SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   How did they do it?? (politics) (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=159375)

SteamWake 12-21-09 10:17 AM

How did they do it?? (politics)
 
As you may or not be aware of the Senate passed its first vote on the health care bill while you slept.

Yup another Sundaty in the middle of the night vote while most media outlets are on autopilot and certain commentators are on vacation the vote is passed.

But how did they get the votes? There was a lot of contention and outright doubt that they could get enough votes... So how did they do it?

Well they did it the good old American Way... they bought it.

Quote:

WASHINGTON -- A $100 million item for construction of a university hospital was inserted in the Senate health care bill at the request of Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., who faces a difficult re-election campaign, his office said Sunday night.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...122002956.html

Let me give Mr. Dodd a little advice. If you think its tough now you just wait... dont buy a house ;)

August 12-21-09 10:25 AM

They have no shame. :nope:

SteamWake 12-21-09 10:34 AM

They are way beyond 'shame' they hold you in contempt.

Quote:

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) today took shots at those who are not supporting the health care legislation. During a floor speech, he excoriated Senate GOP members for up holding the pending health care bill and accused their supporters of being birthers and fanatics in right-wing militia and Aryan support groups. He started off by citing an editorial from the Manchester Journal Inquirer, which used insults like "lunatic fringe."
http://washingtontimes.com/weblogs/w...are-birthers-/

Never mind the fact that recent polling shows that nearly 60% of american voters do not want this legislation in its current form.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...th_care_reform

So much for representative goverment. :nope:

mookiemookie 12-21-09 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteamWake (Post 1222752)
So much for representative goverment. :nope:

Representative government =/= voting according to polls. Representative democracy means you don't have a direct say in the matter - your elected representative does.

In fact, what you're suggesting can be construed as socialist. A government ruled by the proletariat is a socialist concept: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictato...he_proletariat

AVGWarhawk 12-21-09 10:45 AM

All they want to do is make history and feel good about themselves. It does not matter who stands in their way. Welcome to...."I want my legacy and I do not care how I get it." Sadly, the bill still contains a charge for abortion. $1.00/month towards abortion. Sorry, I do not want to pay $12.00/year for abortions.

SteamWake 12-21-09 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mookiemookie (Post 1222757)
Representative government =/= voting according to polls. Representative democracy means you don't have a direct say in the matter - your elected representative does.

In fact, what you're suggesting can be construed as socialist. A government ruled by the proletariat is a socialist concept: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictato...he_proletariat

We put these pepole in office with the expectations that they will vote our will, not do whatever they think is best against our will.

This is a clear cut case of the goverment going against the wishes of the majority of the pepole. It will ultimatly end up in their demise but at what cost?

Torvald Von Mansee 12-21-09 10:54 AM

Isn't this a bill no one likes, except the insurance companies?

Buddahaid 12-21-09 11:33 AM

Since when our representatives have to follow the people's majority? That's not how it works,or ever really has. If you want an example of the people making government decisions, look at California's system and see how that works.

Torvald Von Mansee 12-21-09 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buddahaid (Post 1222789)
Since when our representatives have to follow the people's majority? That's not how it works,or ever really has. If you want an example of the people making government decisions, look at California's system and see how that works.

You mean the referendum system that allows people to make all kinds of wacky changes to California law w/out considering the consequences (e.g., like how to pay for something, or removing revenue streams which pay for existing programs)?

Snestorm 12-21-09 12:22 PM

The runnaway truck is gaining speed.
How long before the inevitable crash?

@Steamwake:
Thanks for the connection to The Rasmussen Report.
Good information source.

August 12-21-09 12:25 PM

My solution to Representatives that won't represent:

:/\\chop

SteamWake 12-21-09 12:27 PM

When you get right down to it one of the main problems with elected officals is the voters.

Either through ignorance or apathy the incumbents have a re-election rate of nearly 90% regardless of their party, voting records, or stances.

"We the pepole" evidently dont know or dont care.

Something tells me though that that statistic is about to change.

AVGWarhawk 12-21-09 12:28 PM

Term limits.

Platapus 12-21-09 07:50 PM

One useless man is called a disgrace
Two useless men are called a Law Firm
Three or more useless men are called a congress
- often miss-attributed to John Addams.

Buddahaid 12-21-09 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Torvald Von Mansee (Post 1222793)
You mean the referendum system that allows people to make all kinds of wacky changes to California law w/out considering the consequences (e.g., like how to pay for something, or removing revenue streams which pay for existing programs)?

That's the point.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.