![]() |
Euro falls on rumours Greece is to quit the eurozone
The euro has fallen by more than 1% against the dollar, following a report that Greece had raised the possibility of leaving the single currency.
German magazine Der Spiegel said eurozone finance ministers were holding a crisis meeting in Luxembourg. The report has been denied vigorously by eurozone countries, including Greece and Germany. However, the BBC has learned that ministers from four eurozone countries are indeed meeting in Luxembourg. The countries - France, Germany, Finland and Netherlands - are said to be discussing EU issues, including the financial situation of Portugal, Ireland and Greece. "The report about Greece leaving the eurozone is untrue," the Greek deputy finance minister Filippos Sachinidis told Reuters. "Such reports undermine Greece and the euro and serve market speculation games." http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-13317770 Note: 6 May 2011 Last updated at 18:45 GMT |
I'm glad we have a strong SEK, to lean to, :yep:
|
hey vendor, so are you going to go to Denmark to spend your money?
Its what us Canadians often do, we go to the states to go shopping |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This week has been the beginning of the end of the eurozone and maybe even EU. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm not saying that's a good thing though, just an observation. If there's too much depending on an institution - be it a bank, or the monetary EU in this case - it will never collapse. This is a time where we should rethink and redesign capitalism, but I see too little changes.... Anyway, I'm back to my movie :cool: |
Quote:
It is all the same as the end result is the same, Greece will default and restructure its debts. The same goes for Ireland and Portugal. After that Spain, Belgium, Italy and France..:woot: The reason that Netherlands and Finland are also present is that they are part of the triple A credit rated countries. Probably EU comission asking us to pump more loans on this bubble.:nope: |
You're probably right, but don't you think the Finnish or Dutch would pour money into it without getting anything back?
|
Quote:
Maybe the transfer union will collapse indeed, but not in the forseeable future, political stupidity still is too determined to keep the illujsion alive, no matter the cost. Maybe after Germany has been successfully brought down by transfering billions and billions and billions while accumulating it's own debt burden and deficits. What many people overlook is that in Germany the decisive treshhold criterions for state debts beyond which most economists and historians agree a state can never recover but instead falls into an accellerating spiral - has already been exceeded longer time ago. Germany has a debt burden of over 2 trillion now (http://www.staatsverschuldung.de/schuldenuhr.htm ) Roughly 30% of that was accumulated in the past 24 months. Early 2008, Germany was on the way towards an at least balanced budget, no new debts. Currently, the budget has a deficit of 3.8%, with a dramatic dependence of German economy on good exports and energy imports (at least the first being a showstopper in the long run). Since social cuts are not popular with politicians and the left is in a up-pohase over here, I fear that the future will hold higher and higher taxes, and growing spendings alike, which more and more translates into exporioriation over here. Adding open taxes (Einkommenssteuer, sozialabgaben etc) and hidden consumer taxes (Mehrwertsteuer etc) taxes altogether, most of the ordinary middle class employees have to pay already two thirds of their income to the state, not just those roughly 48% that usually are quoted by excluding the hidden taxes. Damn, I realise how many of those English economic vocabulary terms I am missing. Some numbers on public and external debts and GDPs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...by_public_debt http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of..._external_debt |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
And that is what it does, whether one likes it or not |
Quote:
Finland and Netherlands would have done just as well outside EU and Euro. |
Seems im not the only one calling it a Ponzi scheme.:up:
Europe is running a giant Ponzi scheme http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ee728cb6-7...#axzz1LdP1ujJY |
Quote:
|
Quote:
James said it is only the market, I assume he meant "free market", whcih I claim does not exist anyway. Even a currency of a truly free market gets manipulated outside market mechanism by the eabove factors, or by speculations that hold no ground. It just has happened in Europe: the ECB refused to react to high prices for oil and precious metals, which were hyped in the past months by speculations becasue they hoped for high profits from overpricing when the ECB was expected to protect it. After the ECB denied that phrase that was expected, the porices went nose down and the dollar value went nose up, the Euro lost 2 cents within minutes after the prerss conference, and still is there. Which is better than the status before. Speculation is the bone cancer of financial systems like ours. Quote:
The ideological basis and orientation of this Federal states project, as well as the obvious lack of citizen'S legitimation getting requested for it, is what defines the EU as an ursupator of powers and an ideological tyranny, and more and more often a tyranny by laws and rules that have nothing, really nothing to do with economics indeed. The EU naturally claims the right to dicatte the elected soveriegn parliaments of nations what they have to do and what not. More than 80% of the laws passed by the German parliament, are laws demanded by the EU, which just get waved through. The parliament villates the constitution of our country that rules that it shall do not right this: just waving things through, but to check and analyse them - and rejecting them wshen they are not for the good of Germany or are anti-constitutional. But it seems the EU is given immunity from this check. The obvious big deficits in transparency, the lack of democratically given legitimation and the enormous private lobbyism interfering with and manipulating decision making in Brussel, has often been described and must not be explained once again, I think. To hell with the EU. How precious it is you can see that indeed only its economic actions are being taken into account by others outside of it. But its ideological claims and ideas - the simple truth is all others are laughing about it, and nobody takes it serious, and some make best material profit by abusing it. Let there be economic coordination and cooperation, that is the best factor to maxcimise the chances for peace and stability. Beyond that, one should kick the EU's butt and give it a bloody nose whenever it sticks its nose into things that must not be its interest at all and for which to do it has zero legitimation by the people of Europe. But their are careers in the circus, and payments and psoitons to be defended, and earnings, and operetta titles and operetta glamour events - politicians will defend the EU with fangs and claws, because they are personally benefitting from it in so many ways, it gives them money and prestige and privileges. That is not the EU I tolerate. Nor is that the EU that was wanted when it was founded. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.