SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Poor Poor F-14s (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=117749)

dean_acheson 07-02-07 03:00 PM

Poor Poor F-14s
 
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070702/...edding_tomcats

How sad. :(

Skybird 07-02-07 05:21 PM

Tomcats, wowh... the fighterplane of my youth. It looked like a jetfighter should look like. One of the bestlooking designs ever.

Heibges 07-02-07 05:32 PM

I'm going to make a documentary: "Who killed the F-14 Tomcat?":D

Isn't "Poor Poor F-14" a Warren Zevon song?:rotfl:

robbo180265 07-02-07 05:34 PM

I think the picture and the write up from the Yahoo report says it all

http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w...1b541a8620.jpg

"This 1988 photo provided by Dale Snodgrass shows Snodgrass as a Navy Capt. performing a 'flyby'' next to the USS America. The F-14 flyover was shot by a crewman aboard the USS America, during a Dependent's Day cruise in 1998, during which families of the crew members are brought on the ship for a day at sea. At the time Snodgrass was Executive Officer of the VF-33 fighter squadron (The Starfighters) out of Oceana Naval Base in Virginia deployed aboard the USS America. (AP Photo/Courtesy Dale Snodgrass)"

Beautiful aircraft.

bradclark1 07-02-07 07:01 PM

I wonder if Tom Cruise was offered one.:)
Pity. It's a majors passing of our time (well, mine anyway).

XLjedi 07-02-07 07:12 PM

Eh... It's a big flyin turkey.

I'm surprised they didn't mothball the lot of em a decade ago...

Probably only thing remarkable bout em was their :ping: and phoenix missiles.

PeriscopeDepth 07-02-07 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heibges
Isn't "Poor Poor F-14" a Warren Zevon song?:rotfl:

If I could rep you for mentioning Warren Zevon, I would.

And on topic, the F-14 was far and away the best modern fighter to ever leave a carrier's decks. And still is, even if it isn't in service anymore.

PD

TteFAboB 07-02-07 08:49 PM

Save one to sell to that South African collector!

Yahoshua 07-02-07 09:04 PM

Instead of cutting them up wouldn't it be more efficient to test ASM on these aircraft?

fatty 07-02-07 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yahoshua
Instead of cutting them up wouldn't it be more efficient to test ASM on these aircraft?

Not that I advocate more sabre rattling (far from it, actually) but it would be clever to equip some of our OPFOR squadrons with these planes to let our Hornet boys get used to targetting and maneuvering against them. Somebody has probably already thought of that.

07-02-07 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bradclark1
I wonder if Tom Cruise was offered one.:)
Pity. It's a majors passing of our time (well, mine anyway).

Wouldn't he just take it if he wanted it? If he can take a country why not an airplane?

PeriscopeDepth 07-02-07 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yahoshua
Instead of cutting them up wouldn't it be more efficient to test ASM on these aircraft?

They seem to be very paranoid that if they aren't destroyed the parts will find their way to Iran. Rightfully so though.

PD

PeriscopeDepth 07-02-07 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fatty
Quote:

Originally Posted by Yahoshua
Instead of cutting them up wouldn't it be more efficient to test ASM on these aircraft?

Not that I advocate more sabre rattling (far from it, actually) but it would be clever to equip some of our OPFOR squadrons with these planes to let our Hornet boys get used to targetting and maneuvering against them. Somebody has probably already thought of that.

They would make an excellent simulated Flanker as well, methinks.

PD

SUBMAN1 07-02-07 09:39 PM

Good. Except now that I can't buy one is the only problem. Not that it matters. The F-14 is a time come and gone. I won't miss it much because it was only good as an interceptor, not a fighter.

I still have this itch to find a way to buy an F-5E at some point though. I think that may be the ultimate toy if you don't count gas prices these days.

-S

07-02-07 09:41 PM

Like every airplane it had its plusses and minusses. Designed for stand off missions to protect the carriers it wasn't very good in the dogfight. Large engines which guzzled fuel, and had a bad tendancy to have compressor stalls, variable geometry wings which gave its opponent information about energy. Large A/C for a carrier, reducing the numbers which could be carried.

AIM-54 which could strike A/C from long distance, RADAR which was very advanced for its time. No catapult bridle. The return of a gun on Navy A/C.

The list goes on.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.