![]() |
Zzzzz....[snore].....
Then I woke up and found I was STILL trying to solve what I had been trying to do in that [bleep] Nuke Boat.
'Up to your neck in Nazi's... and somebody throws a bucket of Nuke Boat at your head' [obvious paraphrase..] "COME ON.... SILENT HUNTER FOUR !!" Reminds me of the Eight Ball player trying to stay awake at a Billiards match. "Come **ON** SH4" ..... Save me from a nodding death in Nukes.... Do I have to torch off my F/A-18 again this soon ? Maybe it's time to re-watch my World Cup 2006 tapes... Snow is still on and I gotta do SOMETHING.. to keep my marble rolling straight ! COB |
your in for a long spring
|
Man. I hope not. I sent the Supply Officer to get SH4... with FIVE (5) cans of coffee! [The standard 'bribe' currency for Come-Shaw...]
Watching paint dry is more exciting than that Nuke Boat Game... COB |
Seems modern undersea warfare leaves something to desired.....like perhaps a modern undersea war to be based on?! That's my biggest beef with them. With a few tiny exceptions the back story is always hypothetical or based on some well-known work of fiction.
|
Yup... I've watched the boomers go by, from the Hood Canal Bridge... LOTs of 'boat' there. I know a few of the squids... 'dive', go on Zulu time... come up 'X' days later.
Some life.... |
Quote:
|
Yeah...it's kinda ironic. If World War Two had never transpired, doubtless it would have been a wonderful thing for the human race. But I doubt a software developer sixty to seventy years later would be too interested in creating simulations based on what those subs/tanks/planes might have done if employed in war all those years ago. It's the combat history that piques the interest. (Plus, they probably would have gotten it wrong). :D
|
Quote:
Personally I'd love to be able to fly some combat missions in an OU-2 Corsair but unless someone makes a Banana Wars sim it just ain't gonna happen. There is some sim action for the planes of the '50-'70s with Strike Fighters, but again they're all hypothetical wars and of more recent memory. In 30 years I doubt there'll be much interest in Starfighters and Furies either. Definately see your point. |
Quote:
If it wasnt for WW2 the TRS-80 would be state of the art today.(I am saying that computer technology would be at least 20-30 years behind) |
I like modern subsims. They are intricate, and complicated. Much more like chess than WWII sims.
|
Chess... Yeah, that's exactly what I mean... 'Thinking Man's Game'. Which, may be the exactly correct Gaming Challenge for a better 'gamer' than me. *I* feel 'stuck', awaiting The Blue Pacific !
|
|
Quote:
|
Oh... I know. I'm just sorta lamenting my own failings at liking the 'detail' of DW, while announcing my eagerness for SH4........ hopefully in a slightly entertaining manner. Notice... it's MY failing, NOT DW or anything about it... I guess I could go out and shovel snow... Naaaaa..... Maybe sip three or four Heineken's, click my heels, and man the Sea Bridge of that Type II... It may come to that...
|
I've always been surprised a game hasn't been modeled on the Korean War and MiG Alley and all that. I always thought that would be cool. Bridges at Toko Ri kind of thing. Oh, well.
And I share some of your sentiments about DW. I like it well enough, and I've learned a heck of a lot about modern naval warfare after buying it. But it can be a snoozer, imo, thanks to the "fantasy" missions involved rather than using history as a model. History, that is, in the form of a war like WWII. I like the subs in DW okay enough, I guess, though they are uber powerful. *Yawn* Yep, I'm waiting on SH4 too.... :lol: |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.