Is it just me....
 

As of late, I have been seeing news articles were Obama is blasting McCain for the economy and other issues. These are worded is if McCain is at fault for all these things...personally. It it just me or has only else seen this?

Here is an example:

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5h...FPRcwD917VVC04


The first paragraph says it all. What the hell has Obama been doing about it? He is in the Senate, yes?

People, mostly Democrats, like to point at GB's approval rating but they rarely mention that Congresses ratings are even more abysmal.

Right or wrong, it is going to be VERY easy for Obama to demonize the Republicans for any evils that happened during the Bush admin.

PD

August,

I'm seeing more and more of this just this week. The articles are worded in such a way that portrays McCain as at fault for everything that is going on, as an extention of Bush(which is all they are attempting to do). The news media has gotten so bad it is pathedic. Once they are done with that twist, they start harping on his age. The media is driving Obama to the White House. It is sad that power to influence people is used in this pretext. The media has been driving the Obama deal since day one.

It is not about right or wrong....Capital hill is loaded with Republicans and Democrates, including both Obama and McCain who are at fault here. All of them should be pointed at themselves. The articles pointedly pin todays issues on McCain soley. That is not fair play and a crock of crap.

See above post of mine.

I found the person behind it all too!!!!:

-S




http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/4...ryobamaod5.jpg

Good Lord, I lost me lunch! :o

That's why I said "right or wrong". As in that doesn't matter, it's going to happen anyways. Just like in any other presidential election; but with Iraq and the economy (and again, I am NOT saying this is exclusively the Republicans' fault. Both parties played a part in getting us where we are, just the Republican's happened to have the Presidency at the time.) going the way they are, it is in Obama's interest and easy for him to pin them on the Repubs/McCain. Which is why, IMO, McCain has to fight a VERY uphill battle.

I know it's not fair play. But when was the last time a presidential election campaign was done"fairly".

PD

Mission Accomplished Sir! :p :cool:

-S

I think it is called campaigning. Both sides will be bringing up the weaknesses of the other candidate. Like any advertisement there will be embellishment and selective historical reporting.

Do you think Obama can win if he goes around saying that McCain is really a pretty good fiscal moderate.

Or McCain winning saying that Obama is bringing new ideas that just might work.


Of course not. That is not how our system of adversarial political parties works.

Obama has to treat McCain like the incumbent (old ideas, continuing bad policy) otherwise he can't get his message of change across. It really does not matter whether McCain supported or did not support the policies of the past administration, Obama will say that he does.

McCain has to treat Obama as radical with untried and risky policy. It does not matter whether Obama is or is not a radical or whether his policies are risky or not, McCain will say that he does.

We call this crap: politics

And we really should not pay all that much attention to it. We have two lying piece of crap politicians willing to say anything to get elected - That's the American way.

It is a fight between two personalities and it will get personal.

In the end, people will vote for whom ever they feel will be better for the job. By this time, I doubt that too many citizens are truly undecided (maybe 5%?)

So let the salesmen say their piece, it is what they get paid for. :yep:

Nice responses all but:



OK, just what the hell has Obama done about? All of a sudden he wakes up and decides to look at the real issues after what, two years in the Senate. Come on, is this guy really ready for anything?

That works both ways. A. It tells me that John McCain may have done nothing about it, but is he even on those committees?
B. It also tells me that Obama doesn't have any experience in leadership in the Senate, let alone as president, since he hasn't been in DC long enough to do anything either.

-S

I think it's quite possible an Obama presidency would turn out like JFK's. Full of hope and all that, a few notable foreign policy accomplishments. But not being able to move a damn thing through the House/Senate.

PD

The last line of yours is very telling, not of you, but general concensus, "long enough to do anything either" What does the general public believe he will do or can do? I do not understand this phenominon at all. I find it very odd.

JFK's term was cut short, no telling where he could have gone or not gone. Shame really not to know what could have become of his presidency if full term was given.