SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Your turn America (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=191218)

Oberon 01-05-12 11:47 AM

Your turn America
 
We've had our mass-culling, now it's your turn.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-16430405

Still, on the up side, at least you have plenty of reserve stuff that you can cull, we ran out of that during the 1990s. :damn:

GoldenRivet 01-05-12 11:50 AM

no surprises there

Herr-Berbunch 01-05-12 11:59 AM

Just sell off everything at Davis-Monthan either for scrap or servicable, don't just leave it all there. :nope:

That should cut a hole in the red!

Schroeder 01-05-12 12:00 PM

What good is a huge army if you can't pay for it? Just look at the red army after the wall came down. Tons of equipment and everything in awful shape. That can't be the answer either, can it?

GoldenRivet 01-05-12 12:40 PM

he's treating the a symptom... not curing the ailment just like they have all done and will do until there is nothing left

Ducimus 01-05-12 12:55 PM

Quote:

So yes, our military will be leaner," Mr Obama told reporters, "but the world must know - the United States is going to maintain our military superiority with armed forces that are agile, flexible and ready for the full range of contingencies and threats."
He sounds like F'ing Rumsfeld.

Edit:
As long as were downsizing (again), i still say, lets yank all those cold war era bases we have dotted all over the damn place that are doing nothing but supporting local economies. Bring some of them back stateside to support our own local economies for a change.

soopaman2 01-05-12 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ducimus (Post 1815919)
He sounds like F'ing Rumsfeld.

Edit:
As long as were downsizing (again), i still say, lets yank all those cold war era bases we have dotted all over the damn place that are doing nothing but supporting local economies. Bring some of them back stateside to support our own local economies for a change.

It always amazes me how we need bases in Germany, but can't afford a space program or social programs for seniors that "need to be cut".

It is common sense for the citizen, but unspeakable for our politicians who are fed by the defense lobbies.

You know what they call "lobbying" in Europe?

Bribery.

Tribesman 01-05-12 01:51 PM

Does this mean the Chagos Islanders can have their land back?

magicstix 01-05-12 01:59 PM

The easiest way to fix the defense budget would be to cut out all the waste and fraud, but instead we have a President that has decided to hamstring our ability to fight two wars at a time when both China and Iran are acting more belligerent on the world stage. :-?

Schroeder 01-05-12 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soopaman2 (Post 1815923)
It always amazes me how we need bases in Germany, but can't afford a space program or social programs for seniors that "need to be cut".

It is common sense for the citizen, but unspeakable for our politicians who are fed by the defense lobbies.

You know what they call "lobbying" in Europe?

Bribery.

You are aware that the airbase in Frankfurt is your main hub for transportation for Iraq and Afghanistan (at least IIRC)?
So some of those bases are of strategic value when you go into other foreign lands again.;)

magicstix 01-05-12 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schroeder (Post 1815968)
You are aware that the airbase in Frankfurt is your main hub for transportation for Iraq and Afghanistan (at least IIRC)?
So some of those bases are of strategic value when you go into other foreign lands again.;)

Most people who whine about US forward deployment bases have little understanding of our military strategy. ;P

soopaman2 01-05-12 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schroeder (Post 1815968)
You are aware that the airbase in Frankfurt is your main hub for transportation for Iraq and Afghanistan (at least IIRC)?
So some of those bases are of strategic value when you go into other foreign lands again.;)

Yes you are right, Rammstein AFB I think it is. (IIRC)


Maybe we have no bussiness in foreign lands with so many of our own hurting. The basic American thinks fiddling about in the ME is bullstuff (schiesse)
Germany is strong, they do not need us anymore. My people need us, not yours, not the French, not English, not Afghani.

Xenophobic no. Isolationist? Perhaps. Or maybe just feel we should be as self absorbed as anyone else.

Europe is strong. Let them bear some of the weight.

Catfish 01-05-12 02:52 PM

I think 450 billion dollars for the military in one year is not exactly "lean" ?
How much was it before, or are those only the "defence" costs not including offensive .. err .. hardware ?
600 billion for anti terror, additionally. National Defense [sic!] Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationa...scal_Year_2012
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=48574
http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain...-act-now-what/

This building of US interrogation campps all over the world basically undermines international law, it seems no one has even noticed that yet. And even without that i feel it is a serious blow against freedom in the US itself.

kraznyi_oktjabr 01-05-12 03:02 PM

I noticed this nice comparison of military forces from BBC page: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-16428133 (I know its a bit simplified).

Some highlights:
UK $63.7bn, 174,000 personnel
Russia $52.7bn, 956,000 personnel
I know that Russia has conscription, lower material costs (fuel, food etc.) and so on but still that comparison doesn't make sense.

USA $739.3bn, 1,569,000 personnel
China $89.9bn, 2,285,000 personnel
I agree with small print (below comparison table) that China's official military budget figure is nonsense. It can't be that low.

soopaman2 01-05-12 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kraznyi_oktjabr (Post 1816005)
I noticed this nice comparison of military forces from BBC page: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-16428133 (I know its a bit simplified).

Some highlights:
UK $63.7bn, 174,000 personnel
Russia $52.7bn, 956,000 personnel
I know that Russia has conscription, lower material costs (fuel, food etc.) and so on but still that comparison doesn't make sense.

USA $739.3bn, 1,569,000 personnel
China $89.9bn, 2,285,000 personnel
I agree with small print (below comparison table) that China's official military budget figure is nonsense. It can't be that low.

But for the USA to cut back, would force Europe to step up. As of now Europe cannot afford to step up.

Costs not included in that figure is the USAs UN funding, which we provide a lions share of the funding and ground troops for.

In all fairness Europe has not paid its fair share since 1945. Your cities are not bombed out anymore. and alot of your countries are doing better than us.

Some help?

Not being mean, or "arrogant American man", just saying from a rational standpoint.

(pardon my bluntness)

.
Yes China will always lie. Sun Tzu always did preach deception, it was a running topic in his Art of War.

Ducimus 01-05-12 03:52 PM

Well, we kinda sorta anointed ourselves as the Worlds Policeman. The reasons of which im not sure, but probably have their roots in the Cold War. At any rate, we've been kind of lingering here as the Worlds Policeman. Times change, people change, maybe that will change too.

edit: Personally id welcome it if we were to long longer be "The Worlds Policeman". I didn't always enjoy being in some 2nd or 3rd world hell hole, presumably for the benefit of some people that i could give less then a (bleep) about.

edit: and I don't mean the American people. In the end, nothing i did mattered where the US people are concerned.

Rockstar 01-05-12 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soopaman2 (Post 1816017)
But for the USA to cut back, would force Europe to step up. As of now Europe cannot afford to step up.


Step up to what? Nobody, not even the Red Menace has the cash to start or support a major conflict.

Herr-Berbunch 01-05-12 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribesman (Post 1815961)
Does this mean the Chagos Islanders can have their land back?

Don't you mean back to the British, and then we can hand it back. And if we can say it was all our idea and come away with some dignity, all the better. :-?

Kongo Otto 01-05-12 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soopaman2 (Post 1816017)
But for the USA to cut back, would force Europe to step up. As of now Europe cannot afford to step up.

The question is what do you mean exactly with "step up"? The times of big Tank and Infantry Armies are over, todays asymetrical warfare needs highly mobile special forces. Then the question arise for what purpose should those European Nations step up their military?
Quote:

Originally Posted by soopaman2 (Post 1816017)
In all fairness Europe has not paid its fair share since 1945. Your cities are not bombed out anymore. and alot of your countries are doing better than us.

Oh realy? may i remind you about the British Army and the Greeks who fought with the US together in Korea? And how about Desert Strom and Afgahnistan? Ah i forgot you fight your wars always alone.
I found it rather funny, that the Americans who told us Germans that we Germans are such bad militarists for the last 75 years, are now demanding a step up. Why should we? we dont have a Problem with the Iranians, not to mention what the reasons for you Iranian Problem are. Does it realy make you wonder that these people hate you, after you financed one of the most sinister villains (aka Mohammad Reza Pahlavi) down there for decades. It had a reasons why Khomeini came back to Iran back in 1979.
Quote:

Originally Posted by soopaman2 (Post 1816017)
Yes China will always lie. Sun Tzu always did preach deception, it was a running topic in his Art of War.

Show me a politician whos not lying and i show you an idiot. :03:

nikimcbee 01-06-12 02:10 AM

Okay, if we're cutting the military, let's start with all the bases in the blue states.:haha:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.