SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   Silent Hunter III (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=182)
-   -   Can't Dive Deep enough! (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=157498)

slupanter 10-21-09 03:29 PM

Can't Dive Deep enough!
 
ASDIC is only usable above 300m so uboats would dive to 300m and long as the hull was good nic plus other boats upset ASDIC and warm water, cold water, fish, whales, sediment and the sea floor. But the glass and lose valves would pop and have to be tightened. plus DC only needs to be with in 40 - 50m and good night to your pressure hull unless your in shallows.
In GWX 3.1 or SH5 the depths need to be deeper for later subs

sorry upset got caught by Flower

GoldenRivet 10-21-09 03:44 PM

the depth capabilities of the U-boats in GWX are set to historical values.

SH3 Commander adjusts these values to a more randomized extent.

In reality, if a U-boat made 300 meters or deeper it was near the end for that crew anyhow.

U-48Kriegsmarine 10-21-09 04:03 PM

Believe U Me, if the real u-boaters could go to 300m, more than 25% of them would have come back, but they didn't! U-boats can't just dive to 300m to get below ASDIC, its just not possible, and I believe the game reflects this accurately.

Again, the casualty statistics show, If they could they would have, but they didn't because they can't.

Nice info though about the Whales, water and all that, I would love for a whale to just swim into the ping of a destroyer and save my skin!

:yeah:

Philipp_Thomsen 10-21-09 04:55 PM

The only true way to find out what can a non-damaged hull take, is actually doing it. But I don't think german skippers would just dive to 300m just to be sure it can take. It doesnt mean it can't. The only reports we have, are those from uboats that had flooding and went near 300m until they managed to start going up again.

I do believe that uboats with a inctact and perfect hull can reach 300m, yes. Just there's no how to prove it.

GoldenRivet 10-21-09 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Philipp_Thomsen (Post 1192801)
The only true way to find out what can a non-damaged hull take, is actually doing it. But I don't think german skippers would just dive to 300m just to be sure it can take. It doesnt mean it can't. The only reports we have, are those from uboats that had flooding and went near 300m until they managed to start going up again.

I do believe that uboats with a inctact and perfect hull can reach 300m, yes. Just there's no how to prove it.

Correct.

and the guage stops at 250M

beyond that you are testing the unknown.

besides... i dont even think subs could really measure any depth below 250m

i mean you got to hand it to those Germans... we are talking about a U-boat design from the mid 1930's capable of diving to near 900 ft

i mean compare that to the US Subs... their "test depth" was nearly twice as much as the US Sub's test depths across the board.

Philipp_Thomsen 10-21-09 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldenRivet (Post 1192811)
Correct.

and the guage stops at 250M

beyond that you are testing the unknown.

besides... i dont even think subs could really measure any depth below 250m

i mean you got to hand it to those Germans... we are talking about a U-boat design from the mid 1930's capable of diving to near 900 ft

i mean compare that to the US Subs... their "test depth" was nearly twice as much as the US Sub's test depths across the board.

With today's technology, subs should be going 1000m deep at 50kts no problem. Somehow they don't... but I believe that there must be an explanation for it... maybe the lack of necessity to go that deep?

tomfon 10-22-09 03:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Philipp_Thomsen (Post 1192801)
The only true way to find out what can a non-damaged hull take, is actually doing it. But I don't think german skippers would just dive to 300m just to be sure it can take. It doesnt mean it can't. The only reports we have, are those from uboats that had flooding and went near 300m until they managed to start going up again.

I do believe that uboats with a inctact and perfect hull can reach 300m, yes. Just there's no how to prove it.

Heh, good point.:)

slupanter 10-22-09 03:59 AM

Type XXI could drive deep but it still doesnt sort out the warm and cold water and whales lol. type VII would be crushed over about 179FT but type XXI could just take it i never said it wouldn't be damaged I.E glass and joints. but in the type IXC - C2 they changed the pressure hull from steel to armour plate increase the displacement to about 1000.

slupanter 10-22-09 04:18 AM

http://www.uboataces.com/uboat-type-xxi.shtml


Crushing depht 919ft (280m) ASDIC could see you at this depht at 2knots, warm and cool bands would mask the boat even at 200m. if you were singing, clanging and ahead full then your asking for trouble even maybe 280m

Pohl 10-22-09 10:24 AM

I once took a Type XXI to 270m but she started taking damage.....for a proof here's a picture

http://i626.photobucket.com/albums/t...n/b7941d9c.jpg

slupanter 10-22-09 02:37 PM

yeah sh3 is wrong about the type XXI at 15 knot is quieter than a us sub (cant remember which one Bal something). it not as good in the game as it was in the war

Sailor Steve 10-22-09 04:26 PM

Type XXI technology looked good on paper, but they suffered many problems since they were the first of their kind.

But since no Type XXIs were involved in combat, it's not really relevant.

psykopatsak 10-22-09 05:35 PM

if it was made more realistic, you would have to rush to get to an enemy ship before the war ended :P

Ducimus 10-22-09 06:28 PM

Reality and popular belief often differ.

Uboats, did not dive at or below 300 meters, at least, not on purpose, and definatly not with any regularity. I doubt you'll find more then one or two accounts of a uboat having gone to 300 meters deep or more and lived to tell about it. Furthermore, the stress undergone by the pressurehull at that depth by any submarine of the day, would have caused fatigue on the hull to such a degree, that retirement of the boat might be a consideration. At the least, the strength of the hull in future dives would have been drastically compromised, making the crush depth of the boat progressively shallower as the pressure hull became more and more fatigued.

The type 21 Uboat, wasn't all that and a bag of chips. Firstly, many of the internal lines and piping (such as hydrolic systems) were external to the pressure hull, making repairs by the crew virtually impossible. Secondly, you have to look at the hulls themselves. Made in sections at various yards, under the hammer of allied bombing. There are accounts of the various sections not fitting together correctly at the time of assembly. In otherwords, the hulls lacked quality due to the frantic/desperate situation in nazi germany's late war construction.

Platapus 10-22-09 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve (Post 1193203)
Type XXI technology looked good on paper, but they suffered many problems since they were the first of their kind.

But since no Type XXIs were involved in combat, it's not really relevant.

I guess it would depend on what you mean by "involved in combat"

The U2511 made one war patrol but did not sink any ships. But it did sneak up on a British Cruiser without being detected (Pretty interesting story)
The U3008 kinda sorta made a tiny patrol but went back into port before the cook had a chance to ask the Kaluen about the soup :)

Now if "involved in combat" means being attacked by the enemy, then you are most correct. By the time the Type XXI came about, the war was over (Literally in the case of the U-3008)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.