![]() |
Nuclear reactions are smoldering again at Chernobyl
Guess it will do so for hundreds if not thousands of year ahead, if they can't find a way to stop it.
Quote:
Markus |
Them Cherno-Zombies don't want to stay in the cold during winter, you see...:cool:
|
Quote:
Markus |
It's all based upon two things:
1. Critical mass/critical geometry resulting from any shifting of material causing a mass of fissile material to undergo fission again. 2. Decay heat from the fissile material's fission products. They'll continue to produce heat at about 7% of the total power levels immediately prior to the stopping of the fission process. Those fission products will continue to produce heat dependent upon their half-life. That heat needs to be cooled somehow - and that may involve doing things that could inadvertently result in additional fission reactions occurring. |
Quote:
Could it end up with the China syndrome ? Markus |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Markus |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You need to remember that the core has flowed all over the basement as molten corium, so any portions that could fission again are much further away from having enough mass in the right geometry. |
|
^ :haha:
Quote:
Seriously: There is no solution of getting rid of "accidentally" set free 'corium'. B.t.w. "corium" lmao. Fine example of doublespeak. Same as in Fukushima where they release contaminated water into the ocean, and will have to do this for millenia to come. The probem is inherent, and will not go away by wishful thinking. As long as no one can really contain the stuff i will radiate on for millenia. |
Quote:
Trying to recall what was said in the 70's movie China Syndrome. Markus |
Quote:
https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/pic...ictureid=12049 |
I can remember that morning so clearly: Moira and I had just been to look at the house we are now making plans to leave all these years later
We'd spent the night in the VW in a damp meadow next to the river and she was cooking up breakfast while I listened to the news about the explosion on the car radio |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Markus |
Quote:
The article mentions "irradiated uranium", which is pretty strange and suggests that the writer doesn't know enough about the topic. Uranium is always radioactive, it doesn't have any stable isotopes, and it cannot be irradiated. There could be a variety of reasons for the increased neutron count, starting with recently opened leaks/cracks, which would allow water or steam to pass through and carry radioactive material into the range of the sensors. |
Quote:
We have been discussing Chernobyl before, which was the reason behind my idea of posting it here. Markus |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.