![]() |
FOX gets Foxed.
It's high time someone stood up to the "fair & balanced" hackery propaganda channel, and gave them what they deserve. Nothing.
Quote:
Also must tip the hat to Mr. Obama for showing some backbone and dismissing a CBC event due to the lack of integrity of it's co-sponser. Admirable move for a man in his position.... |
Liberals can't argue their positions, so they're running away!
(I wonder how obvious one has to be here sometimes) Good show Clinton/Obama! |
"Democrats have been under pressure from liberal activists to avoid Fox-hosted debates. Last month, the Nevada Democratic Party canceled a debate that Fox was to co-sponsor in August."
Criticisms of Fox aside, I don't see why their debate would be any worse than any others, or why "liberal activists" would bring pressure on candidates to avoid it. That said, I despise televised "debates" in general; I would rather see candidates actually debate the issues than answer newspeoples' loaded questions. |
Quote:
I would actually prefer that the Dems go into FOX's house, and call them out on live TV. Stare the lion in the face, so to speak. Show some back bone and some convicitons. However, I think this is a good thing too. It sends the right message. There was no real pressure on the campaigns to do this, and I find that to be a positive sign. FOX has been getting away with their PR campaign for the right for waaaaay too long, despite all the charges abound that the media is a liberal one. It's high time someone called them on their BS, and the fact that Edwards led the charge, and they did so in a dignified manner is encouraging. At the very least it makes FOX look like what they are, and not what they portray themselves to be... |
I wonder how many people here will decry the republicans refusing to debate on CBS for the same reasons?
|
I would.
CBS/Fox = apples/oranges. CBS isnt guilty of being the mouthpiece for the democratic party. FOX goes as far as adjusting its storyboard headlines to fit with the rights agenda or cause. it's dispicable. The republicans refused to take part in Moveon.org's debates last time around. In that case, I agreed with their decision completely. Calling out Moveon was one thing. Calling out a major TV netwrok is quite another... |
Quote:
Or the CBS correspondent who called MacCain disgraceful? That CBS? Or the CBS whose Andy Rooney on 60 minutes last month said that today's US military is made out of 'losers'? That CBS? What liberal bias? Can't be! P'shaw! Apples and oranges. |
Ahh, if the shoe fits, as you say! |
never mind AL beat me to it
|
Fox just sounds like "propaganda" because it is the only station to sing a different tune than all the liberal news stations.
None of them do a very good job though. I don't watch it anymore. Nothing but Anna Nicole this and Britney Spear's bald head that. Thats not news! How about showing Iraq and not just the bad either. I hate stations that seek to make our military men look bad. Why not show the good that has been done as well? Now theres selective news for you. Right now I guess our whole military is made up of baby eating, torturing shxt heads. I guess all muslims are our friends, cause no true muslim would blow themselves up. I guess George Bush is an evil evil man who has started his war on terror just for oil. I guess Sadam was a tough man who had the right to rule his country how he wanted. Wrong.:doh: Sorry, I was raised better than that. |
From the Project for Excellence in Journalism, State Of The Media 2004:
Quote:
|
Washington post aren't covering themselves in glory either - http://atrios.blogspot.com/2007_04_0...95681241609223
and http://mathaba.net/news/?x=553234 I can't take anyone seriously who believes that the American mass media are biased in a certain direction. |
Is there any neutral, unbiased reporting left (or at least not so pro one side)??? It seems the media is taking sides in political debates and it's getting hard to see throught the PR spin thats put on everything.
I saw it here in the state election in Australia, one news group was pro one side, the other newsgroup the rivals. It's getting said watching this, I'm hoping there will be some enlightenment, but I'm not hopeful.:cry: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I have watched enough of FOX News to see through their technique. If you watch closely you'll notice that they'll say something decidedly right wing or biased by asking it as a question. Whenever theres a panel if theres a token liberal its usually an agreeable middle of the road commentator that doesn't argue. And any station that features Ann Coulter regularly and hosts Bill O'Reily is suspect to me. This is an old but familiar story: A study by the Program on International Policy Attitudes, in the Winter 03-04 issue of Political Science Quarterly, reported that viewers of the Fox Network local affiliates or Fox News were more likely than viewers of other news networks to hold three views which the authors labeled as misperceptions :
I'd say that suggests rather broad misinformation. Quote:
Don't forget the handshake. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...m_rumsfeld.jpg |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.