![]() |
Post computer specs...
"My projected configuration to run the game very well (with all graphic options enabled, in 1280*1024) is:
dual core at 3 GHz (quad core is appreciated but not mandatory) 2 gb of ram nVidia 8800 GT 512mb (ATi 4850 512mb) 512mb on the video card is a minimum to play the game with every option checked. We're trying to make the game to fit into 256 mb of video memory (with the lowest settings)." maerean m Since most, if not all, the people on Subsim will probably buy the game I think it would be helpful to the developers to post what we have. I, for one, would want SH5 to be the Crysis of subsims so as to not have last years graphics on 2010 game. Hopefully a rez of 2560x1600 will be available to those who can run it (will lower details if necessary). maerean m configuring the game to a low rez like 1280x1024 has me worried... CPU: Intel Core i7 965 Extreme Edition Motherboard: ASUS P6T Deluxe RAM: Corsair 6gb 1600MHz 9-9-9-24-1T HDD's: WD VelociRaptor 300gb, WD VelociRaptor 300gb OS: MS Vista 64 Ultimate SP2 Video cards: SLI- eVGA GTX 280 FTW, eVGA GTX 280 SSC Monitor: Gateway XHD3000 30" Sound card: Creative X-Fi Titanium> Stello DA100 DAC> Travagan's Red Amp> Stax SR Lambda Speakers: Logitech Z-680 5.1 with Boston CR57 speakers PSU: Corsair HX1000W Case: SilverStone TJ07 |
You're just bragging. :O:
Doesn't matter what we have, all that matters is SH5 is coming! :woot: |
a low res like 1280x1024?:timeout:
dude, my monitor still needs degaussing! not to mention its wonderful ability to heat up my room in the middle of winter |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Can you believe I recently actually bought a new CRT, instead of LCD? :) 1280*1024/1280*960 is pretty much todays standard. :yep: |
Quote:
|
Actually a good CRT monitor beats the crap out of any LCD when it comes to visual quality. The only reason that i own an LCD myself is the size and weight of a 20"+ CRT.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Its about color correctness, contrast and the option of going to any resolution I want without drawbacks. Run desktop and most games at 1280*960, but older games like Dangerous Waters at 1600*1200. LCDs are stuck at their native res unless you're willing to accept the drawbacks of scaling. Being a perfectionist, that ain't gonna happen. :D * trying to make sense of the LCD market is a nightmare, with all the different panel types, varying standards for dot pitch, false brightness and contrast specs because they are artificially boosted with some questionable technique, etc. Figured I'd just stick with what I know works. :-? |
The OP needs to understand that Ubisoft makes their PC games to sell to the guy who buys a $600 system at Walmart or Best Buy.
The kind of hard core gamer/subsimmer that you find on a forum like this represents a very small percentage of total sales. Ubisoft needs this game to be playable and enjoyable on a system with 2GIGs of RAM, a decent mid range 512MB video card, and a decent mid range duo core processor. 1280 X 1084 is perfectly fine for a required res for the game. |
Quote:
with my good ole 256mb 8600GTS I can run CoD:WaW on maximum settings, and from what I've seen from the preview CoD:WaW graphics are a thousand times better. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.