SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Put a lid on it !!! (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=153877)

SteamWake 07-17-09 10:02 AM

Put a lid on it !!!
 
Quote:

(AP) - In their zeal to protect their members from politically hazardous votes on issues such as gay marriage and gun control, Democrats running the House of Representatives are taking extraordinary steps to muzzle Republicans in this summer's debates on spending bills
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1

So much for Bipartisanship and open debate. :salute:

Onkel Neal 07-17-09 10:50 AM

I remember when the Republicans had a large majority in Congress, they were looking for ways to muzzle the Democrats :D

SteamWake 07-17-09 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neal Stevens (Post 1135788)
I remember when the Republicans had a large majority in Congress, they were looking for ways to muzzle the Democrats :D

Quite true, but isnt this legislation 'life changing' changing the very fabric of our society.

A few questions should be raised.

Buddahaid 07-17-09 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteamWake (Post 1135791)
Quite true, but isnt this legislation 'life changing' changing the very fabric of our society.

A few questions should be raised.

Silly business as usual in the congressional kindergarten sandbox.

Buddahaid

SteamWake 07-17-09 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buddahaid (Post 1135798)
Silly business as usual in the congressional kindergarten sandbox.

Buddahaid

Sigh so true... I was kind of hoping for change :haha:

Platapus 07-17-09 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neal Stevens (Post 1135788)
I remember when the Republicans had a large majority in Congress, they were looking for ways to muzzle the Democrats :D

Yup, all part of the game.

Each side, when in the minority, act suddenly surprised and shocked at the lack of bipartisanship.

Each side, when in the majority, suddenly forgets about it.

Bipartisanship seems to be defined as me letting you have my way. :nope:

SteamWake 07-17-09 02:36 PM

Yes thats all true and perhaps its just my perception but Ive never seen it so blatent and heavy handed as it appears to be now.

Platapus 07-17-09 02:44 PM

Well since you appear to be a supporter of the Republican party, it may just be your perception.

It is human nature to remember fondly that which we support and remember more critically that which we don't. (one of the advantages of being an independent is that I can hate both sides equally. LoL)

Bipartisanship or a lack of bipartisanship is difficult to measure and is often a subjective perception.

antikristuseke 07-17-09 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteamWake (Post 1135791)
Quite true, but isnt this legislation 'life changing' changing the very fabric of our society.

A few questions should be raised.

No, no it is'nt.

Zachstar 07-17-09 03:08 PM

This is nothing new. I may be a dem but I am well aware of the cowards in the party.

Its to the extent that I MAY end up voting 3rd party in 2010 especially with our resident turncoat democrat. I said MAY because I will only do it if the same type with the republicans can be found which mean pubs who are too scared of what the other side will do to vote for things like a new patriot act.

Or if the dems stand up and discuss hard issues like gays in the military.

SteamWake 07-17-09 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platapus (Post 1135951)
Well since you appear to be a supporter of the Republican party, it may just be your perception. .

Not any more my friend. I consider myself a fiscal conservative something the republican party left a long long time ago.

Zachstar 07-17-09 03:48 PM

There is no such thing as being conservative in that way without riots breaking out.

Seriously you touch welfare and it is riots. People are crazy these days about those checks and no matter who you vote for they will always remain.

And the medical programs touch = riots

And education programs touch = no campaign funding and/or riots

And military which you can touch a little as long as you fund drones and such but you cant cut it 50 percent like some fiscal conservatives want.

etc...

So you HAVE to spend but you have to spend better than stimulus. I kinda sorta agree with the stimulus because the recession was looking really bad at that point. but you need to fund technology. Because we have to have business with the "ability" to generate enough profit to pay enough taxes and give the jobs to reduce the welfare before you can be fiscally conservative. Its not some dem or pub thing its called "Poltical Reality"

Platapus 07-17-09 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteamWake (Post 1135978)
Not any more my friend. I consider myself a fiscal conservative something the republican party left a long long time ago.

I am a Recovering Republican also. :yeah: I was a Republican for the past 30 years of my adult life. But recently, the GoP has moved in areas that do not agree with my idea of being conservative.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.