![]() |
My local Sub.
I think one of the main reasons that I use the IX is because of this;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_submarine_U-534 My workplace was literally across the road from her for 2 years before she was chopped into 3 big lumps (like a sausage) and moved 2 odd miles to her final, final, final resting place! |
Quote:
Edit: Hmm they chopped her up to allow easier viewing, but no access... ? I would have just left her in 1 piece then fixed her up. |
Plenty of shots here:
http://www.mikekemble.com/ww2/uboat534-2.html A fitting letter/observation here: http://www.uboat.net/forums/read.php?3,76668 |
^^ Thanks jimbuna for the link to those photos. :salute:
It's a shame they had to dismember her and leave it all rusty inside. EDIT: Pulling a quote from the second link jimbuna posted. I hope that's okay to do. Quote:
|
That quote clearly sums up the futility of war :hmmm:
|
Quote:
|
Just found this, in the first shot, the big grey building behind her, with the white roof, was my place of work.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JeCJu5mjE0I |
Goodness, that is a fine beast of submersible technology. I'll have to watch the rest when I get back home tonight. The opening shot gives me an excellent idea on just how big the IX is/was.
Your post is a really interesting share, [SJ]nailz. I never really did get into the naval history of WWII as much as the ground and air wars when I was younger. The combination of Silent Hunter 3 and Subsim is turning me toward learning quite a bit more. |
Quote:
there used to be a photo thread here somewhere, i had been to see this at the exhibition with my two children. took some photos of the inside all rusty and old, they are in the thread... http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/show...144308&page=20. it is a lovely boat to see in in its completness. i love the photo you have in the link, you can see the depth charge blast against the side. the black and white photo does it justice too! shame they sliced it up though, you can not appreciate the gorgeous shape! hope the link works cheers:salute: |
|
It is a sad sight indeed, yeah Jim?
A couple of posts there gives an idea of why they had to do that: http://www.uboat.net/forums/read.php...6788#msg-76788 http://www.uboat.net/forums/read.php...6808#msg-76808 Hopefully they can come up with enough scratch that "she can be stitched back together in the future..." |
Quote:
|
Firstly, the costs involved in moving her whole would probably have been high enough to make the likelyhood of her being scrapped a definite possibility, so chopping her up is the only compromise. Also, there is the access issue, if I were a wheelchair user with my interest in U-boats, I'd really be quite offended if somebody were to argue that I should be denied the chance to see her in her entirety just because they didn't want her to lose her shape.
I think what they've done is respectful in that it preserves her interior as she was found which probably provokes more awe than if she were restored, and nobody is denied the chance to experience her to the same level as anybody else. I'd hate to be told 'You wait out here while I go inside and see things you can only dream about'. Cutting her was best for her and everybody who wants to see her. It wasn't done by 'butchers'. |
Quote:
i was really looking forward to get a U-534 t-shirt, no such luck though. the souvenier section really lets it down. the rest of it is very good but a little short. you also get to use a rig-up of the enigma: my children were faster at than me:oops: :rotfl2: "Cutting her was best for her and everybody who wants to see her" dont know about this?. i think lack of creativity and money were the paths persued. still its worth a visit just to see, after all how many u-boats do we get to see in england? how many did we sink? |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.