Another UK Sub runs aground
 

Isn't this #2 now in recent memory?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7422774.stm

-S

Sounds like she is showing her age.

Roll on the Astutes! :arrgh!:

It depends what your definition of recent memory is.The one that apeared in the press last week actually happened six years ago.It only re-appeared because a UK citizen asked to see the report and the MOD was obligated to publish it.
The latest would appear to be a repeat of the San Francisco incident.High speed into a seamount.Luckily it is believed that nobody was injured.

Ahh! It was you who posted it too i think. Anyway, sorry that I didn't know it was 6 years ago! :D Good to hear it isn't a weekly occurrence.

-S

We really are............................

http://www.myclassiclyrics.com/artis..._Biography.gif

Super-B's age hasn't really got anything to do with it.You could do the same with Astute if your navigation plan wasn't properly prepared.

I'm not in the ministry but...erm...don't submarines work on the surface too? :hmm:

Anyway, it's nothing major, well, the cost of repairing the sonar dome will probably be major but there was no breach of the inner hull and no crewmembers killed or hurt.I'm not quite sure how we seem to find these rocks...magnetism perhaps? But it's not as if it's a daily habit, and this kind of incident would probably have been covered up in the darker parts of the Cold War (Falklands conflict notwithstanding because I know an Oberon collided with a rock there and busted a forward tube) but because of all the hype about nuclear reactors, anything happening to anything with the word nuclear in it makes instant dread-news. :lol:

Gibraltar would be my best guess as an interim repair facility.http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/upload/i...0226095354.jpg

One for Neal - the subsim.com front page shows a photo labelled as Alliance linked to the Superb story, the pic is actually Actute. Not your fault, the original mistake was the Telegraph's.

I agree with Linton, this is nothing to do with age, just a mistake or error in a chart. I presume she's lost her bow array which is why she can't safely dive.

And the Conqueror got tangled up in seaweed. I'm guessing at Burdwood Bank. :lol:

IIRC on US submarines the bow dome is external to the presure hull. Maybe the UK does something diffrent maybe their just being extra safe I don't know.

Design of an S-boat would be similar to a 688.The Bow array would be in a watertight area.They were not originally fitted with a reelable towed array and had clip-on ones instead.The Bow sonar would give her eyes and ears forward and without them she would be at a disadvantage submerged.It would not affect her ability to navigate on the surface.Problems are going to be logistical with regards to repairs.I said earlier that Gibraltar is the probable destination,but this will seriously affect the relationship with the Spanish neighbours.
Another source suggests that the Red Sea is very well mapped underwater, and this may have been a navigational error.:oops:

Yeah id agree with linton on this gibralter for repairs doubt the spanish would like that though well heres my two fingers to them !

We own gibralter so we do what we like tuff if you dont like it.

On RN boats the sonar sensors are external to the pressure hull, in a free flood space, covered by the bow dome. As I understand it the safety aspect is to do with them diving in a busy traffic area without 'ears'.

That depends on what's needed, the last RN SSN to do this needed a whole new front end and Gib has no suitable dry dock.

Glad you've not given up your ambition for the diplomatic service though ;)

Oh we are very diplomatic in my house hold i decide everyone else agrees.

This report suggests that she may be scrapped.They just have to get her home first:
http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/news...e_scrapped.php