Sonalysts: new contract, new sim?
 

Since Sonalysts obviously won a new contract with the US Navy, could this be also raise also the hopes for a new sim?

http://www.theday.com/article/201010...0219387/-1/BIZ

Doubt it, it sounds more like a renewal of the old contract they have had for many years.

Agree with TLAM.

But even if Sonalysts do decide to make a new sim, I wouldn't hold my breath. Just look at how half assed DW is. I doubt they'd do any better with a second try.

oh, another 'let's hope for a new DW-like sim', which pops up in regular intervals :D

I fear there will be no one, except the Sonalysts-guys do it for non-profit reasons like (to my knowledge, not sure) eSim does do it partly with their Steel Beasts Pro product.

Unfortunately, there seems to be no statement so far if they could adopt that eSim model: Sell it without any publisher, make a tough price (>100$)...but I do not really know if the government requirements and commercial requirements could be aligned to have a similar business model like eSim.

Perhaps Frying Tiger could enlighten us here ;).

I think that DW is rather good. If you want half-assed try Silent Hunter 5.

DW 1.04 is pretty good. DW 1.0 was a bad joke.

yes, especially with the two major mods. I also think that the tactical AI with those mods is more then acceptable - only the strategic one has its flaws but you can live with that.

Anyway, it can be doubted that there will any new sim, which provides several subs, a frigate and ASW helo/plane in great detail + editing&modding capabilities + >600 pages of documentation for a initial price under 70$!

:haha:

I remember reading an article about their new/re-newed contract and I thought the same thing for a few moments before reality set in. I also doubt very highly that they will put out a new sim any time soon, if ever. There is simply no money to be made in such a market.

I have to wonder though, will there ever be new DW replacement?

WWII subsims, such as the Silent Hunter series, are a different genre. So they don't count in this discussion. We're talking about modern subsims here. Let's take a look at some of the most notable titles in the genre and the periods of time between their releases:

1) 688 Attack Sub (1988)

--6 year gap--

2) SSN-21 Seawolf (1994)

--2 year gap--

3) Fast Attack: High Tech Submarine Warfare (1996)

--1 year gap--

4) 688(I) Hunter/Killer (1997)

--4 year gap--

5) Sub Command (2001)

--4 year gap--

6) Dangerous Waters (2005)

--5, almost 6, year gap and counting--

Judging from the list above the average time between releases is just under 4 years. And the longest time between releases is 6 years.

We're almost past the 6 year mark and there's no replacement sim in sight. If history is any indication, things are not looking very good for us.

Is the subsim genre going to fade away completely?

They're not as different as you might think. Submarine simulators, historical or modern, computer or tabletop, all operate on the same basic principles. Sure, the SH series has always been a bit gamier, and the Sonalyst series more simish, but they certainly do count in the discussion, particularly when I have seen countless SH players lament the Ubi machine and wishing that they could convince Sonalysts to do a historical sim.

I guess the moral of the story is to be thankful for what you have. It could always be worse.

In fact quite the opposite. A "new" contract means that all assets are diverted to fullfill it. If they'd fail to get a contract then they might 've considered revisiting the sim market (which I doubt!).
.
.

I'm afraid so, you know hope dies last.

Actually a study sim would be better, just one model with higher fidelity.

It's to bad, I always return to DW from time to time.

I always keep seeing the price issue come up.

Imo if, you can't pay.... Don't play. :DL

I don't think there's much hope of seeing a good naval sim anytime soon. At least not one you have to pay for. Imo, there will probably never be a truly good, high fidelity naval sim. It's just too much work for any company given the size of the naval sim community. This is just one of those markets you have to invest a lot of time and money into, with small odds of getting a good enough return on investment to justify the time spent.

As for DW vs SH; No, they're very different. SH has massive time compression, and it's as real as you want it to be. No matter how you set the realism options it's still fun to play. So it appeals to a much larger crowd than DW. DW is far more technical, every little thing you do has an impact on the scenario. Put simply, SH has enough game elements to be fun, while DW is much more of a high level chess game. As for however buggy SH V is, take a look at the company that makes it.

On another note; http://www.commanders-academy.com/fo...splay.php?f=87 It's coming.. :ping:

Not necessarily true to me

Silent Hunter 3 and 4 ( I don't have 5) are more of an experience sim.
It simulates being in command and operating WWII sub in a second world war. Atmosphere is important in this kind of sim hence nice graphics and all.

while

DW is more like a procedural(function or tasking) sim that is the simulation of modern procedures of detecting, classifying, plotting and engaging enemy. It's more of tasking sim than an experience sim. To be frank it's more like a [simplified] training tool than a game.


The other type of sim is a study sim(Falcon 4.0, Blackshark) but to make one for sub sim is ridiculous.

At best the merging of SH3 and DW gameplay and type of sims will give us that dream sub sim game ever.

DW is a sim you can't just jump in and play. It has a stiff learning curve that, isn't most peoples cup of tea.

This was a training tool and after that, was watered down for security reasons and, put out as a sim as an after thought.

Mods have definitely made it better.