Fema camps mentioned on Fox News Glenn Beck "I can't debunk them"
 

And he set out to 'debunk' them. Now Mr. Beck is worried himself...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dxUr...eature=related

Hmmm.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0P-hvPJPTi4

-S

Listen to this Congress session:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GTqTAOslMM&NR=1

He calls for - A NEW BILL OF RIGHTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Oh my gosh! :o:o:o:o:o SOmeone please dubunk this one for me. I would like some proof that he didn't just say that! I hope its wrong..........

Its got to be wrong. I can't believe it. So it must be.

-S

Edit:

PS. It is! Hilarious! :D

http://www.theonion.com/content/vide...fied_bill_will

Make sure you are wearing your tin foil hat Subman:rotfl:

I need one! I love it!

FEMA camps are real though. That one scares me.

-S

Sorry, this is classified. :88)

Making a mountain out of a mole hill. :shifty: Let me ask you Subman, why do I move no less than 300 mobile homes for FEMA every week? If these 'concentration camps' are being set up as just that, why bother with mobile homes? Just toss them all in there and start the human testing. :doh: Come on, this reporter was attempting to make it look like a German concentration camp at an Amtrak facility:88) Oh look, a rail head fenced in:o At a rail yard none the less:hmmm:

I hear ya, but the in-turned barbed wire is your first clue. That is designed to keep people in. Not people out.

An example - find a fence around your area designed to keep people out. You will find the barbed wire points towards the direction meant to stop the people.

-S

I think there is one of these near China Lake here in "Kalifornia". I may attempt to take some pics of this thing when i go hwy 40 on Vacation next month.

I'd like a look. I do get the sense that most people have an attitude of 'it can't happen here' mentality.

But it is. An example of how your Constitution crumbles in the last month:

Glenn Beck points out the Uber National Guard above - unconstitutional.

Obama as President with no birth cert, regardless the Supreme Court has asked for it - unconstitutional if he doesn't produce it.

Oregon voted in its house today (it passed) to remove the electoral college - unconstitutional.

Using taxpayer funds to fund private enterprise - Where does this exist in the Constitution? This is called nationalizing - Socialism/Communism - And BUSH STARTED IT! A conservative (supposedly)!

How far do we need to go? I think I need to create a thread titled - Unconstitutional

Our country is becoming no more.

I quote Winston Churchill:

“…If we can stand up to him, all Europe may be free and the life of the world may move forward into broad, sunlit uplands. But if we fail, then the whole world, including the United States, including all that we have known and cared for, will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of perverted science.


“Let us therefore brace ourselves to our duties, and so bear ourselves that if the British Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand years, men will still say, ‘This was their finest hour.’”


Your First clue - Global Warming - refers to perverted science for the sheep! We don't need Hitler. We are doing it to ourselves. Britain, you may be lucky to last 100 years instead of 1000.

-S

:haha:

And he did produce it:

http://obama2.com/wp-content/uploads...cate-small.jpg

About damn time. The electoral colleges and the electoral vote hardly constitute what the majority of citizens want for a leader. It's the popular vote that truly matters in a real democracy.

How long do you want to keep this up?

Well that answered my last question.

That's actually a pretty funny message. Really, it reminds me of the KKK and their paranoid belief that the nation is dying and falling apart, and there will be a race war to decide who dominates all.:har:

Silly racists.

Dude, it those fences many of which don't even have barbed wire on top, are designed to keep prisoners in then they did a piss poor job of it.

First off I didn't see one bit of razor wire, let alone the stacked coils, you see around real prisons. Toss a FEMA blanket over that weak triple strand shown in the video and just about anyone can negotiate the top of that fence in just a couple seconds without so much as a scratch.

Second. Nowhere in that video did it conclusively show what was in or out. There are buildings on both sides so making the barbed wire brackets look like they are one way or the other is a simple matter of moving the camera. Not even the gates show which side they're facing.

Third there are holes all along the fence. I saw one at 1:04 big enough to drive a cart through. Heck there WAS a cart already halfway through it!

Finally, and most damning imo those fences didn't even have truss rods at the bottom. Snip a couple of the lower tie wires and you can lift the whole bottom like a kilted Scotsman flashes the ladies. They would not stop masses of desperate people.

OH and BTW the Air Force engine and Army crane are at least a half a century old! They've "seen better days" is right. They belong in a museum not some super secret government concentration camp where a crane would be needed for.... what again?

Better research your quotes. This is the fake. Supreme Court already rejected it since its in digital form.

-S

That is way to new of a format. My birth certificate looks like it was made during the civil war days and I was born the same year as Barak Hussein Obama.

When you contact the authorities for a birth certificate, they just print a new one from their database, in whatever format they're using that day.

I had to get a few copies of mine a few years back (I seem to expend them at a pretty high rate), and the new one look nothing like the one I had when I registered for high school. My mom also got one, and they're identical to mine.

And Subman, do you have any news article about the supreme court rejecting it? It just seems extremely, extremely far fetched. (And "Because it's in digital form"? C'mon, like there wasn't someone in DC who couldn't walk a copy to the supreme court...)

Perhaps it is the new Gitmo:03: