![]() |
A slap in the face to the Western World's idea of free speach
This is pathetic and unheard of. Basically if athletes see something they are against, they are barred from talking about it - even after returning home!
-S Olympic kow tow as British athletes are forced to sign contracts banning criticism of Chinese regime - http://www.phayul.com/news/article.a...egime&id=19209 Belgian athletes will be barred from talking politics at the Olympic sites - http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/01/...olympics23.php Where's the IOC's voice on press freedom in China? - http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...rnational/home But at least people the likes of Spielberg are speaking out about it: China feels heat as activists take their cue from Spielberg - http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/fe...12.humanrights |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Wow and did anyone notice the advertizement at the bottom of that article?
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com...jIIaRB_z9uar1A |
Quote:
-S |
Quote:
"We will help you explore the mysteries of Tibet We will give you memories to last a lifetime No fixed departure date" |
Quote:
http://www.typicallyspanish.com/news...le_13578.shtml If you consider Spain as a Western country ;) |
Quote:
But if you analyze this - this is more a defamation case and not one of free speech. Its like you writing something inaccurate about me and damaging my reputation. You can sue for that in a Western country. If you write about something about me that is damaging but true however, then no, you can't be sued for it. In China - the will be the case - they are barred from saying things that they have seen and are true. This is the problem. THis Spanish case however is major grey area. I wonder what will happen??? -S |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.