![]() |
China Gets a Carrier...And Su-33's
http://www.sinodefence.com/news/2006/news06-10-24.asp
Well, it looks like this all but makes it official, the Chinese are definately getting into the tailhook business. The ex-varyag is currently being refitted to become China's first aircraft carrier and now they're buying some very capable aircraft to operate from their new birdfarm. |
Sorry:oops: Somehow I accidentally started two threads. Could the mods please delete this one, thanks.:damn:
|
That huge rusting piece of floating steel is getting operational? Man, I sure wouldn't want to serve on it.....A hard landing SU-33 would problably put holes in the flight deck:lol: ....... It's like 30 years old, a pushover sent to china by USSR (Russia).
|
With the overhaul it's going through I doubt it will be very rusty anymore. More important, I think the Chinese are viewing Varyag as a stepping stone to a bigger, better fleet of indigenously designed flattops.
|
Varyag pierside.
Just NNW of the "default" location you'll see some blue buildings next to the water. There she is just north of them. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Also consider that Kitty Hawk was launched in 1960, making her 46 years old, the Enterprise was launched in 1961, making her 45, and JFK was launched in 1967, making her 40. Nimitz was launched in 1974, making her 32 years old. I wouldn't consider any of these carriers a "pushover" in any sense of the world. |
I'm thinking it takes a lot more than buying an aircraft carrier and 50 airplanes to make a viable threat. Ask the US Navy what it takes to put a carrier to sea as a viable fighting force.
|
I wonder if the Ukrainians will demandcompansation for breech of contract, as they said it would be turned into a casino.
It will need some engines to be installes as the Ukrainians removed them before handing the ship over. I don't think a rubber band attached to the propeller count's as an engine!:lol: |
Quote:
|
The varyag is acctualy not 30 years old nearing it but hasnt hit it yet, the kuznetsov class are 60,000 tonne air craft carrying cruisers, but the chinese let her get in a bit of a state she needs four engines and four propellors.
Her SS-N-19 missiles can be taken out and hanger increased but as a first carrier well its a good one seeing as america started off with less and built up to what it is. The enterprise was built in 1961 so your trying to say any carrier older than 30 is not worth anything i think that puts about 6 american carriers out of use then. |
That. Is. C-R-A-Z-Y. It doesn't have a catapult? Woah, dude. That totally brings back memories of Doolittle's Raiders.
It's entirely possible they might "retrofit" some low power pistons on there. The system isn't all that complex, but it needs it's own boiler, and the water-brake and piston require some tight tolerances to keep the steam losses minimal. About the only "country" China will invade is Taiwan, and they're not going to do it haphazardly. They know their economy will take a gigantic flying flop if they do it militarily. |
Quote:
-S |
My bet is that the Chinese are building their own carrier somewhere, maybe in different locations in modular form. I know people make fun of Russian and Chinese equipment but theyare no fools. In fact I bet quality wise the chinese might be quite good. I have read that license built Su-27s made in China are of better quality than Russian ones.
|
i thought the Chinese were simply studying the overall design to build there own and retrofit that ship as a trainer. makes more sense then pushing it into a combat status after years of neglect and so much missing equipment.
but its going to be another decade until the UK gets its 65,000t CVf's leaving us with the invincible's that are getting close to 30 years old, but they are (hopefully) better maintained. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.