Obama has polticized past President biographies
 

There is a page for every US president on the official White House website and Obamas campaign team has added comments about him to every one dating back to Calvin Coolidge.

Take the one for Hoover:


Here's the one for Ike:

Is there anything this guy won't take credit for? Are there any shoulders he won't jump on top trumpet his vision of personal greatness?

Check it out yourself at:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/about/presidents

Do it while listening to this song: Cult of personality

Really lame way to link your self there Obama. :roll:


Meanwhile at Republican Party Headquarters.

Before I pull out the pitchfork and torch, i have a couple questions:

- Has this been done before with previous presidents?
- Is it just the website were talking about?

Both are good questions that I do not have the answers for Duc. But I suspect that if George had done it too it would have been severely lambasted in the MSM to the point that few of us wouldn't know the answer to at least the first one.

MSN was probably too busy having a cow over Bush's umpteen signing statements to notice if he had.


All i can say without any evidence is:
IF....
- this hasn't been done before
- said descriptions in physical official locations were also altered (web site content is organic in nature and always changes)

Then this is a real freaking LOW attempt at coat tail riding. EDIT: Hell, altering plaques in real locations is something youd see in the DPRK, which makes this even worse.


However, IF
- This has been done before,
- and it's just the website that's been altered,

Then this is politics as usual, and worthy only of rolling eyes. Yeah, still low, but not a new low that wasn't already established. All politicians are scumbags anyway.

Definitely a bad idea, regardless of if he was or wasn't the first to do it.

Amen to this...

In the end, nothing new to see here, move along now...

http://chzallnighter.files.wordpress...along-sign.jpg

...

If he had the descrptions changed in real world locations outside of the website, that is some SERIOUS shennigans though. That cannot be allowed, period. I think its a safe bet this hasn't taken place, but if it had..... That is reason to be SERIOUSLY angry. I've been ambivalent about him, don't really care, but that would tilt me to outright rage in 0.5 seconds.

Well even if the answer to one or both of those questions is no the precedent has now been set.

Oh and from the website:

I think it is awesome. He is a stand up guy. I can wait for the next book. :up:

:doh: Excuse me Mr. President but I don't think so...

Wait for the edits to the Constitution coming out this fall!!! :yeah:

Anything to divert attention from the economy......:shifty:

Frankly, I'm waing for the GOP to start talking about specifics...

"Job Creators", stimulus, "trickle-down", tax cuts for the highest earners, bulk de-regulation, all the other trite vagaries that have failed before (sveral times) just won't cut it; if the GOP seriously wants to win, it has to get some common sense, deliver specific ideas and abandon that which hsa not worked under past GOP administrations...

pat attention to the voters' needs not the lobbyist's...

(...and, yes I know, "the other side does it too" [boo, hoo]; well, the GOP ought to grow a pair and try to be the first to break the mold...)

...

The GOP is full of crap also. Honestly. All within the confines of DC "running" the country have failed miserably. The finger pointing will go on and nothing will get done.

I'm not quite comprehending the signficance of that. Being a little slow on the uptake today, maybe you can explain?

This a book? and what is the affliation of White House Historical Association? They linked to the government somehow, or just some civillian assocation?

Yeah personally ive never heard much in the way of specifics from the GOP. I hear much in the way of platitudes and hyperbole, but not much else.

All (left and right) of DC is full of crap, and their all on the special interest take as far as im concerned.

This may be the first time with a website, but it's hardly the first time ever. I have a small book called Who Were The Founding Fathers? I had thought it would be an in-depth study on the major players, but instead I was very pleasantly surprised. The first chapter is what the founders wrote about themselves and each other. The second is what the next generation wrote about them and so-on.

Review:
http://www.amazon.com/Who-Were-Found...7197984&sr=1-1

It's not always pretty. You might be amazed at how each succeeding generation of politicians and pundits have tried to use their predecessors for their own slanted purposes.

Ok, so this is politics as usual then.

So these are by a branch of the parks service keeping up to date information on the white house and its history and of the two authors one also worked there under Bush in the same job and one was appointed to the job during the first term of Bush.:yawn:

Hasn't anyone got a "gripping" Daily Mail headline to post about?:rotfl2: