SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Proof Bush Stole the Election (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=97799)

SubSerpent 09-07-06 09:17 AM

Proof Bush Stole the Election
 
This makes me sick to my stomach. :nope:

What a rip off! :nope:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZl12jrdhU0



United States of America = One corrupt nation under God!

August 09-07-06 12:12 PM

Wah wah sour grapes. If the Dems hadn't spent so much time trying recount only some counties instead of all of them while trying to get the thousands of military servicemen absentee ballots discounted maybe they would have won.

SkvyWvr 09-07-06 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by August
Wah wah sour grapes. If the Dems hadn't spent so much time trying recount only some counties instead of all of them while trying to get the thousands of military servicemen absentee ballots discounted maybe they would have won.

Exactly.

Bort 09-07-06 01:11 PM

Quote:

Wah wah sour grapes. If the Dems hadn't spent so much time trying recount only some counties instead of all of them while trying to get the thousands of military servicemen absentee ballots discounted maybe they would have won.
I really wouldn't care about the results of an election that happened six years ago, however, if it had gone the other way, America and the World would have been better off.

SubSerpent 09-07-06 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by *[FOX]* Bort
Quote:

Wah wah sour grapes. If the Dems hadn't spent so much time trying recount only some counties instead of all of them while trying to get the thousands of military servicemen absentee ballots discounted maybe they would have won.
I really wouldn't care about the results of an election that happened six years ago, however, if it had gone the other way, America and the World would have been better off.

It's never too late to bring them up on charges! What a long list that would be. I hope the bastard gets found guilty on every count of corruption there is. He belongs in a cold, damp, prison cell right next to Bin Laden and Sadaam. :rock:

August 09-07-06 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SubSerpent
Quote:

Originally Posted by *[FOX]* Bort
Quote:

Wah wah sour grapes. If the Dems hadn't spent so much time trying recount only some counties instead of all of them while trying to get the thousands of military servicemen absentee ballots discounted maybe they would have won.
I really wouldn't care about the results of an election that happened six years ago, however, if it had gone the other way, America and the World would have been better off.

It's never too late to bring them up on charges! What a long list that would be. I hope the bastard gets found guilty on every count of corruption there is. He belongs in a cold, damp, prison cell right next to Bin Laden and Sadaam. :rock:

You can hope all you want but he isn't going to be charged since the election was completely valid.

The Avon Lady 09-07-06 02:35 PM

http://img455.imageshack.us/img455/5...2363a2mik5.jpg

August 09-07-06 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by *[FOX]* Bort
I really wouldn't care about the results of an election that happened six years ago, however, if it had gone the other way, America and the World would have been better off.

You really think so? The Democrats haven't successfully fought a war since WW2. What makes you believe they would have done any better now?

Sea Demon 09-07-06 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by August
Quote:

Originally Posted by *[FOX]* Bort
I really wouldn't care about the results of an election that happened six years ago, however, if it had gone the other way, America and the World would have been better off.

You really think so? The Democrats haven't successfully fought a war since WW2. What makes you believe they would have done any better now?

Exactly. And we see how the Democrats respond to terrorist attacks. They do nothing. And the threat builds. The WTC gets hit, the khobar towers get hit, the embassies get hit, the USS Cole gets hit.....and no response from the Democrats. Sit on your hands. :nope: Oh and don't forget about Jamie Gorelick tying the hands of intelligence agencies, not allowing for the sharing of information between agencies.

This video is a sham. Intended to ignite passions on false premises. How many times did they recount the votes?....and still Bush came out on top. 5 times IIRC. And then Bush gets more votes the second time around (2004)than any President in U.S. history. :lol: Wah, wah, wah. I can't believe people are still whining about this "election 2000" situation.

Bort 09-07-06 02:56 PM

Quote:

You really think so? The Democrats haven't successfully fought a war since WW2. What makes you believe they would have done any better now?
I would think that the fact that during both World Wars we were led by Democrats would be something that a Republican wouldn't want to bring up, nevertheless you have and therefore I must give you guys big props on Grenada, Panama, and the Gulf War- phew those were rough ones! Your record ain't that great with the other wars you've led, Nixon made the decision to leave Vietnam and so far you aren't doing so well with the current wars either, but boy, Grenada, bang up job there!:D

Sea Demon 09-07-06 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by *[FOX]* Bort
Quote:

You really think so? The Democrats haven't successfully fought a war since WW2. What makes you believe they would have done any better now?
I would think that the fact that during both World Wars we were led by Democrats would be something that a Republican wouldn't want to bring up, nevertheless you have and therefore I must give you guys big props on Grenada, Panama, and the Gulf War- phew those were rough ones! Your record ain't that great with the other wars you've led, Nixon made the decision to leave Vietnam and so far you aren't doing so well with the current wars either, but boy, Grenada, bang up job there!:D

Ah. The Democrat Party today is nothing like the party of Roosevelt, Truman or Kennedy. Those were Democrats who would stand up to tyrants. Not appease them like today's Democratic Party. Or in some cases, helping our enemies like the editors at the New York Times who outlined how we were tracing the funding of some of the Islamic murderers. :nope:

And today's war would go alot better if the liberal establishment wouldn't hamper every effort to win it. The second we enter any conflict, there they are calling for an exit strategy. How about winning? Thank God today's Democratic Party wasn't around during WW2.

Bort 09-07-06 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sea Demon
Quote:

Originally Posted by *[FOX]* Bort
Quote:

You really think so? The Democrats haven't successfully fought a war since WW2. What makes you believe they would have done any better now?
I would think that the fact that during both World Wars we were led by Democrats would be something that a Republican wouldn't want to bring up, nevertheless you have and therefore I must give you guys big props on Grenada, Panama, and the Gulf War- phew those were rough ones! Your record ain't that great with the other wars you've led, Nixon made the decision to leave Vietnam and so far you aren't doing so well with the current wars either, but boy, Grenada, bang up job there!:D

Ah. The Democrat Party today is nothing like the party of Roosevelt, Truman or Kennedy. Those were Democrats who would stand up to tyrants. Not appease them like today's Democratic Party. Or in some cases, helping our enemies like the editors at the New York Times who outlined how we were tracing the funding of some of the Islamic murderers. :nope:

And today's war would go alot better if the liberal establishment wouldn't hamper every effort to win it. The second we enter any conflict, there they are calling for an exit strategy. How about winning? Thank God today's Democratic Party wasn't around during WW2.

I entirely disagree with the assertion that today's democratic party is somehow different than the donkeys of WW2. The party has changed, primarily by booting out the southern racists that were once a core part of its constituency, however those charming fellows have found a new home, in the Republican party. Indeed the GOP of today plays on their fear of minorities by claiming that illegal aliens are spilling over the borders to threaten their white bread society. They also claim that there are insidious elements seeking to destroy their ultra conservative christian way of life by bringing it into the 21st century. I'm glad that the party of Roosevelt has evolved to become an inclusive body seeking better quality of life and security for all Americans, as well as maintaining a respectful image for America abroad. How awful!

bradclark1 09-07-06 05:05 PM

Quote:

And today's war would go alot better if the liberal establishment wouldn't hamper every effort to win it. The second we enter any conflict, there they are calling for an exit strategy. How about winning?
Gimme a break. The fact is we could be there ten years from now irregardless of which party is in power and the only difference between today and then will be the calender date. Bush bit off more then "we" can chew. No WMD and the terror showed up after we liberated Iraq. The U.S. imported the terror to Iraq. Now Afganistan is heating up and we don't have the force to do much about it and that was the main reason we went over there in the first place. Are we dumb a$$es or what?
While Bush in Crawford grilling steaks with his good ole boy's our guys will still be dying. Isn't that swell?

Yahoshua 09-07-06 05:26 PM

(eats popcorn)

Sea Demon 09-07-06 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by *[FOX]* Bort
I entirely disagree with the assertion that today's democratic party is somehow different than the donkeys of WW2.

They are different. Today's Democrat Party are appeasers of the first degree. There was a time when Democrats stood up to tyranny. That is no longer true. The Democrat Party is making it alot easier for our enemies to operate, unfortunately. J.F. Kennedy was a tax-cutter and very pro private sector-growth. No they are not the same.

Quote:

Indeed the GOP of today plays on their fear of minorities by claiming that illegal aliens are spilling over the borders to threaten their white bread society.
You would certainly be surprised if you looked at me and my skin color. ;)

Sea Demon 09-07-06 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bradclark1
Gimme a break. The fact is we could be there ten years from now irregardless of which party is in power and the only difference between today and then will be the calender date.

Nope. Democrats have proven they have no will to fight terrorists. Their entire strategy now is to surrender and disgracefully leave before we have any stability in Iraq. That takes time, and the Democrat Party has shown they don't have the fortitude to do it.

Quote:

No WMD and the terror showed up after we liberated Iraq.
Right. There was no 9/11. There was no Khobar Towers incident. There was no WTC attack in 1993. The USS Cole was never attacked. The Marine barracks were never attacked in Lebanon, etc., etc., etc. If you're talking about Iraq itself, it depends on how you describe terror. You might want to ask the Kurds about that one. And maybe the Israeli's about how their terrorist enemies were being payed by Saddam.

And only George Bush said anything regarding Saddams weapons programs before the Iraq invasion. :roll: Right.

BTW, have you bothered to read the Iraq War resolution? It doesn't look like you have. That might give you a clue why we went there. Internet liberal blogs leave alot to be desired.

August 09-07-06 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by *[FOX]* Bort
Quote:

You really think so? The Democrats haven't successfully fought a war since WW2. What makes you believe they would have done any better now?
I would think that the fact that during both World Wars we were led by Democrats would be something that a Republican wouldn't want to bring up, nevertheless you have and therefore I must give you guys big props on Grenada, Panama, and the Gulf War- phew those were rough ones! Your record ain't that great with the other wars you've led, Nixon made the decision to leave Vietnam and so far you aren't doing so well with the current wars either, but boy, Grenada, bang up job there!:D

First off Bort, I'm not a Republican. FWIW my voting record since the Carter administration is pretty much evenly split between them and the Democrats, along with any half decent Independant i see on the ballot.

Second as for the World Wars, imo we shouldn't have gotten involved in the first one and shouldn't have had to step into the last one, though FDR did a pretty fine job of leading us through it, displaying a backbone not seen in any Democrat chief exec since with the possible exception of JFK.

However you're right, Grenada, Panama and Desert Storm, all relatively bloodless wins, especially compared with the massive Democrat screwups in Vietnam and Korea. Nor has their post 'Nam war record been any brighter with bungling from Iran to Somalia to Yugoslavia with little one could call success

Taken as a whole the modern Democrats are wishy-washy and quite willing to leave messes for their successors to deal with, and i'm including the WTC attacks in that.
So yeah given that war record i'd say i'm pretty glad the GoP was in the majority in this one. I don't agree with with everything they've done, but on the whole I believe they've done a pretty good job so far.

August 09-07-06 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sea Demon
You would certainly be surprised if you looked at me and my skin color. ;)

Watch out man. You know how the Democrats won't tolerate anyone of color that doesn't tow their party line.

The Noob 09-07-06 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SubSerpent
This makes me sick to my stomach. :nope:

What a rip off! :nope:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZl12jrdhU0



United States of America = One corrupt nation under God!

HOLY MUCK!:huh:

Now you got your Proof that Bush is a Lair. Who lies once, can do it again. And Again!

A little thing i made up, if moderators find it too much Offensive Remove it.

I just think it fits good to this event.

To the Tune of "Der Fuehrers Face".

Americas National anthem, inofficial Version

When Bush says, "We ist der master race"
We HEIL! HEIL! Right in Bush's face
Not to love Georgie is a great disgrace
So we HEIL! HEIL! Right in Bush's face



When Condi says, "We own der world und space"
We HEIL! HEIL! Right in Frau Condolizas face
When Herr Rumsfeld says they'll never bomb this place
We HEIL! HEIL! Right in Herr Rumsfeld's face


Are we not the supermen
American pure supermen
Ja we ist der supermen
Super-duper supermen
Ist this Turbo Capitalist land not good?
Would you leave it if you could?
Ja this Turbo Capitalist land is good!
We would not leave it if we could!


We bring the world to order
Heil Bush's world New Order
Everyone of foreign race will love Der Bush's face
When we bring to der world disorder

When Bush Says We Never will be Slaves! We HEIL! HEIL!
And Still we work like Slaves! When Bush Brags and Lies and Rants and Raves we HEIL! HEIL! and Work into our Graves!


When Herr Bush jells I gonna have more Shells! We HEIL! HEIL! For Him we make more Shells! If one little shell would Blow him right to hell we HEIL! HEIL! And wouldn't that be Swelled?

Are we not Republicans?
Patriot Republicans?
Ja, we ist Republicans!
Neo-con Republicans!
Ist Kalifornia not gut?
Would you leave it if you could?
Ja, Kalifornia is good!
We would not leave it if we could.

When Bush says, "We ist der master race"
We HEIL! HEIL! Right in Bush's face
Not to love Georgie is a great disgrace
So we HEIL! HEIL! Right in Bush face

:rotfl::rotfl:

bradclark1 09-07-06 08:59 PM

Quote:

Nope. Democrats have proven they have no will to fight terrorists. Their entire strategy now is to surrender and disgracefully leave before we have any stability in Iraq. That takes time, and the Democrat Party has shown they don't have the fortitude to do it.
Not one terrorist attack under the democrats was the magnitude of 9/11. Should we hang that on republicans? Then on top of that the given enemy was Afganistan. Now look what is happening, the Taliban is on a comeback and we can't do squat about it? Why? Because the republicans attacked Iraq on top of it before the work was finished in Afganistan and now we are tied down in Iraq. Yeah the republicans are doing a bang up job fighting terror. How many Iraqi's die a day since we liberated them?
So you want a standing U.S. army in Iraq? How long do you think it will fly? Another two or five or ten years? How many years is it worth? Think our all volunteer force is going to stay volunteer? How much can we afford? Our debt is going through the roof. How long can we financialy handle it. How long will voters stand for it?

Can the democrats do any better? I seriously doubt it. Nothing we do can stabilize the region. Our hands would have been more then full enough with Afganistan by itself.

Do I have an idea of what would work? No, I really don't and that's sad. There are no right choices.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.