![]() |
TSA agent caught wanking...
Oh god I can only hope this story is hyperbole...
Quote:
http://www.dailysquib.co.uk/?c=124&a=2389 |
|
|
|
Quote:
http://dailysquib.co.uk/?c=117&a=2536 pledge takers against sex denied entry for denying entry http://dailysquib.co.uk/?c=117&a=2521 The satirists are having a field day with the much hyped TSA non story that the loony fringe are making a national meal of:rotfl2: |
These storys do seem hyperinflated and all up in your face. Those incidents that do make the news are over the top tabloid type incidents. Frisking half naked young boys, babbys in their carriges, Nuns, urine bladder bursting, good looking women with a TSA agent hands on her breasts. This is the stuff the National Enquire froths at the mouth over. The rest of the media enjoys it as well.
I will agree with Limbaugh here (yes I know your all shocked) in that it is all in an effort to get you to use the scanners as the lesser of two invasive procedures. About the pecunairy interists in those scanners is another topic but one you may wish to look into to get an idea of the players here. So get out your led foil hats :03: Anyhow personally I would choose the scanner because I dont really care if my tiny shriveled junk and beer belly are scrutinized. Anyone 'turned on' by such an image really needs to seek help. If I was some supermodel or athlete I would be apprehensive to say the least. Furthermore I will choose the scanner as I do not fly often. But I do understand those whom fly often holding concerns over repeated exposure. There is a reason the dental technician places a led 'vest' on you and then stands on the other side of a led wall when they take your xrays. I'm just thinking a little common sense and some 'gasp' profiling would go an awful long ways. As I said before why inconvience or 'offend' a few when we can inconvience and offend everyone. |
Quote:
Israel does it right, should follow their example as far as airline security goes. |
Quote:
|
The scanners are just another attempt to put up the charade of safety. the problem is, is a terrorist really wants to smuggle a bomb on, or a gun, he'll find another way. These guys sit around all day figuring this out.
Like I said...this is just to catch the stupid terrorists. All these images thay shot of a lady with a gun in her pants or a knife are bunk. A metal detector would find both of them |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
What did they expect was going to happen?... Guy sees a bunch of nude chicks... I'm waiting to hear these leaking online porn sites... or worse. Child porn... :nope:
This stupidity of these scanners and these excessive sexual abuse searches has to stop. :timeout: |
Quote:
but it's been 9 years from 2001, you would think that, since we are just now getting these scanners, if it was such a huge problem we would have had it happened already. besides, terrorists are now hiding bombs INSIDE of themselves. all these things will do is give use extra doses of radiation, and make us feel "safe" |
Quote:
http://www.boingboing.net/201011111141.jpg |
[insert Dowly joke here]:D
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.