Ok, smart guy. YOU solve the deficit!
 

Fun little interactive tool

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...s-graphic.html

My proposal is here: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...oices=y31k48jj

My solution ? I took ALL the money and went to a country without an extridition treaty. :haha:

:rotfl2: Well that solves your deficit.

My solution? Nuke China. No more debt problems. :smug:

No?

Oh, alright then:

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...oices=vs9k45j5

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...oices=xzt34kqx

Now I need ten truckloads of submachineguns to negotiate it against the lobby groups, and my private ammo factory to secure my argument supply.

BTW, I saved more than all of you so far. :O:

Am I the only one who is not reducing the nuclear arsenal and space spending? :doh:

http://mimg.ugo.com/200711/15341/cuts/buck_288x288.jpg

Is that only military space spending, or is it civilian space exploration?

People just don't understand the need for a strong deterrent against a Soviet first strike... :shifty:

Military I'd say:

"Would reduce number of nuclear warheads to 1,050, from 1,968. Would also reduce the number of Minuteman missiles and funding for nuclear research and development, missile development and space-based missile defense."

http://www.wearysloth.com/Gallery/Ac...2687-25516.gif

"Gentlemen, for the last fifteen years, I've fought at this table alongside your predecessors in the struggle against the Soviet. Now I do not wish to seem melodramatic, but I do wish to impress upon you a lesson I learned with bitter tears and great sacrifice. The Soviet understands only one language: action. Respects only one word: force."

Soviet? :hmmm::hmmm::hmmm::hmmm::hmmm:


.

Nope your not the only one!

http://img607.imageshack.us/img607/9...ickensride.jpg

My Plan:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...oices=w11jj5lq

Of course you did. Nobody argues against a guy with a submachinegun, eh...!

.