How's that taxation and socialism werkin' out fer ya?
 

http://www.sacbee.com/2010/04/15/267...vers-much.html

Sweden is easily the least stressed country I've ever been in. Too bad the Muslims will eventually eat it alive.

The best child care system I've ever seen, anywhere, is where dad went to work so mom could stay home and raise her own children.

Sorry, I don't support socialism on either continent.

I'm not quite sure what you are trying to say here.

The statement I made is based on the article, not the written post.

Nothing negative about any land or people.
Just my negative view of socialism.

Sarah Palin made a snarky and rather immature comment for someone who supposedly wants to be President: "How's that hope and change workin' out for ya?." a mild play on words of one of Obama's campaign slogans (she was clearly implying it was a disaster). The conservatives in the U.S. seem to hate socialism, which they ascribe to Obama. The article I linked implies socialism is better than the American right wing propaganda organs make it out to be, and my choice of words for the title was countersnarky.

And now here I am being snarky w/an image:

http://i26.tinypic.com/2cpanty.jpg

I'm sure you can figure out the unstated premises for yourself. I'm too tired to point out the painfully obvious right now :D

The South's gonna do it again...right after they buy, like, 20 million tons of frozen processed chicken, from the North after they get their food stamp check this May 1st.

Hey, I'm a supermarket service clerk. I can be a politically incorrect bastard with experience!

Just to set the record straight I dont remember Palin saying that. It was Rush Limbaugh.

I often ask the same 'immature' question.

So, which side do we Brits sign up for in the Civil War take two? :hmmm: I'm confused.

So to set the record straight, does that mean that Palin gets her talking points from a dumb junkie like Limbaugh?

Easy! You'll do the British thing!

Wait and see who wins ... As the rest of us ...:)!





.

Sarah Palin not only said it but encouraged people to pull over people with Obama bumper stickers on their cars: http://www.necn.com/03/27/10/Palin-t...92&feedID=4215

And it's working out well, thank you. How's that listening to that dopey/Cheney for 8 years thing workin' out for ya?

Good point that man! :yeah:

NM wins entirely because of the weapons labs, and military bases compared to a tiny population. This is a rare case where discretionary spending will rule that table, most of the rest are almost certainly programatic (entitlement) spending. Note that NM (like many of the states listed) is very closely divided politically.

The most important factors in the tax vs spending table are obviously tax base (large population—cities), and poor people that get entitlements. The south has loads of poor demographic groups, but not enough of a tax base. Happily for NY, the scum in the inner city are offset by investment bankers, etc.

Good points Tater.

The reality is that if you stopped the entitlements - or at least put some real work restrictions on most of them, you could solve alot of the issues facing poorer demographics. But when you "entitle" people to cash payments, food and in some places - transport - they have no reason to get off their arses and work.

I don't like Palin any more than I like Obama. Palin is goofy. The hard right wing is scary. The Democrats, on the other hand, complained that Reagan ran up the biggest National Debt in history. Obama's is a lot bigger.

I have one small quibble with that picture though: California is listed as giving more than they get? I though Cantafordya was bankrupt.