![]() |
Cut me a break
Another sacrifice on the alter of science as faith. Laughable theory in action.
Forget about the threat that mankind poses to the Earth: our activities may be shortening the life of the universe too. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/mai...-mostviewedbox Like this consensus: UN: Millions Not Suffering AIDS Now Doomed to Drown Quote:
|
I've been using a variation of this theory to annoy my neighbour (who is a tw@t), every once in a while I lean out of the window and look at his house (in the scientific equivalent of a 'Paddington Hard Stare'); I figure if I do this often enough I will accelerate its decay and it will fall down, preferably while he is still inside it.
If you subscribe to the opposite theory, you could try stopping your car from rusting by training a webcam on it, thus making the rust feel self conscious about what it is doing and thus keeping your shiny car in pristine condition. I'm inviting nominations for a nobel prize for my tireless practical experiments in this field, although I'll settle for a big research grant instead.:rotfl: :D Chock |
Quote:
As P T Barnum said, 'there's a sucker born every minute'. |
Quote:
|
For how many thousands of years has man looked up at the stars?
When will we start to say to these scientist that they are full of sh*t? |
This sounds like something out of a bad sci-fi flick, where an alien species roams the universe killing off anyone who might inadvertently observe dark energy, in the name of preserving the universe. :huh:
|
didn't they do an experiment to prove this strangeness..?
i'm not a scientist so don't expect me to get the details right..but..the jist of it was something along these lines....some form of binary molecule or electron or similar..was split in two ...one electron was taken to a university many miles away ..the other remained at the home university...the rule was that if one electron was positively charged ..then the other must become negatively charged (for the universe to make sense..anyhuw lol)....BUT ..and here was the rub of the experiment...this did not happen untill one or the other electron was observed under an electron microscope (or something similar..or at the very least the polarity was measured iin some way) every time one electron was observed the other automatically changed to match the measurement taken from the first electron...so if the first was observed to be negative ..the other immediately became positive...the whole shebang of the thing was a/why did this only happen when the electron was observed... and b/ how the heck did the "other" elctron "know" that the first had been observed and change polarity to match.. as i say haven't got the details correct but the basic idea is there some where...anyhuw they did demonstrate "it" or something anyway.:hmm: or maybe it was that when they changed the polarity of one of the electrons the other immediately changed to match (even tho it was 50 miles away and isolated in a laboratory) weird and wacky universe we live in |
This is not unusual, I mean, how does toast know to land butter-side down when you drop it?
:D Chock |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.