SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   TSA agent caught wanking... (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=177326)

SteamWake 11-23-10 10:29 AM

TSA agent caught wanking...
 
Oh god I can only hope this story is hyperbole...

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Daily Squib
Airport officials at Denver International airport were on high alert yesterday when a full body scanner operator was caught masturbating in his booth as a team of High School netball players went through the scanner.


http://www.dailysquib.co.uk/?c=124&a=2389

TLAM Strike 11-23-10 10:32 AM

:haha:

Must cross post this link...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zn6Z9djh8eA

Herr-Berbunch 11-23-10 10:40 AM

Or this one...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvxm6lnqspY

:D

razark 11-23-10 12:41 PM

Or this:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/satire/scanner.asp

Tribesman 11-23-10 12:59 PM

Quote:

Oh god I can only hope this story is hyperbole...

If it wasn't just imagine the boost in sales from east coast elite liberal sexual deviants


http://dailysquib.co.uk/?c=117&a=2536

pledge takers against sex denied entry for denying entry
http://dailysquib.co.uk/?c=117&a=2521


The satirists are having a field day with the much hyped TSA non story that the loony fringe are making a national meal of:rotfl2:

SteamWake 11-23-10 01:28 PM

These storys do seem hyperinflated and all up in your face. Those incidents that do make the news are over the top tabloid type incidents. Frisking half naked young boys, babbys in their carriges, Nuns, urine bladder bursting, good looking women with a TSA agent hands on her breasts. This is the stuff the National Enquire froths at the mouth over. The rest of the media enjoys it as well.

I will agree with Limbaugh here (yes I know your all shocked) in that it is all in an effort to get you to use the scanners as the lesser of two invasive procedures.

About the pecunairy interists in those scanners is another topic but one you may wish to look into to get an idea of the players here. So get out your led foil hats :03:

Anyhow personally I would choose the scanner because I dont really care if my tiny shriveled junk and beer belly are scrutinized. Anyone 'turned on' by such an image really needs to seek help. If I was some supermodel or athlete I would be apprehensive to say the least.

Furthermore I will choose the scanner as I do not fly often. But I do understand those whom fly often holding concerns over repeated exposure. There is a reason the dental technician places a led 'vest' on you and then stands on the other side of a led wall when they take your xrays.

I'm just thinking a little common sense and some 'gasp' profiling would go an awful long ways.

As I said before why inconvience or 'offend' a few when we can inconvience and offend everyone.

Bubblehead1980 11-23-10 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteamWake (Post 1540426)
These storys do seem hyperinflated and all up in your face. Those incidents that do make the news are over the top tabloid type incidents. Frisking half naked young boys, babbys in their carriges, Nuns, urine bladder bursting, good looking women with a TSA agent hands on her breasts. This is the stuff the National Enquire froths at the mouth over. The rest of the media enjoys it as well.

I will agree with Limbaugh here (yes I know your all shocked) in that it is all in an effort to get you to use the scanners as the lesser of two invasive procedures.

About the pecunairy interists in those scanners is another topic but one you may wish to look into to get an idea of the players here. So get out your led foil hats :03:

Anyhow personally I would choose the scanner because I dont really care if my tiny shriveled junk and beer belly are scrutinized. Anyone 'turned on' by such an image really needs to seek help. If I was some supermodel or athlete I would be apprehensive to say the least.

Furthermore I will choose the scanner as I do not fly often. But I do understand those whom fly often holding concerns over repeated exposure. There is a reason the dental technician places a led 'vest' on you and then stands on the other side of a led wall when they take your xrays.

I'm just thinking a little common sense and some 'gasp' profiling would go an awful long ways.

As I said before why inconvience or 'offend' a few when we can inconvience and offend everyone.


Israel does it right, should follow their example as far as airline security goes.

mookiemookie 11-23-10 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteamWake (Post 1540426)
About the pecunairy interists in those scanners is another topic but one you may wish to look into to get an idea of the players here. So get out your led foil hats :03:

http://blogs.citypages.com/canderson...toff_wilma.jpg

gimpy117 11-23-10 02:55 PM

The scanners are just another attempt to put up the charade of safety. the problem is, is a terrorist really wants to smuggle a bomb on, or a gun, he'll find another way. These guys sit around all day figuring this out.

Like I said...this is just to catch the stupid terrorists. All these images thay shot of a lady with a gun in her pants or a knife are bunk. A metal detector would find both of them

CCIP 11-23-10 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gimpy117 (Post 1540467)
The scanners are just another attempt to put up the charade of safety. the problem is, is a terrorist really wants to smuggle a bomb on, or a gun, he'll find another way. These guys sit around all day figuring this out.

Like I said...this is just to catch the stupid terrorists. All these images thay shot of a lady with a gun in her pants or a knife are bunk. A metal detector would find both of them

Indeed. And I think a lot of that charade comes out of the ignorance of the fact that it's long been proven that a 'smart', well-trained and determined group of plotters, with a bit of serious effort and planning, can get in ANYWHERE that they want. That's life for you - for all you want to pretend, you can never be 100% safe. And even if you can be 99.9% safe, an adequately prepared foe will target that 0.1% gap without mistake. If nothing else, I think Red Cell proved that. Honestly, it's a fortune for us all that by and large, Al Quaeda plotters after 9/11 have all been incompetent bunglers. And it's their fortune that on 9/11, noone seemed to take the possibility of what actually happened seriously.

TLAM Strike 11-23-10 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gimpy117 (Post 1540467)
Like I said...this is just to catch the stupid terrorists. All these images thay shot of a lady with a gun in her pants or a knife are bunk. A metal detector would find both of them

Not if its a ceramic knife like the EOD and SEALs like to use... :hmmm:

Wolfehunter 11-23-10 04:59 PM

What did they expect was going to happen?... Guy sees a bunch of nude chicks... I'm waiting to hear these leaking online porn sites... or worse. Child porn... :nope:

This stupidity of these scanners and these excessive sexual abuse searches has to stop. :timeout:

gimpy117 11-23-10 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLAM Strike (Post 1540523)
Not if its a ceramic knife like the EOD and SEALs like to use... :hmmm:

that comes into the realm of "smart terrorists"
but it's been 9 years from 2001, you would think that, since we are just now getting these scanners, if it was such a huge problem we would have had it happened already.

besides, terrorists are now hiding bombs INSIDE of themselves. all these things will do is give use extra doses of radiation, and make us feel "safe"

mookiemookie 11-23-10 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gimpy117 (Post 1540534)
besides, terrorists are now hiding bombs INSIDE of themselves.

The logical next step:

http://www.boingboing.net/201011111141.jpg

nikimcbee 11-23-10 05:08 PM

[insert Dowly joke here]:D


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.