California could become the strictest Gun Control State in the Union soon
 

How? Ammunition Registry.

To soon yet to say how it'll pan out but it's a possibility.

SOURCE

In before the crazy posts that almost make me want to kill myself when I'm suffering from depression like I am now.

I've heard about this awhile ago. I think it's completely idiotic for three reasons:

1.) This is just going to drive people to make their ammo purchases out of state. You do not have to be a resident of another state to buy ammo in it.

2.) They're going to lose some tax revenue.

3.) There are many sportsman like my father who really don't pay attention to this stuff. My dad goes upland bird hunting or deer/elk hunting on occasion. The instant people like him ahve to start registering ammo, it's going to get their attention.

I know for fact that If... no scratch that... WHEN this passes, ill probably be buying ammo for relatives. Just this year, I've already purchased almost 750 rounds of handgun ammo so my mom can get her practice in, because the stuff is nearly a dollar a round over there according to her.


As an aside, you can find a complete list of draconian PRC shennigans here:
( All 2013 Gun Legislation )

As for being the most strict, we'll see. The super progressive areas seem to be in a competition with one another as to who can take the biggest crap on peoples constitutional rights.

I'm not surprised. CA is it's own country operating under it's own laws and regulations. :doh:

Well, it ain't called the Peoples Republic of California for no reason at all. :O:

Also known as the PRK by those that prefer to spell California with a K in reference to the former governator i guess. PRC, PRK, same thing. Other nick names is "Cantaffordya". Or you can combine the two, Peoples Reublic of Cantaffordya. As a former resident, I've earned my stripes to critique the place as much as i want.

San Andreas Fault. We gotz it.

You know some day the "Big one" is gonna hit. I just hope my parents retire and move out of that cesspool before it does. When that earthquake hit's, the aftermath is probably gonna make Katrina look like small potato's. While i'm sure the damage to structures and infrastructures will be great, it's the lawlessness that will ensue that worries me most. Places like Pomona and other inner cities are going to be absolute hell holes, and there will be no escape from the state. The freeways will be all but impassable, trapping everyone there.

Yes, one day it will hit. I'm certain it is monitored closely in hopes of making a prediction when it might happen. Preparing ahead helps in the aftermath.

Yep the axe is almost ready to descend here in Massachusetts too. There are a raft of anti-2A bills from liability insurance to outright bans working their way though the legislature.

This reminds me of the flap twenty years ago when someone was proposing putting serial numbers on bullets.
:rotfl2:

Of course one solution is to get a machine and make your own. :sunny:

It goes back much further than that. It's likely to make it look more "German" (i.e. "Nazi"). Don't forget the right-wingers who like to spell the former president's name "Klinton". I know Kalifornia predates that.

Similarly, the phrase "Californicate" is a lot older than the recent TV series. Back in 1972 there was a proposal to allow California to build their own dam in Utah to get the electricity they so desperately needed. Utah would have made money off of the deal, but eventually it was voted down. The phrase even then was "Don't Californicate Utah".

Don't laugh, I'm not sure if it made it into law, but last I heard they are putting microstamp requirements on all handguns.



Reloading. I swear most everyone I know has a bench somewhere in their house.

Ok, i stand corrected. I didn't know that.


Don't Californicate Utah? Now there's a slogan and train of thought I can get behind! :up:

I do not mean this any demeaning way towards anyone who lives there...

Why is this state always the benchmark of liberal?

And despite the failures is always emulated by other states.

I am liberal by belief, but ya mess with guns, you may as well revoke the bill of rights as a whole, see how many happy voices there are then.

When you are forced to quarter troops, or drawn and quartering is an acceptable death, no due process, guillty before proven innocent...

Once you lose one, the others will follow.

Don't listen to me though..I am scum

(I edited spelling here, my whole post is crap)

I'm going guess for two reasons:

1. The PRC tends to pass more progressive laws first.

2. Bay area / San francisco. I think somehow it is the posterchild of liberal progressive for varying reasons. Gay rights movement comes to mind, i think it's the cradle of it.


Which is sad, because the exact opposite should be happening. The state being shown as a shining example of what not to do.

Then among the liberal minded your probably a very small minority. Usually the words "liberal" and "guns" in the same sentence equates to "Anti".

You may find this video interesting.
Rights Versus Privileges

Being silly. I am always being silly, to the point when I am serious It goes as a non sequitor event.:D

Anti guns is a test probe, as it is the easiest to take away in our bill of rights.

Liberal? I do not think grandma should starve to feed the banks, that is my liberalness.

Other than that, a free man should be able to do as he pleases as long as it does not infringe on another rights to life liberty, and the pursuit of happyness.

Maybe that is more libertarian or progressive? Not sure.

But not all Libs wish to kill guns.

*hugs his ar-15*

Your probably more libertarian. Look into it, see if you fit the definition. Myself, I can't say i'm 100% libertarian, but most of my ideals and thoughts lean toward the libertarian camp.

Do yourself a favour laddie, when you have a black day, don't open up GT, stick to the Flightsim forum or General Games. It just ain't worth it.

As a still-active security officer, both plainclothes and uniformed, I'm 50/50 on the issue. As an alarm agent or on duty at a court of appeals, federal housing project, social security office or base police at a now defunct field, the potential to be on the receiving end heightens the senses somewhat in sunny (but loco) CA. and you view the matter from BEHIND the visor slits and kevlar. My solution is to follow the 2nd amendment with its ';' precisely as it states-a "well ordered militia"! Everyone must own and report regularly so the sergeants can sort out the nut cases, tweakers and a schizos,. They do it in Switzerland. I believe old T.J. had this in mind as he was a defacto member of the Monticello militia himself (in case Tecumsah showed up or a John Brown.) Naturally, the village drunk wasn't going to shoulder a musket and in Switzerland absinth is outlawed after a militia man went nuts.:arrgh!:

Pro-gun Dems need to start making more noise in their party.

I'm glad Ruger is moving to our poor county, bringing about 500 jobs and taking over a closed mill, win win. Screw you Ca., NC loves Ruger.

http://www.rceno.com/RCENO/sturm-rug...ingham-county/

These damn liberals, getting sick of the communist bas'terds. The gun laws have done nothing. Like Duci said, the criminals and gangs will get guns or ammo elsewhere

We need our media to want to hear our message.


The only one I ever saw do something on libs with guns was Fox, in a very tasteful and non offending piece.

It was in between them loving Palin, and endorsing Bachmann, so I kinda tuned out. But the piece was well done, and showed they can do non partisan pieces.

MSNBC/CNN Still waiting.

Just one non partisan skewed segment...Just one. Liberal press plays defense constantly. Rachel Maddow is the last liberal with balls, the rest are neutered or scared of Bill O rielly or Hannity (Big Hannity fan here) Love Redeye too.