SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Happy Sixtieth Birthday NATO (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=150282)

Platapus 04-05-09 02:14 PM

Happy Sixtieth Birthday NATO
 
The North Atlantic Treaty was signed on 4 April 49.

The original signers were

Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, United Kingdom, and the United States.

The treaty is one of the shortest treaties signed.

http://www.nato.int/docu/basictxt/treaty.htm

While not perfect (what is?), NATO seemed to do its job for sixty years. :salute:

Trivia question: When was the first time the "mutual self-defense" clause of NATO was used?

Mush Martin 04-05-09 02:51 PM

sept 13 2001 I think :woot:

Platapus 04-05-09 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mush Martin (Post 1078430)
sept 13 2001 I think :woot:

Close 9 Oct 2001 Operation Eagle Assist.

nikimcbee 04-05-09 03:57 PM

I always thought this was to specifically counter Warsaw Pact forces, but in the charter, it doesn't mention them by name. I always thought NATO had no purpose, since WP no longer exsist.

Raptor1 04-05-09 03:59 PM

Of course, you can't go around saying "We are forming this giant military alliance because the Commies are pissing us off", but people get the idea anyway

BTW, the Warsaw Pact was signed some years after NATO

nikimcbee 04-05-09 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raptor1 (Post 1078458)
Of course, you can't go around saying "We are forming this giant military alliance because the Commies are pissing us off", but people get the idea anyway

BTW, the Warsaw Pact was signed some years after NATO

I used to know, but I don't remember anymore.

It just strikes me as funny, that half of WP is in NATO now.

Skybird 04-05-09 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikimcbee (Post 1078465)
It just strikes me as funny, that half of WP is in NATO now.

"It's a trick...!" :ping:

Rhodes 04-07-09 11:47 AM

Ah! Who was the contry of the original signers that was not a democratic regime?

Sailor Steve 04-07-09 11:50 AM

Dang! NATO's just over a year older than me!

I wonder who'll last longer?:sunny:

Tribesman 04-07-09 11:54 AM

Quote:

Who was the contry of the original signers that was not a democratic regime?
That would be the fascist dictatorship under Salazar .

Rhodes 04-07-09 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribesman (Post 1079470)
That would be the fascist dictatorship under Salazar .

The correct answer was Portugal!:O: (actually it was more national-coorporativism)

Tribesman 04-07-09 02:28 PM

Quote:

(actually it was more national-coorporativism)
Isn't that what Mussolini said was the doctrine of fascism .

Rhodes 04-07-09 03:39 PM

Salazarism as it's call it or national-cooporativism may had his roots in the italian fascism, but it was not like it. And further discussion, one must make a new thread since this one is about the nato birthday.;)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.