![]() |
Britain's naval power on the skids
Thank you Mr Blair and Mr Brown for being a swine to our Navy.
Navy chief calls for £1bn boost or become 'Belgium' The way things are going.........................:damn: |
Mweh, won't be long before Russia's navy is in better condiction than ours....hell...it probably already is!! :damn: :damn:
To think that we used to rule the waves :nope: :nope: :nope: :nope: :nope: |
Quote:
|
A complete shoddy state of afairs. :nope::nope::nope::nope::nope::nope:
It complete outrages me that defence spending is cut year on year and the armed forces never get the best kit that money can buy and yet the nation and the Govement expects the armed forces to do more and more year on year. People in power need to take a look in the mirror.:yep::yep: BTW. The Austrailians spend a hight percentage of there GDP on there armed forces than we do!!!! And we are supossed to be the big daddy of the comonwealth do me a favour:damn::damn::nope::nope: |
Advice
Im from the US...
if you want your naval forces in a better state, then you better stop electing people like brown and blair into office. A Conservative Cantidate would increase military funding far more than a liberal one would. Look at George Bush. Most of the world hates him, but he has increased funding to the US's armed forces by about 300 percent. |
Well the problem is that the UK is full of lilly livered Liberals and PC fools and would rather wast money on pandering to the views of select few. Rather than bring the armed forces to the 21st century.
|
Quote:
No wonder are armed forces are bleed white. I got more respect for are armed forces in Iraq than that stinking lot of scum who sit on there fat backsides in Westminster. |
Aye Steed that statement was not aimed at you at all mate. But the people who it was know who they are.:nope:
As i have said before the UK needs more poeple like yourself mate. Then maybe us members of HM Armed forces might get the funding and kit we need to keep the country safe and do all the jobs that seem to keep poping up. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Now answer this one
How can inflation be at 2% or whatever when local governments increase council tax at around 10-12% Electric and Gas companies have increased prices at around the same figure if not higher True wars cost more than peace but only cos of ordinance used You still have to pay the armed forces whether they are sat in Aldershot or Iraq The airforce still fly and ships still sail What ships and airforce we have that is The problem is the conservatives wont be a great deal better All much of a muchness :nope: |
Quote:
Have you noticed the war(s) in the Middle East, and the possibility of war with Iran? Any sort of global instability results in oil price rises, which fuel worldwide inflation Quote:
True, armed forces always cost money. But I hardly think Geroge Bush would be asking for emergency appropriations bills amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars if all the US had going on were exercises. Wars cost a hell of a lot more than peace and it's not just due to ammunition usage. |
All i will say is that the army is very short of cash.:yep::yep:
My regiment has had to cancel two exersises this year alone as we have run out of cash and we can not do fark all about it till April. |
Quote:
The US Navy has actually fallen quite dramatically in force numbers (across the board, ships aircraft and personell) under Bush and the Republicans. As some have mentioned, the vast majority of that money is going towards the war(s). You should also check this out:http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...future/agenda/ the conflicting Defense plans of Al Gore and Dubya during the 2000 election before 9/11. Al Gore wanted to increase the defense budget by more than twice the amount Bush did. Being liberal or conservative has nothing to do with it, plenty of liberal governments have increased spending and plenty of conservative governments have pared it back.:roll: |
Ok, then who cut the Seawolf program?
I'll give you a hint: The congress between the Bushes. |
Ok look at this
Remember when the US was in the Vietnam war? We lost because our leadership didn't have the guts to fully fund our troops over there and our leaders didnt have the guts to send enough troops. guess who our leaders were. Dems, liberal dems. thats all there is to it. Thats just one example of the trend. Conservatives support the military more than liberals do, there is no more to say, and there is no arguing it, (unless you are from california... lol):know:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.