Skybird |
10-14-09 04:59 PM |
One could say: about time. Just too late, and I doubt it is sufficient.
One also needs to rename it, because it now is more a war on and in Pakistan than anything else.
Since YEARS I am preaching that the road to winning in Afghanistan, however unlikely that has already become, leads over neutralising Pakistan. And the enemy in Pakistan is two-folded: the Taliban, and their supporting smypathisers inside the structure of the armed forces and the intelligence services. The existence of the latter is what makes any prospect of lasting victory extremely unlikely. For that you would need to wage war against Pakistan itself.
I think the window of opportunity for Afghanistan has closed already many years ago, and the first step towards that outcome was shifting the battle focus from Afghanistan to Iraq. Now it is just about saving one's face by delaying admittance of failure as long as possible, at best cosmetical corrections of a failed outcome.
I tend to think that any troops being left there, are willed to be put at risk for nothing.
Deserting under such conditions imo becomes an at least morally legitimate option. If the government betrays it's obligations for the wellbeing of the troops and their legitimate and just committment, then the troops must no longer feel bounded to their obligations to that government in return. Because that obligation is a two-way road.
Quite drastic, but I stick to it.
Western nations should be forbidden to wage wars. They are too stupid for it.
|