![]() |
this is he reason why i am a MB fanatic
i love mercedes benz... all MB cars... and this is why.. all other companies based their safety of MB.. MB had the first airbags,crumble zones, seatbelt pretensioners , "passenger cell"
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fu...oid=1428174512 and that version had no airbags and the family survived... :rock::rock::rock: |
Looks like a Leo-2 took a bite, found that it does not taste well and left the rest untouched, moving away...
|
Not to trump on your passion about the car, but Mercedes is not what it used to be. A friend of mine who used to work on Mercedes, because he thought they were the greatest thing on Earth, quit because he can't stand the quality of the cars anymore. You could see his desire drop for them as the years went on. Same thing with another guy too - My sales guy at Cadillac used to sell Mercedes. A couple years back he went to selling Cadillac for much the same reason - he no longer felt good about the product he was selling.
Why? Haven't you noticed that Mercedes haven't changed in price in 10, 15, to 20 years? Other car manufacturers costs keep going up, but theirs stays pretty much the same unless you buy a 'specialized' version. That means their quality is what has taken it in the shorts to make up for the stagnent rise in the cost of the cars. Everything is cheaply made now on Mercedes. BMW, though they have done some things similar, has for the most part avoided the pitfalls Mercedes has fallen into. Hopefully at least one of the good German car manufacturers stays inline, and that torch goes to BMW to carry on for now. Maybe Mercedes will pull out of it at some point and go back to building top notch cars, but I seriously doubt it. -S |
Air bags?
crumble zones? seat-belts? "passenger cells"? I know not of these! Helmets! now there's a safety feature! :D ...goes to polish the Honda... |
If you want evidence of the quality drop in Mercedes, take a look at the shut lines on a new Mercedes and compare it to one from about pre-1985. Then try shutting the door on an old one and listen, after that, do it on a new one, that sound is not the sound of quality on the new ones! Also note that the price has dropped considerably, but the extras are more abundant; up until about 1999, you didn't even get a radio as standard in a Merc, so why are they now cheaper - when one is now included - if the quality hasn't dipped?
My wife's old Merc 300 Estate was way better than the ones you get these days. :D Chock |
I'm about to take on an old Mercedes restoration project, an '88 190E 2.3, with 219,000 km on it, and boy is that thing made to last. All I had to do to get it running again after two years of dormancy while exposed to the elements (without any long-term storage preparation, I might add) was unstick the brakes, clean the battery posts and add fresh fuel and she ran almost immediately when I jump-started her. Unfortunately, she's not going anywhere just yet, due to a gas leak (hope it isn't the tank, because I'd have to drop out the differential and driveshaft to replace or repair it). Those cars are little tanks, and I still see plenty of 190s on the road here today.
But yeah, unfortunately M-B simply doesn't make their cars the way they used to, and the recent black eye the lack of their current cars' reliability has given them attests to that. In less than 20 years, Mercedes' have gone from one of the most reliable cars on the road, to one of the least. |
....LOL their newer cars are even safer then the older models... advanced precollision systems.... they only reason they arent reliable is becuase of soo many complex electronics that are in the cars.... and id rather sacrifice reliabilty then my legs or my life....:shifty:
http://www1.vg.no/bil-og-motor/artik...p?artid=103064 there...lets see a toyota or honda beat that....:arrgh!: |
http://www.worldcarfans.com/classics...oner-revisited
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/m...15twodead.html 2002 mercedes......saturn = 0 mercedes = 1...saturn occupants =rip... mercedes occupants = live to drive a benz again.... and it was accidental.. the 17 yr old lost control after someone swerved in front of him.. "Authorities said alcohol might have been a factor. The 21-year-old driver of a 1995 Saturn station wagon was driving at an estimated 80 mph" :shifty::shifty::shifty::shifty::shifty: AND the reason why mercedes are so unreliable is beacause they crammed so much stuff to keep alive and comfortable inside.... The W221 S-Class continues its tradition of leadership in automotive safety. It contains a large number of features designed to improve safety for the driver and passengers. Many of the features are evolutions of previous Mercedes developments, such as Brake Assist and Pre-Safe. A short list is presented below.
Comfort and convenience The W221 S-Class features a variety of technologies intended to reduce the driver's workload and make the ride smoother and more comfortable for passengers. Like the safety features, many of these items are evolutions of those fitted to earlier models. Some notable features include:
|
I always thought Mercedes looked nice...as I drove past them in my old 1979 Pontiac Firebird. Man I miss that car...
|
a c class benz newer then 2000 was tboned by a speeding TRUCK... 5 pple inside 3 dead.. 2 died instantly.... and heres whats left of the benz
http://www.bn9.com/images/news/2006/4/21/lgmerc2.jpg a 2004 c class benz was slammed into the side by a drunk driver going 120mph and he ran a red light... 5 pple inside 3 dead 2 died instantly....5 pple and 3 died...froma Tbone crash from a suv 1000lbs+ heavier goin 120mph....:huh::huh: r.i.p to the pple inside the benz |
Quote:
If you want a safe and reliable luxury car, your best bet is a Lexus. |
LOL i know.. we have te LS460L .... but the funny thing is.. alot of lexus features such as the precollision radar and radar cruise control are from MB
|
|
When will people such as Skybird learn?
When your number is up.. there's no amount of contraptions to make you somehow live forever. I've been in a few crashes including a vehicle that rolled numerous times. I'm still alive. Perhaps my luck will run out, but it will run out all the same sometime. This "safe vehicle" point is the same as the global warming crowd trying to proclaim the end of the world when all they're doing is trying to make the afforementioned world the way they think it should serve them. :roll: |
Some europaphobia here that reminds of the Airbus-antipathy-thread.
The ADAC (Allgemeiner deutscher Automobil-Club) is the world's largest (by numbers of members, and lobbying power) cardriver association, thus their statistics on malfunctions in cars have some weight (car producers fear them like the devil). Included are cars that were running from 2001-2006. Numbers are failures per 1000. http://www.autosieger.de/images/arti...k_2006_15g.jpg after several years when Japanese cars prooved to be the most reliable, in the recent past German cars in general, not only Mercedes, are claiming top positions again. Part of that yearly statistic is also the reasons for malfunctions. Here, with close to 40%, electrical system is the top candidate. http://www.heise.de/autos/bildergalerien/3788/1 |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.