Mayor Bloomberg is an idiot and dangerous
 

I just can not see where this guy gets off, he really is a dangerous fool.NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg is showing his dictatorial tendencies yet again in trying to push a ban on "large sized" soda, tea etc in NYC in order to fight the obesity problem.Sounds like a decent plan but this is yet another affront to one's freedom of choice in the Big Apple, people have the right to chose if the business offers it.Bloomberg pretends to be an "independent" but is nothing more than a left wing hack, given his hatred of the 2nd amendment rights, really shows what a dangerous fool this man is.Hope NYC is smart enough to get rid of him soon.

No Obama? I am disappoint... :wah:

Okay. But if I am in the same insurance pool as you, I do not see why it should be my burden to pay for your lifestyle choices. If someone's poor diet and lack of exercise resulted in heart disease, I do not see it as my responsibility to help pay for their blood pressure medication. Dangerous fools indeed.

I read it today. 2007, 1 in 8 New Yorkers had diabetes. Today, 1 in 2 is suffering from obesiety, which also produces high costs to the health system.

I claim that white refined sugar does more damage to the health system and people's health, than tobacco or alcohgol or drugs. Beside salt (in to huge quanties) and bad fats, it is one of the three major poisons you can legally buy in supermarkets today. Where the problem is not so much the substance in itself (although white sugar NEVER is healthy or needed by your body, the body naturally needs other forms of sugars), but the immense overdose by which it is consumed.

So, for once I must agree with this food regulation. If you drink soft drinks in huge quantities, then this is a problem. For your body. And for the finances of the health system. And the people needing to watch you when you are too fat - from some size on it is no pleasant view anymore, really. From some size on, it is an offence to the eye.

Damn, now I said something unpolite again. I'm so sorry.

I'm sorry; I was drinking my Super Big Gulp and I wasn't paying attention... :D

...

If this went ahead on a larger scale would it mean less government subsidies being spent on making people fat?

Has he defined what drinks fall under this "Large sized" sodas ban?

But tobacco and alcohol products can still be sold.:doh:

If the goal is to control that which causes higher health risks/health costs, I would imagine there are other areas of higher priority.

While the intention is laudable, the government should not be taking this action.

Note the day: 31May12. Bubblehead and I are in agreement. :up:

This just in:

Pigs suddenly sprout wings;

Blizzards in Hades;

Cubs win World Series;

Proctologits report finding monkeys;

More as it develops...

...

Sugar is the most underestimated risk factor. I rate it as more damaging to health costs than tobacco or alcohol or drugs.

Drink sizes greater than 478 ml (16 onc) that use no sweeter but sugar: coffee, soft drinks, tea, "fruit" juice - if they use sugar.

Pardon. I must always laugh when I am in a supermarket and see those "fruit" juices. Most are more liquidised candy than "fruit". :DL

Problem: Large sized sodas banned.

Solution: Buy more than one.:D

Depending on unit price you might wind up getting more sugar for less money by buying two smaller sodas vs. one large one.

Skybird is right about most "juices" sold in stores they are really flavored sugar more or less.

Those measures wont solve much people will either buy the more than one item to get more than 16 oz or they will use a lot of those sugar packets.

Now you are just being unrealistic. :D

None of these regulations work, cept get all the junk food out of schools since they're tax dollars. Heck, kids today hardly have gym, our gym teachers exercised the mess out of us.

They say disease related to obesiety in the next 20 years will triple the cost of medicare/caid....and it's already trillions in debt.

Why they need to keep pot illegal, makes you eat and legalize crack that makes you skinny...:O:

Glad have seen the light.:arrgh!:

As an out-of-shape guy, I agree. Insurance should be scaled on risk. And as a motorcycle guy with little patience for slow-arsed cars, I'm probably in the top risk bracket :(

But I may cut back on the snacks if my insurance tripled.

Great. More objective and unbiased appraisals from the forum sage.

Terms and conditions apply.
In fact on one part its pretty similar terms and conditions covering size content and location.

See its a win win situation, if people still want to guzzle 64oz of HFCS sweetened crap they have to walk back to the counter for a refill or three.
The mayor is simply encouraging exercise for the extrasized.

The main problem here is simply government subsidies of corn farming which is used to produce high fructose corn syrup, making sweets cheaper that they ought to be, and preventing farmers from switching to more healthier crops...

I have nothing against this ban, but I don't think it will help. I do bellieve in a high suger tax to let the sugar happy people pay for their own hospitalization.

I am often amazed at how much power people are willing to give to the government, just makes me shake my head in shame that this way of thinking has managed to become fairly common in this country.Some blowhard like Bloomberg does not know what is best for every individual , but of course people like him do not care about individuality, it's all about the "collective", people like Bloomberg are dangerous.Cola in moderation does no harm, BUT that is an individual choice, to have a small or large, no government entity should be able to limit that and force a business to no offer the size customers want.Like I said, if the business chose to make 16 oz their largest serving, fine, they can suffer the revenue loss, but the government has no role here, once again a huge overreach from government.I have enjoyed my visits to NYC but their nanny state there is astounding, all the cameras etc in the name of "security" and of course the sheeple mostly play along.Really hope Bloomberg never runs for the Presidency, with all his money he would prob have a shot, what a dangerous A hole of a President he would be, most likely more dangerous than the one we have now.