![]() |
Another Commercial Space disaster, this one manned
Virgin galactic just reported they lost SpaceShip 2, manned with 2 pilots. Their status is unknown at this time, but chutes were sighted over the Mojave.
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/vir...t-test-n238376 |
CHP is now reporting 1 fatality, 1 major injury.
|
Damn...hope that the crew made it out alright.
|
From space rush to sage brush. A lousy week for space travel. :dead:
http://media.turnto23.com/photo/2014....0_640_480.PNG |
Damn, that's bad news. May he RIP and I hope the other one recovers.
|
:timeout:VG ain't virgin no more.
|
We can only hope that Justin Beber will have the first ride. :D
|
:hmmm:
:nope: |
Quote:
|
Never too soon for Bieber.
|
Sad, but it's not unexpected. Flight testing has never been and never will be risk free.
I just hope that this week's incidents won't put to big a drag on commercial space programs. |
I guess suborbital flight still counts as space flight.
|
Quote:
Gone are the times when America and Russia built a huge single use rocket and blasted things directly into space. Virgin Galactic is developing a ''space plane'' that can fly up there, not ride a booster rocket like the shuttle. To eventually move things into orbit with half the fuel of a shuttle or Soyuz needed. |
I think that you still need to reach orbit in order to deliver anything there.
Meaning that the current space plane by Virgin has very little value apart from getting tourists into "space". That said, maybe some one will make a working space plane, there were many projects (including ones by USSR/Russia) but so far all of them failed. Example: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...С%29.png |
Quote:
|
Quote:
A Wikipedia page on the program. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-20_Dyna-Soar I had not heard of it until reading a book on the development of the Space Shuttle which can to some extent at least trace it linage to this concept. Of course it was a German scientist who first had the idea the goal to make a bomber that could reach the US again of course it never went past the paper stage. Of course this concept is workable in theory and I can see why it is popular again as it is a cheaper alternative.I think the primary issue as you said is that the craft must enter actual orbit to deliver something else in orbit and I doubt this concept can achieve that without costing the as or more than a more traditional method. |
Quote:
Let me look at the United Nations Permanent Commission on When Humour is Appropriate after Accidents (UNPCWHAA). According to the Borat Agreement signed in Kazakhstan in 2006, my comment was just inside the acceptable time frame. So no, not too soon. :D Good question though. :up: |
Will have to bear that in mind the next time one of NASAs manned craft explodes. :yep: :salute:
Need Another Seven Astronauts. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Looks like they were warned about the unstable fuel they were using,
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/vir...say/ar-BBcAgZ9 |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.