SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   Silent Hunter III (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=182)
-   -   I wonder why... (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=124117)

frenema 10-26-07 05:47 PM

I wonder why...
 
the Allies didn't just have the merchant ships with different mast heights so that the U-boats wouldn't be able to tell the exact distance of the ship. Or why not have all the merchant ships sail in zigzag all the time? Now, I've never read any books on submarines or have any knowledge of naval warfare, so can anyone enlighten me on this? :doh:

bigboywooly 10-26-07 05:51 PM

Sailing zig zag uses more fuel
Fuel was at a premium
Convoys sailed from A to B at the fastest speed of the slowest ship in the convoy

Even plotted turns were a nightmare trying to get all ships in sync at the same time

As to mast heights - well they were different
There were hundreds of types of merchant ships on the seas in WW2
The game only has a fraction

seafarer 10-26-07 06:06 PM

Given the size of many convoys, the huge area of ocean covered, the differences in nationalities and language, it was a huge challenge just to keep all the ships steaming in their lanes on a straight course. Zig-zag courses were a nightmare to co-ordinate, especially in bad weather and limited visibility, and with radio communication blackouts and often only a handful of escorts to handle things.

Brag 10-26-07 09:35 PM

J.S. Balz writes:

You're all a bunch of nitwitz. Allies Zag-zigged while we tried to figure their zig-zagging. We lost war. Keiz Klozet.

KptLt. Johan Sebastian Balz the Magnificent :smug:

Torplexed 10-26-07 09:38 PM

That's probably how the majority of convoy stragglers were generated. Zigged when I should have zagged.

frenema 10-27-07 09:07 PM

Thanks for the replies, but I'm still a bit puzzled.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigboywooly
As to mast heights - well they were different
There were hundreds of types of merchant ships on the seas in WW2
The game only has a fraction

So does that mean they had info on all the Allied ships into a book or did they have some other way of finding the distance?

Torplexed 10-27-07 09:24 PM

They probably had something quite similar to the ONI manual the US navy used.

http://www.history-on-cdrom.com/0c1c20c0.jpg
http://www.history-on-cdrom.com/0c2c20a0.jpg

Jimbuna 10-28-07 09:40 AM

As intimated earlier....general Class names/types only.
However, in the case of prominent and 'one off' vessels eg: Queen Mary, they would have precise details :arrgh!:

bigboywooly 10-28-07 10:17 AM

There is a book specific to uboats for ship identification
Similar to the US ONI ones
If only I could remember the name :damn:

Jimbuna 10-28-07 10:22 AM

GWX Recognition Manual :lol:

bigboywooly 10-28-07 10:43 AM

:roll: Sigh

Humour him

Torplexed 10-28-07 11:06 AM

I think one of the German equivalents was called Weyers' Flottentaschenbuch. Warships of the World...sorta similar to Jane's Ships.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.