SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   'War on terrorism' is over ! (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=154574)

SteamWake 08-06-09 12:55 PM

'War on terrorism' is over !
 
Celebrate everyone ! :woot:

Oh wait its just words :oops:

Quote:

It's official. The U.S. is no longer engaged in a "war on terrorism." Neither is it fighting "jihadists" or in a "global war."

President Obama's top homeland security and counterterrorism official took all three terms off the table of acceptable words inside the White House during a speech Thursday at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think tank.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...home_headlines

FIREWALL 08-06-09 01:06 PM

How many US citizens lives is considered a "reasonable" loss, due to terriorists, using OB's great plan ?


Is there a plan ? :doh:

AVGWarhawk 08-06-09 01:33 PM

Great, I guess it is just a 'police action' now! :shifty:


Quote:

"We are at war with al Qaeda," he said. "We are at war with its violent extremist allies who seek to carry on al Qaeda's murderous agenda."
Yeah, I would agree with this.

Fr8monkey 08-06-09 02:10 PM

On May 1, 2003 I thought Bush said, "Major combat operations in Iraq are over." and "In the Battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed."[

Damned Obama's fault.

SteamWake 08-06-09 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fr8monkey (Post 1146045)
On May 1, 2003 I thought Bush said, "Major combat operations in Iraq are over." and "In the Battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed."[

Damned Obama's fault.

Trying to find the relevance here...

Platapus 08-06-09 02:24 PM

Good

The phrase "war on terror" was meaningless and has no end

Terrorism is a tactic. Now if we were in a War against a specific terrorist group that would make more sense.

Personally, if Congress is not going to issue an official declaration of war, the term war should not be used. It just confuses things.

Task Force 08-06-09 02:25 PM

Il believe it when I see it...

August 08-06-09 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fr8monkey (Post 1146045)
On May 1, 2003 I thought Bush said...

And what does any of that have to do with Obama?

Aramike 08-06-09 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platapus (Post 1146058)
Good

The phrase "war on terror" was meaningless and has no end

Terrorism is a tactic. Now if we were in a War against a specific terrorist group that would make more sense.

Personally, if Congress is not going to issue an official declaration of war, the term war should not be used. It just confuses things.

Well, I understand the meaning of "War on Terror", so that makes it NOT meaningless, but I do agree that the War on Terror has no end. In any case, I couldn't really care less what they call it, as long as they do their job of protecting American citizens and the US's interests.

In any case, the administration saying that we are, instead, at war with Al Qaeda is freakin' stupidity at its finest. Good job legitimizing them, Obama.
Quote:

On May 1, 2003 I thought Bush said, "Major combat operations in Iraq are over." and "In the Battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed."

Damned Obama's fault.
Is it possible for you lefties to understand ANY topic outside of the framework of Bush?

And your point is so incredibly irrelevent, I'm wondering if your suffereing from Bush Derangement Syndrome.

Fr8monkey 08-06-09 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by August (Post 1146065)
And what does any of that have to do with Obama?

That is what a few select people do here is blame Obama for everything since the election... I just wanted to be first.

Tribesman 08-06-09 05:00 PM

So the war on terror is over.
Thank god as it was getting bad trying to sell a terrorist supporting regime as anti-terrorist.
I am so glad that they do be taking Jihad off the list as numbskulls understand the word Jihad as much as they understand the word Fatwah


But there is always one
Quote:

Well, I understand the meaning of "War on Terror",
Go on explain it for us lesser mortals.

FIREWALL 08-06-09 05:13 PM

There must be some kinda PC name to call terrorists.

And I'm sure OB and that pack of numbskulls of his will find it. :DL

Tribesman 08-06-09 05:24 PM

Quote:

There must be some kinda PC name to call terrorists.

You really walked into that one.
Define a terrorist

Kptlt Thomsen 08-06-09 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribesman (Post 1146161)
You really walked into that one.
Define a terrorist

Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Kpt. Lehmann 08-07-09 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platapus (Post 1146058)
Good

The phrase "war on terror" was meaningless and has no end

Terrorism is a tactic. Now if we were in a War against a specific terrorist group that would make more sense.

Personally, if Congress is not going to issue an official declaration of war, the term war should not be used. It just confuses things.

Does war need an 'official declaration' to infact be a war?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.