![]() |
Petition to S.C.S for a SDK
What you guys think? Should we ask S.C.S to release a SDK?
|
Go for it, but it will never happen, for the same reason that we aren't "allowed" to make our own units.
|
We can ask SCS for a lot of things but this is something we most likely wont get ... why? Because DW is just an offspin of SCS product for its goverment customers. They make money by creating platforms and stuff for them. Guess what they don't want ... that those customers can get their new platforms and whatnot for free.
But hey ... it never hurts to ask - just dont hold your breath. Cheers OS |
They won't make it anyway. Such thing needs documentation and support. And it will expose bugs not exposed yet.
It is more expensive then not releasing anything, that's sure :|\\ |
Would be nice, but... You might as well ask for the plans to the real platforms for all you are likely get anywhere LOL.
As OneShot points out, they'll not want to feed the hand that will clearly bite it! |
Just keep up the votes up then we band together to force S.C.S to release it.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If it's counter productive to how S.C.S does it's business, whether that is on the government side or commercial, they won’t do it. It won’t matter if you have the entire forum signing “yes” or not. It won't matter if they all are kicking or screaming about it either. 90% of S.C.S business is government contract work, and they use the game engine for DW in government simulations. They also charge good money to add platforms and other things to the engine per contract basis. If they release the SDK, they’d be giving away one of their capabilities to make money for their business. |
What is SDK?
A realistic DW version for the gov? If we petition now they probably will release it to the public in 50 years. Fingers crossed. I hope i'll live to that age....:shifty:. Yea i want it to be released to the public. But we've got to be more realistic abt what we ask... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.subsim.com/ssr/fixmy688.html |
I wish they did what the Steel Beasts people do: after they make a platform for a military customer, include it in the game via patches!
PD |
Quote:
Cheers Porphy |
I voted no simply because it is something you will never get. It is pretty clear that they have a tech base that they are not willing to give up - why? Because suppose they decide to make a Ticonderoga sim based on this engine, yet someone has already done it? Basically, an SDK is taking money out of their pockets.
-S |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.