![]() |
Egypt ferry sinks
egyptian ferry has sunk so far 30 survivors out of 1,400
|
Authorities claim not to have received a distress signal...
I wonder what happened to the EPIRB. Hope it's not the famous "Sucked through the bridge wing" effect. |
shouldnt laugh
but RAF Kilnoss has picked up the distress beacon from the ship and the british were the first to find it |
Terrible news, panicked at first when i heard a cruise ship had gone down as my mom and dad are on one near mexico. Later confirmed as the red sea.
Just out of interest. If a beacon transmits on 121.5 then RAF Kinloss ignore it on the first pass of the sats and wait for a second pass to confirm it. So considering we waited for a second pass, we still were first God bless the queen and her beautiful armed forces :cry: |
now saying 200 people saved
|
http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com...lt-384x256.jpg
Heres what she looked like. Not the prettiest vessel ever, didnt look to stable either, tall and skinny with a vehicle deck that's doors were probably not mainatained too well. Any idea yet as to what cause her loss? |
i have a hunch same as estonia but instead of the bow door its the stern door that fell off flooding the car deck sinking it.
|
I wonder if this will spell the end for RO-RO (roll on, roll of) ferrys, as the papers are already blaming the RO-RO design for the disaster. Personally...I blame the lack of lifeboats! Didn't international law ever learn from the Titanic? You need to have a spot on a lifeboat for each person aboard!
|
Quote:
Modern, safe ships in competent hands are perfectly safe. But from the looks of that ship, i wouldn't have boarded her to cross the red sea if you had payed me. |
Wasn't me, honest
|
I have personaly served on RORO ships, and they are very seaworthy vessels, but yes they do have a few design flaws.
Europe is trying to phase out RORO vessel all together as they constitue a massive saftey issue, in a space of 10 years i can think of three such disasters on RORO ferrys. Scandanavian star Herald of free enterprise Estonia 1987 to 1994 thats 7 years and these three accident took place. |
Quote:
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/mid...st/4680752.stm
I've heard a lot of people comparing this with the Titanic. Just goes to show how little is learnt by some countries nearly 100 years on. |
why exactly did she sink?
|
Survivors are saying that there was a fire aboard, not enough lifeboats, and finally...the crew "hoarded" the life jackets.
|
Quote:
Even though modern ships have little in common with the Titanic. |
Quote:
In the case of the 406MHz EPIRB, that is not necessary. (There are also other problems with 121.5, and it's being phased out as we speak) My old copy of IMO's The GMDSS Handbook claims 121.5 as being primarily aeronautical, but ships have been equipped with them. (Or a combination, as aircrafts can home in on 121.5 MHz). I don't know at the time what kind of beacon the ship had... But it's still weird as heck that the crew didn't send a distress message. Fire on board usually deserves at least an urgency message. I saw an article where, apparently, a nearby ship heard a distress message from the sinking ferry, but the report didn't say much. Still strange that they didn't manage to contact a coast station. |
As i understand;
Any emergency warrenting aid or evacuation of any ship any where should send a mayday distress call, or send a mayday call to another ship and have them relay the message. all it takes is one push of a button and a distress signal can be sent. |
a bit worrying how the RAF discovered the distress beacon before the people it was meant for, hms bulwark was dispatched immediatly but theres not much an assualt ship can do over a day away.
|
Thats why it was it was orderd to turn around.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.