SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Britain's naval power on the skids (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=105878)

STEED 02-17-07 07:37 AM

Britain's naval power on the skids
 
Thank you Mr Blair and Mr Brown for being a swine to our Navy.

Navy chief calls for £1bn boost or become 'Belgium'

The way things are going.........................:damn:

Oberon 02-17-07 08:13 AM

Mweh, won't be long before Russia's navy is in better condiction than ours....hell...it probably already is!! :damn: :damn:

To think that we used to rule the waves :nope: :nope: :nope: :nope: :nope:

AJ! 02-17-07 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberon
To think that we used to rule the waves :nope: :nope: :nope: :nope: :nope:

that was the first thing i thought when i saw that news....

mr chris 02-17-07 10:16 AM

A complete shoddy state of afairs. :nope::nope::nope::nope::nope::nope:
It complete outrages me that defence spending is cut year on year and the armed forces never get the best kit that money can buy and yet the nation and the Govement expects the armed forces to do more and more year on year.
People in power need to take a look in the mirror.:yep::yep:
BTW. The Austrailians spend a hight percentage of there GDP on there armed forces than we do!!!!
And we are supossed to be the big daddy of the comonwealth do me a favour:damn::damn::nope::nope:

loynokid 02-17-07 10:21 AM

Advice
 
Im from the US...

if you want your naval forces in a better state, then you better stop electing people like brown and blair into office. A Conservative Cantidate would increase military funding far more than a liberal one would. Look at George Bush. Most of the world hates him, but he has increased funding to the US's armed forces by about 300 percent.

mr chris 02-17-07 10:34 AM

Well the problem is that the UK is full of lilly livered Liberals and PC fools and would rather wast money on pandering to the views of select few. Rather than bring the armed forces to the 21st century.

STEED 02-17-07 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr chris
Well the problem is that the UK is full of lilly livered Liberals and PC fools and would rather wast money on pandering to the views of select few. Rather than bring the armed forces to the 21st century.

Don't look at me. As you all know I am bloody sick of these wet liberals and PC Loonies, the problem is a lot of people have forgot how to think for themselves and can not see this stinking government is all smoke and mirrors. And if that swine Brown get's in, say good bye to your money as Brown will bring in more and more tax in. :damn:

No wonder are armed forces are bleed white. I got more respect for are armed forces in Iraq than that stinking lot of scum who sit on there fat backsides in Westminster.

mr chris 02-17-07 02:18 PM

Aye Steed that statement was not aimed at you at all mate. But the people who it was know who they are.:nope:
As i have said before the UK needs more poeple like yourself mate. Then maybe us members of HM Armed forces might get the funding and kit we need to keep the country safe and do all the jobs that seem to keep poping up.

Tchocky 02-17-07 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loynokid
Im from the US...

if you want your naval forces in a better state, then you better stop electing people like brown and blair into office. A Conservative Cantidate would increase military funding far more than a liberal one would. Look at George Bush. Most of the world hates him, but he has increased funding to the US's armed forces by about 300 percent.

Um, wars cost more than peace. And haven't benefits for soldiers been cut, terms of duty extended?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberon
To think that we used to rule the waves :nope: :nope: :nope: :nope: :nope:

A large empire needs policing. At the time, a strong navy was the only way to go, and it worked. Maintaining a similiar force in this day and age would be prohibitively expensive. THere's only so much tax a government can take in, and I for one would prefer to see it spent on schools & hospitals. The new subs (delavyed as the are) and the CVF will go a long way towards improving Britains naval capabilities.

Quote:

Originally Posted by STEED
And if that swine Brown get's in, say good bye to your money as Brown will bring in more and more tax in. :damn:

GB has done an awful lot for the UK economy since the turn of the century, I can't see that changing if he moves house to No 10. Unemployment is low, growth is steady and stable, and inflation isn't a problem (around 2%). He's taken the wrong approach to the NHS though, just chucking money at it won't solve anything.

bigboywooly 02-17-07 02:42 PM

Now answer this one
How can inflation be at 2% or whatever when local governments increase council tax at around 10-12%
Electric and Gas companies have increased prices at around the same figure if not higher

True wars cost more than peace but only cos of ordinance used
You still have to pay the armed forces whether they are sat in Aldershot or Iraq
The airforce still fly and ships still sail

What ships and airforce we have that is

The problem is the conservatives wont be a great deal better

All much of a muchness
:nope:

Tchocky 02-17-07 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigboywooly
Now answer this one
How can inflation be at 2% or whatever when local governments increase council tax at around 10-12%
Electric and Gas companies have increased prices at around the same figure if not higher

Because inflation isn't a composite of council tax and energy bills. I can't answer for local governments in the UK, I don't live there. Inflation rates differ across sectors. Medical inflation, for example, is at around 10%. This is why throwing a 9% increase at the Health budget has no effect.
Have you noticed the war(s) in the Middle East, and the possibility of war with Iran? Any sort of global instability results in oil price rises, which fuel worldwide inflation

Quote:

True wars cost more than peace but only cos of ordinance used
You still have to pay the armed forces whether they are sat in Aldershot or Iraq
The airforce still fly and ships still sail
I was answering loynokid's post about American military spending. An increase in expenditure says f-all about increase in capability.
True, armed forces always cost money. But I hardly think Geroge Bush would be asking for emergency appropriations bills amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars if all the US had going on were exercises.
Wars cost a hell of a lot more than peace and it's not just due to ammunition usage.

mr chris 02-17-07 02:54 PM

All i will say is that the army is very short of cash.:yep::yep:
My regiment has had to cancel two exersises this year alone as we have run out of cash and we can not do fark all about it till April.

Bort 02-17-07 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loynokid
Im from the US...

if you want your naval forces in a better state, then you better stop electing people like brown and blair into office. A Conservative Cantidate would increase military funding far more than a liberal one would. Look at George Bush. Most of the world hates him, but he has increased funding to the US's armed forces by about 300 percent.

Umm..that is simply not true.
The US Navy has actually fallen quite dramatically in force numbers (across the board, ships aircraft and personell) under Bush and the Republicans. As some have mentioned, the vast majority of that money is going towards the war(s). You should also check this out:http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...future/agenda/
the conflicting Defense plans of Al Gore and Dubya during the 2000 election before 9/11. Al Gore wanted to increase the defense budget by more than twice the amount Bush did. Being liberal or conservative has nothing to do with it, plenty of liberal governments have increased spending and plenty of conservative governments have pared it back.:roll:

ASWnut101 02-17-07 08:36 PM

Ok, then who cut the Seawolf program?

I'll give you a hint: The congress between the Bushes.

loynokid 02-17-07 08:50 PM

Ok look at this
 
Remember when the US was in the Vietnam war? We lost because our leadership didn't have the guts to fully fund our troops over there and our leaders didnt have the guts to send enough troops. guess who our leaders were. Dems, liberal dems. thats all there is to it. Thats just one example of the trend. Conservatives support the military more than liberals do, there is no more to say, and there is no arguing it, (unless you are from california... lol):know:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.