Old or New
 

Do you like the old authentic or the new modern interface?
http://www.gamershell.com/static/scr...63253_full.jpg
http://www.subsim.com/2010_02/sh5/20...0-30-24-87.jpg

http://pcmedia.gamespy.com/pc/image/...2103831728.jpg
http://www.subsim.com/2010_02/sh5/20...4-56-45-20.jpg

on the periscope i find the oldie better but on teammanagement i prefer the new look,it gives you what a commander needs to know;how are my officers doing?they will look after the crew,that's not your concern!

http://www.imgsrv.worldstart.com/sto...er-iii-ss3.jpg
http://www.gram.pl/upl/artykul/20100214140205.jpg

My bigest question is why choice Ubisoft this interface.:o
While the most like the old interface.

You are obviously referring to "everyone from SUBSIM"

http://img127.imageshack.us/img127/6697/sh3lp043ay4.jpg

http://www.subsim.com/2010_02/sh5/20...0-08-35-32.jpg

Out with the old, in with the new!!!!!!

Seriously though, from a "looks" perspective, i'm liking the new......
will be interesting once actually playing, if interface is economical or not....

I like the new one, especially the possibility to declutter the screen.

It's not even close. Old.

BTW, I think the OP is asking if you prefer the old vs the new from an artisitic and immersion standpoint. Not functional.

When you see the new logbook screen it looks like that cannot put your own stuff in there like you could in sh-2. I would like to put my own personal experiences of a certain patrol in there as well.

Old one, hands down.

be agressive

Mud

For the flooding, external/internal graphics: SH5 and new graphics for sure.
For functionality, authenticity and better design, SH3 hands down.
In a gist: They've killed all the nicely designed menus and functions, and replaced them with an awful interface, slapped some new graphics and paint on it...
Why not enhance on the previous series, why waste time to turn your working interface into an ugly, dis functional, disabled, thing! :stare: