DVI vs. analog
 

My new monitor has a DVI output and I realized my video card also has a DVI port. I had never given it any thought before with my old monitor. My new one, however, did not come with a DVI cable. What I'm wondering is, is there a noticeable improvement with DVI over analog displays? I don't want to spend $15 on a DVI cable only to find out the display isn't all the better.

I've never really seen it to have much of an impact, although in theory it's supposed to make the images more crisp. I think a lot of it is opinion. Below is some mild propaganda for you.

SOURCE: http://www.flattvpeople.com/tutorial...onnections.asp

DVI lacks the interferance associated with the analog cable. Always use DVI if at all possible.

It is noticeable since there is no ghosting. I've tried both ways on my Samsung monitors.

-S

As others have already suggested, a DVI cable technically provides a crisper image as it is digital. In reality analog signal processing today has improved greatly, to the point where significant differences in image quality can be challenging to detect. Pro photographers, graphics pros or similar would undoubtedly notice a difference because of the equipment they use and the nature of their work. That said, I'd still recommend using a DVI cable for a digital LCD. Why use an analog cable in your digital system if you're no longer connecting to an analog CRT?

It does seem to look a bit better using the DVI cables on a digital LCD monitor, but I certainly understand Syxx Killers concern, because those friggin cables are way overpriced to say the least. :nope: :yep:

$15 is cheap. They used to be $80!

True, the price has come down a lot. Also, many of todays LCDs come packaged with DVI and analog cables. I had DVI cables packaged with both of my LCD displays.

Just thought I'd mention there are different types of DVI connectors:

DVI-D is the real digital connection.
DVI-A (quite rare) is analog, and has no real benefit over a standard VGA cable.
DVI-D is a combination cable that combines DVI-D and DVI-A into a single cable.

There is also Single Link and Dual Link cables....unless your running a really high resolution screen that requires dual-link there is no benefit to using a dual-link cable.

In my experience I noticed little difference between DVI-D, DVI-A and VGA on a Viewsonic VP2130b 21" LCD (hooked to a GeForce 7950GT), whether watching movies, playing FPS games, or playing with photos. I do notice more difference on a second Viewsonic 17" LCD on the same card...

If you buy a DVI cable, make sure it really is a digital cable; when I used a DVI-I cable my screen came up analog... I had to get a proper digital cable to finally get it to run digital mode.

Well yes, that is a lot better. Last time I had looked it was around $35 for 6'.

I have a friend who is using the digital cable and he claims it is no different. With that, I kept mine with the analog. I'm happy.

I'm using a DVI to VGA adaptor on my video card as I still have a VGA monitor (my Video card has a low profile bracket, so I had to remove the VGA socket) I'll use the DVI adaptor when I get a new monitor:up:

My actual experience is that I origianlly had an analog cable hooked up to my Samsung and it looked great, but it was so ever not perfectly clear, even though you probably wouldn't notice upon using the machine. It is the text really. Switching to the DVI cable, though you wouldn't notice it right off, it fixed the ever so slight ghosting of the text to the point where it is perfect and no longer bothersome.

Though you may not notice it, it is way easier on the eyes. The other way could give you a slight headache without you even knowing it. The DVI however removes that issue.

My suggestion is - buy the cable and if you think it doesn't make any difference (unlikely), then take it back. I can almost bet that you will end up keeping it however.

No matter what is written above - there is 'always' a loss on conversion in any format. In this case you are converting from D to A and back to D. This wouldn't be an issue if you were staying A. So any noise generated in the analog line is going to be transfered back to D, leaving you with ever so slight ghosting that you can barely see or worse. On top of this, there is guaranteed to be 'some', but probably not enough to be noticeable, color loss. Its how electronics work. In a pure D to D environment, you get none of these issues.

Hopefully that explains it a bit better.

-S