What if- A nuclear thought
 

Last night I saw World War two-in colours, last episode.

In this episode that was about the war in the pacific and the use of nuclear weapon against Japan-A thought came up-What if we had devoloped the nuclear weapon before World war 2

1. Would the war have started?
2 If yes, when in the war, would the weapon have been used ?
3 if yes on both point, wich side would use it first ?

I didn't came longer that to number one. Would Germany have attacked Poland if they new that England had nuclear weapon? Or would the relay on the air defence if such an attack would occur?

Markus

If the Second World War was a nuclear one, I don't know who would have dropped the first bomb. Somebody would have done it eventually, and so London would probably look like this today:

http://creativefan.com/files/2010/12...14-500x312.jpg

And Tokyo:

http://www.pinktentacle.com/images/neo_ruins_3.jpg

Moscow:

http://xaxor.com/images/other/111199...ons_640_02.jpg

Neal on his way to work:

http://kloipy.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/madmax.jpg


Me on my way to work:

http://moviesmedia.ign.com/movies/im...634774-000.jpg

Glad it didn't turn out that way.

Me too, look what the radiation did to me! Well, at least Mel Gibson is there to keep me safe.


.

Both sides in Europe didn't use Chem/Bio weapons because of the threat of mutual retaliation.

Japan refused to use them on the US because of the same. (can't be said about them an China).

I don't think they would have been eager to use them, and by the time they were desperate enough to try delivery would have been highly difficult if not impossible. (and I discount use of missiles as delivery systems because of the limited payload of the V2 at the time.)

I was laughing for a good five minutes at that.:har:

nobody wins WW3

If it's nuclear. If it were conventional, it might have victors.

Well lets put it like this just before things started to go bad for Adolf an he got pissed off maybe he would have pushed the button first before he topped himself :hmmm:

:rotfl2::rotfl2::rotfl2:

Depends who has nukes. Everyone or just a few nations?

Nukes are not some kind of silver bullet, there delivery methods are quite conventional. There was a reason we built 32,000 of the things (and its not that Russia was a big country). We did not expect a large number to make it to their targets.

We have had ABM systems since the 1960s. ASATs were deployed in the USAF a year after Sputnik.

The "Star Wars" weapons of Reagan's era were very nearly a reality.

The reason these were not developed was political.

With the threat of a real nuclear war working countermeasures could quickly be deployed (not counting an "out of the blue" type of attack by the guy with a single bomb).

If we are talking about a WWII with nuclear weapons than both sides would have some kind of countermeasures already. If one side has ballistic missiles, the other side would be developing ABMs. If one side has high altitude bombers than the other side would be developing interceptors or SAMs, boomers; hunter-killers and so on.

It depends what we are talking about nuke-wise. I am not sure about missile delivered nukes as WW2 era missiles would be unreliable in a nuke war. Nukes dropped from bombers would probably be the main form of delivery.

Just to clear things out-Both side have nuclear weapons and both side have developed rocket(V2)

Markus

Vould be vonderful:D

MEIN FUHRER! I CAN WALK!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdRo7okHCAc&feature=fvst

Well a V-2's payload is about 3000 kg too low to carry a 1st generation atomic bomb.

They would have to be delivered by bomber.

Well there were the Junkers JU 290 and 390, and the Messerschmidt ME 264 V1-3.
http://www.militaryfactory.com/image...ircraft_id=759
Along with the ****e-Wulf FW 200 all four-engined bombers, however there would not have been much chances - even if it would have bombed the US with whatever bomb, it would never have brought he US to an armistice with that action.

Also, the german nuclear project was hindered by a never openly outspoken agreement of the partaking scientists, they just did not want to develop that thing for Hitler. Heisenberg writes about it in his autobiography.
Certainly, had von Braun been in that project ... :-?

edit: ****e-Wulf ? lol PC goes a bit far :)

Greetings,
Catfish

German nuclear project was hopelessly behind and clueless.
According to interrogations of spome German scientists.

There's a rumour that Germany had a reactor but it didn't go critical right, or something like that, but basically after it failed miserably they didn't try again before the war ended.

They had a kind of reactor (not intended to go critical) but only late in the war, and enough uranium. A good part of it had been tried to be shipped to Japan, but the U-234 carrying it surrendered to US forces. There are rumours that the US only got enough uranium for their (second?) bomb with the capture of this boat, but i'm not sure about that.

Heisenberg worked with Otto Hahn and Friedrich von Weizsaecker on a "Plutonium bomb", and found out that it would take 2-5 years for a development with lacking resources and needed centrifuges (so too late for the war anyway), but concealed to Speer that there was another method of chemical separation, of the 235 and 238 fractions. The physicists secretly agreed to not develop it for the Nazis.

From the german Wiki:
"Arbeit am Nuklearprogramm

Zu Beginn des Zweiten Weltkriegs wurden er und andere Physiker (zum Beispiel Otto Hahn und Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker) in das Heereswaffenamt berufen. Ihre Aufgabe im Rahmen des Uranprojektes sollte sein, Einsatzmöglichkeiten der Kernspaltung zu finden. Heisenberg stieß zwar erst relativ spät zu dem Projekt, arbeitete jedoch intensiv daran und übernahm bald eine führende Rolle.

Er und seine Kollegen kamen schon früh zu dem Schluss, dass die aufwändige Anreicherung des Spaltstoffes Uran 235 mit den allgemein zur Verfügung stehenden Ressourcen während der voraussichtlichen Restdauer des Krieges nicht zu machen war, und informierten dahingehend am 4. Juni 1942 Albert Speer.

Allerdings verschwiegen sie (oder sprachen davon nur in Andeutungen) die Möglichkeit, eine Plutoniumbombe zu bauen, bei der die Trennung viel einfacher chemisch ablaufen konnte und für die nur ein Natururan-Reaktor mit Schwerwasser als Moderator erforderlich war (ähnlich wie zum Beispiel der heutige kanadische Candu-Reaktortyp, mit dessen Hilfe Indien in den Besitz von Kernwaffen kam).

Auf die entscheidende Frage Speers, wie lange sie für eine Bombe bräuchten, gab er drei bis fünf Jahre an ***8211; womit das Projekt seine Priorität verlor.

Im weiteren Verlauf arbeiteten die deutschen Kernphysiker nur noch an einem Schwerwasserreaktor, der am Ende des Krieges ins schwäbische Haigerloch ausgelagert wurde. In den Experimenten der letzten Kriegstage, drei Jahre nach der erfolgreichen Inbetriebnahme eines Graphit-moderierten Reaktors durch Enrico Fermi in Chicago, gelang es beinahe, den Forschungsreaktor Haigerloch kritisch werden zu lassen. "


The autobiography of Heisenberg is well worth a read -

Greetings,
Catfish