SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   A film makers take on why the Moon landings were impossible to fake (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=206392)

mako88sb 08-06-13 03:32 PM

A film makers take on why the Moon landings were impossible to fake
 
I haven't a clue about the specifics of what he's talking about but it's great to see him explain it all in a way that even I can understand:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGXTF6bs1IU

Jarrah White who I'm sure some are familiar with made a video to counter some of this. Here's the response and again, he does a brilliant job:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TelJ75pzP4

Rhodes 08-06-13 06:12 PM

Nice! Thanks!:up:

mapuc 08-06-13 06:45 PM

Thank you for the share.

I for one truly believe USA have been on the moon.

This belief have had it's torn now and then.

Markus

Wolferz 08-06-13 07:41 PM

Those who think it was a hoax can abide by their opinions but, it happened. I witnessed the whole thing on TV, back when TV was honest in its reporting.
Mister Collins makes a good case regarding the tech available at that time and he's right. There is no way any of it could have been faked. The first television camera they set up on the moon was burned out when they inadvertently turned it toward the sun. Good thing there was a backup available or we wouldn't have witnessed anything other than astronaut home movies upon their return. That would have given the hoaxsayers plenty of ammo.:ping:
And of course we couldn't see any stars in the video feed. Can we see the moon during the day here on Earth, except during certain phases? Can we see stars during the day? The moon is always up there every day, as are the stars. They just get washed out by intense sunlight. Sunlight on the moon is much much brighter due to lack of atmo. Earth shows up in the lunar sky because it's a very brightly reflective planet.

Rhodes 08-07-13 05:12 AM

As the author of the video explains, many of the hoax/conspiracy theorists do not have knowledge of photography or video! Many night photos that on takes, we do not see the stars, due to the exposition time.
I also laugh when during the reply video,the person that had made the refute for the first video says that 16mm film is used in TV and 35mm in cinema.

Jimbuna 08-07-13 05:42 AM

Confirms what I have always believed...it did happen.

Schroeder 08-07-13 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimbuna (Post 2096345)
Confirms what I have always believed...it did happen.

No, no, no, no ,no! He's part of the conspiracy (he even gets a cheque from NASA at the end of the video!).:nope:
They have removed all the secret equipment which was very well able to fake that in 1969 and let it disappear in a even more secret hangar in area 51 (together with all the people they considered a risk)!

Don't be fooled!
(did anybody see my tinfoil hat?:hmm2:)

Herr-Berbunch 08-07-13 08:07 AM

If it was real how come they didn't bump into the Nazis living there? Eh? Eh? Answer that one, knowitalls! :D

Wolferz 08-07-13 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Herr-Berbunch (Post 2096398)
If it was real how come they didn't bump into the Nazis living there? Eh? Eh? Answer that one, knowitalls! :D

Yeah yeah,
If we answer that question, then you'll want to see the space suits covered with lunar cheese.:hmmm:

danasan 08-07-13 09:00 AM

This documentation prooves the fact that the USA was on the moon... a bit late... :D

Jimbuna 08-07-13 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Herr-Berbunch (Post 2096398)
If it was real how come they didn't bump into the Nazis living there? Eh? Eh? Answer that one, knowitalls! :D

Come to think of it they never found that WWII bomber either :hmm2:

antikristuseke 08-07-13 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimbuna (Post 2096434)
Come to think of it they never found that WWII bomber either :hmm2:

Sunday Sport refrence?

Also if the moon landing was real, how do you explain the dead unicorns?

Schroeder 08-07-13 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by antikristuseke (Post 2096454)
Sunday Sport refrence?

Also if the moon landing was real, how do you explain the dead unicorns?

The North Koreans ate them!:yep:

Jimbuna 08-07-13 12:07 PM

http://www.freeloljokes.com/products...oon%20also.jpg

Rhodes 08-07-13 12:10 PM

That's a fake! Every one knows that in 1969 there were no Photoshop!

mapuc 08-07-13 01:15 PM

As written before I truly believe, but it have had it's moment were I have had a very little doubt.

Here's one of them and it's from a danish science program called "Viden Om" = About Science.

This time it was about sending human to Mars

Here is what she said: (I can almost remember every word)

"Before we send the humans to Mars, we have to solve the problem getting through the Van Allen Belt, we haven't solved that problem yet"
Then she talked about this radiations in this belt.

When she said those words my brain started to boil(not literally of course)

From what I know you have to pass this belt, if you want to put a man on the Moon.

I came to this result. The people behind this program haven't done it's research or this belt is further out in space.

Markus

August 08-07-13 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhodes (Post 2096533)
That's a fake! Every one knows that in 1969 there were no Photoshop!

No foot prints around the astronaut either. :o

mako88sb 08-07-13 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mapuc (Post 2096579)
As written before I truly believe, but it have had it's moment were I have had a very little doubt.

Here's one of them and it's from a danish science program called "Viden Om" = About Science.

This time it was about sending human to Mars

Here is what she said: (I can almost remember every word)

"Before we send the humans to Mars, we have to solve the problem getting through the Van Allen Belt, we haven't solved that problem yet"
Then she talked about this radiations in this belt.

When she said those words my brain started to boil(not literally of course)

From what I know you have to pass this belt, if you want to put a man on the Moon.

I came to this result. The people behind this program haven't done it's research or this belt is further out in space.

Markus


Every mission to the moon involved going through the belts but despite what some "experts" claim, this is not as difficult as they would like you to believe. I don't know all the details but from what I've read, the design of the capsule was perfectly adequate to shield them from the worst of any radiation hazard. Also, the amount of time spent in the actual belts was a fraction of the time required to cause any lasting harm.

mako88sb 08-07-13 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by danasan (Post 2096413)
This documentation prooves the fact that the USA was on the moon... a bit late... :D

I never did see that. So how many V-2's did it take to get them to the moon?

Platapus 08-07-13 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolferz (Post 2096218)
The first television camera they set up on the moon was burned out when they inadvertently turned it toward the sun.

I am pretty sure that happened on Apollo 12. When Bean accidentally pointed the Westinghouse color TV camera at the sun while repositioning it after about 40 minutes of use.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_TV_camera


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.