![]() |
Are the days of English as world language counted?
http://www.economist.com/node/17730434
Quote:
|
Our current technology is still a long, long way from this. Ever tried google translate? Computers still can not read and understand texts the way a human reader does. Not by miles.
|
Yes..
I'm learning Klingon. :) Qapla' |
You mean welsh, STEED?
|
Quote:
|
I thought Spanish was more common in a worldwide context :hmmm:
Either that or Vendoran :DL |
The English language has been dead in the United States for decades.
|
Quote:
|
If they are counted what language are they counted in?
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Gibberish like these languages anyway.:O: |
Ostler overestimates the power of technology when harnessed to the stupidity of average users. What happens in actual practice when a computer hears an odd dialect, barely understandable in the next county, or reads a poorly spelled text? Errr, does not compute! Buzz, pop! Fizzle...
As for English, it fits the profile of lingua franca and continues to have a certain cachet & practicality for conducting the world's business. Among languages in the Roman alphabet, it is relatively free of diacritical marks. However it suffers from a surfeit of homonyms that can confuse even native speakers. It seems to have been common practice to use the language of the hegemon in decline, not its successor. Actually even native speakers may need to become fluent in the pidgin versions spoken by non-natives, i.e. Engrish! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.