![]() |
Balao Top of the Line?
Last campaign I managed to get all the way to the Balao class before getting greedy in a convoy action and getting wasted by a couple of destroyer. But I did like that sub.
Fast diving, good range/speed, excellent hitting power - whats not to like. I'm just wondering, is there any value to eventually (if I get the chance) of upgrading to the Tench version? Anybody know if it offers any compelling advantages over the Balao? |
By all means, do upgrade to the Tench version... if you can...
|
Quote:
I'll bet if one was to instantiate a tench object using the balao model - nobody would know the difference. :lol: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Balao class http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...hip/ss-285.htm Tanch Class http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...hip/ss-417.htm |
Main differences between a Balao and a Tench are the Tench had a 600 foot diving depth as opposed to 400 and it carried 28 torpedoes instead of 24. I think only a couple of the got into the action during the war (Tigrone was a Tench I know).
|
Quote:
The Salmon and Sargo types were still limited to operating at 250 feet. even though they had the same thickness and tensel strength of the Tamber. Tamber and Gato types got the extra depth because of construction methods had improved the stiffness of the boat. The main difference in the Tench class and the Balao (basicly a repeat of design of Gato using the heavier steel) class is the layout of the trim tanks. This lead to a better internal layout elimanating the risors in both Torpedo rooms and clearing space to carry more torpedos. The risors in the Balao class was thought to be a point of weakness in the boat design. The rearangement of the the trim tanks gave the Tench class its destinctive nuckle at the bow. Both boats were thought equal in the eyes of the crews that maned them. As for the engine layout that depended on what yard laid them down. Both types could have geared or direct drive. It depended on the yard and time they were laid down. Deck guns were mounted acording to the pattern that was set at time of service. Some Tenches had two, just like some Balaos had two. Jest depends on the time. |
|
What's a risor?
|
Should be riser, bad spelling and fast typing on my part. the Riser is a cross member where the outer hull joined the inner hull (where the double hull ended) the beams of the risers ran from the lower deck all the way upto the upper overhead. The riser in the older boats was elimanated by rearrangement of tanks.
|
Balaos are king in SH4, but Tambors have my heart.
|
I thought I would drop some diagrams here to show the progression in design of the fleet boats from Tamber to Tench.
http://i342.photobucket.com/albums/o...31a/Tamber.jpg Tamber introduced the 10 tube armament to the fleet. the earlier boats had from 6 to 8 tubes. http://i342.photobucket.com/albums/o...oy31a/Gato.jpg As I stated earlier in the thread, the most important development in the Gato was the introduction of the bulkhead that divided the engine room. Due to the war, the Gato design was frozen for mass production. http://i342.photobucket.com/albums/o...y31a/Balao.jpg With the introduction of the high tensil steel and improved the basic design of the Gato. http://i342.photobucket.com/albums/o...y31a/Tench.jpg The Tench was the ultimate in fleet boats during the war. This diagram shows the changes to the trim tanks and helps show the impoved internal layout of the boat. the larger coning tower seen on the diagram was a one off experiement tried on the USS Sarda (SS-488) |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.