![]() |
Obamacare
Don't really care to debate it, just wondering, the govt will start collecting fines from those that opt out, where is this money going? I would assume it's to fund medicare/caid since several million will be joining in, but can't find anything on it. If they are collecting another tax, the question is how will it get spent. I've heard talk of SS and medicare being in a lock box before so congress wouldn't touch it, but we know it all got spent on stupidity.
The fines aren't much 2014, but by 2016 they really get up there, about $700 per adult,$300 per kid, quite a chunk for a married couple with a few kids. Looking on a few forums, poor that have to buy even cheaper insurance, the deductibles are so high, 5-10K, they could hardly use the insurance their being forced to buy. |
No, I don't care for Obama. I doubt he cares for me either, but I haven't made enough noise for him to say anything one way or the other. I don't think he's worried though.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I've heard that a couple of States have good health care systems. While I'm not against this in principle, it's my firm belief is that this is not what we created our Federal Government for. But now I'm straying into your "don't really care to debate it" area, for which I apologize and will stop now. |
Exactly, it's all big joke.The money will no doubt be used to fund more waste. I no longer have health insurance since turned 26, not working while in school.I graduate in in the spring, hopefully can find a job with insurance, unless that is gone and have to get a substandard obamacare plan.Until and employed and have/afford insurance I will hold off.Absolutely will not be forced to buy insurance as the law is illegitimate but will stay away from the debate.They can fine me, I won't pay.Hopefully can stay under radar, if they do send a letter, I have an idea of what my response will be, it involves the letters F and O.
|
Now that some one have posted a thread about this issue I can post a google translated article from a danish newspaper(politiken.dk)
Quote:
When I read this article back in Nov. 2012 it made me think a lot. Markus |
All the part timers at my company were cut in hours, to the point of poverty.
Company don't wanna pay for Obamacare, and would rather saddle the workers, whos hours they killed, and force them to pay for their own, with, and I say again, reduced hours.... And you wonder why people hate the rich/corporations? This Bill is signed and sealed by them, manipulated from a single payer system, to an insurance company boon. Thanks to congress, and thanks to Obama for the zero balls he showed in pushing through the single payer, and not fighting the insurance company lobbyists, who want to keep their policies of overcharging, and not paying out. Why are insurance companies on the stock market? Seriously, once you hit public trading, your focus becomes the shareholder, and not the customer. Insurance used to be protection, now it is just another scam, chock full of fine print. Which is fine if you are Walmart, or McD's, you can choose not to go there... But I am forced to buy car insurance, and am vastly ripped off, forced to buy medical insurance, from companies who did nothing but jack up rates in the past 3 years, since this went through. I live on the Jersey shore, ask us what we are going through with Sandy Damage and insurance companies here!?! If you think this is the spineless Obama, and not the fact our government is bought and paid for by big Bussiness, then I got oceanfront property to sell you in the Czeck Republic. How come people always trash the little man, and not the million/billion $ corporations, who refuse to provide a livable wage, or refuse to help in the social betterment of a nation as a whole. No patriotism in bussiness anymore, none, the prole is expendable. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I agree with everything about obamacare
except the mandate - i should not be penalized and taxed for not buying into a health care program that those in power are exempt from ditch that and im 100% loving it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Looking in the jobs section now, the majority of jobs for hire are part time. US corporations have no patriotism in a global economy. They serve no nation, can move at will to build where work is the cheapest. This creates mass wealth for the few, but cannot sustain a nation. It's the vulture mentality. Obamacare is nothing more than a handout to the elite insurance corporations. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sure, there are a few good things but overall is a garbage law that will harm our system.Of course the long term play is to get us to single payer.When private insurance becomes unaffordable for the vast majority of americans, the idiots in this country will think the evil insurance companies did it and will call for government style healthcare, like the NHS in the UK, which from what I understand is a nightmare. There is a reason congress exempted itself from this monstrosity, they know it is crap. |
Quote:
Taken from Affordable Care Act aka Obamacare. |
Quote:
Still way cheaper than the cost of an insurance policy. |
Quote:
The loophole around this is the law permits employer to keep current coverage if able.The health insurance for congress and their drones(staffers) is staying the same from what I understand so they are in fact exempt.They keep their great health coverage while many people are being dropped due to this law and forced into the "exchanges" . That is the reality of the situation. Premiums are going up in most places and will skyrocket in coming years. |
Quote:
Also this: When the individual mandate is fully phased-in, those who can afford coverage -- which is defined as insurance costing less than 8 percent of their annual income -- but choose to forgo it will have to pay either $695 or 2.5 percent of the annual income, whichever is greater.That fee would be once a year. |
Quote:
|
Apparently in relation to post#7 I have to make an argument as to why what it addresses is stupid and not rely on it being patently obvious that it is stupid.
So here you go Sailor, just for you. The document in question is large and complex, it contains lots of words which have very specific meanings. It directly references a vast array of other lengthy complex documents covering a wide range of subjects and numerous different government departments, all of which also contain lots of words with very specific meanings. The person in question has repeatedly demonstrated an inability to understand the meaning of very basic words. Since much of this document is of a very legalese nature it also requires an ability with legal definitions as well as ordinary word definitions. The person in question has also repeatedly demonstrated that even very basic legal definitions are beyond their ken. On those points alone it is safe to say the claim that was made by bubblehead is utterly and unquestionably false, or to use the technical term ..... complete bull. Numerous references are available on this forum which proves that to be true, if anyone is unfamiliar with any examples they need go no further than the first page of GT to get plenty of samples which prove it without any shadow of a doubt. That should be enough, but as is my habit I will further the point with a question. Throughout the States large numbers of well paid teams of top legal experts have been crawling through this document to try to get a grasp on not only the basics but all the intricate fine details and all their implications and ramifications. After all its a big issue with lots of big money involved. Why are all these corporations paying all those lawyers to try and decipher the complicated maze of legislation if they could just hire bubbles who already understands it perfectly?:hmmm: |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.