those flowery cut scenes.


(Hopefully this won't turn into a rhetorical mud slinging match by the local politico's :shifty: .)

Empire total war, I have always dreamed of using Luxembourg to take over the world in that game.

too bad they don't have Luxembourg:cry:

Now this I am going to watch

I wasn't there so I don't exactly how it went down, but I'd say it worked out pretty well in the end for both the US and UK.

LOL, it really is an honest question. Pure academic curiosity on my part. I know what *I* was taught, but i've always been curious as to what others were taught. The two stories are not always the same. I've wondered the same thing about Japan and Germany on ww2.

A good example of what i'm talking about is the American Civil War. Well, it's called the Civil war in most parts of the US, but It's also called, "The war between the states" and "The war of northern Aggression". Which version you hear depends on who you ask and where they're from.

I know that this is about the UK, but as an American I hear two sides. The first is the standard ultra-patriotic spiel about the rag-tag American patriots casting off the shackles of British oppression and tyrany to give birth to the greatest nation in the history of man. The other is neatly summed up by the quote from the film Dazed and Confused, charcterizing the revolution as a movement of aristocratic slave-owning white men who didn't want to pay their taxes.

For me, the truth is probably inbetween. Taxation without representation probably wasn't so cool, and the motives of the new American 'aristocracy' were probably less than altruistic. I also think that a number of my fellow Americans also forget that we needed the French to attain victory, and that victory wasn't so much total as it was the British throwing up their hands and going home.

I'm interested in this. I've been meaning to look further into the war than what was taught in school. I'd also be interested in a French perspective, as they were rather involved in the war, as well.

The Fiction book "From Powder Monkey to Admiral" by WHG Kingston written in the late 1800's is the story of three British boys in during the time of the American Revolution. The book gives interesting insight in to the attitude of the British citizens during this war.

I understand this book has been scanned and is available in a digital form. I have an original copy which, unfortunately, I abused as a kid. :damn::damn::damn::damn::damn:

Hmm. Looks like it's time to check the Kindle free book listings.

Dr. Howard Zinn's "A peoples history of the United States" is also a good reference. He delves into why many of the colonists were not in favour of fighting in the revolution and what purpose the Declaration of Independence was intended for.

As a Brit I figure that you've probably made a better job of it than we have, and chances are you would have had independence anyway post WWI when our economy got screwed, or at least a greater level of freedom, like Oz or Canada. So, no real biggie.

I guess I was missunderstood :DL

I really wanna hear what the brits have to say so I'll be watching this thread

Yup. If you have a Kindle, you can get it free right here:

http://www.amazon.com/Powder-Monkey-...6084758&sr=1-4

Downloaded it just now.

I remember one History professor I had, he was a real character. He liked to bring in relics of the period. Brought in a real 1700 era musket once, family heirloom i think he said. Almost got busted for it. Anyway, what i remember him most for, was his personal theory. He called it the "cocktail napkin theory". He figured some of our more outstanding incidents in history, started in the pub. Boston tea party being his primary example.

Don't forget the french having any excuse to stick one over on the english... :DL
How would the colonial civil war have shaped up without the aid of the french? (rhetorical question - we'll never know, or care at this juncture hehe).

Just so long as everyone understands that 'The Patriot' was about as historically accurate as 'Braveheart', or 'U571' for that matter. The first two were good stories, nothing more. As for U571, well, the less said the better haha.