Swedish Military 'not interested' in Soviet sub wreck
 

Never heard of this before, Didnt even know they found it 2 years ago.

Interesting nonetheless!

http://www.thelocal.se/32386/20110303/

did Vendor give directions to a submarine crew again? :O:

very interesting, indeed! I wonder that nobody thinks of potential (enviromental) hazards which the boat could cause...

here you'll find a short video, it shows only the con tower most of the time however: http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/article8653356.ab

:nope: he could have asked here...

"Andre...you've lost another sub?"

Wouldn't surprise me if it was a Whiskey, would certainly blow the lid off a can of worms that's been puzzling Sweden for a while. Perhaps that's why the military is in no rush to confirm its identity, I think they'd rather just put that era behind them and ignore it.

That photo is for sure a post WWII Soviet Sub, not some 1914 wreck. Very likely a Whiskey class.

If this sub wrecked I would be very curious if there is still crew aboard her, or if they rescued the crew of by DSRV or something.

For reference, it is a whisky :) Read it in a swedish paper.

It always interests me these wrecks that show no sign of what caused the sinking. To what purpose to investigate the sub?

To find out what did cause the sinking because its not obvious? :03:

Right because the news gets details like that right all the time. :O:

I edited my quote to make clear that the guy meant another boat he found earlier.
The sub looks very much like a Whiskey - check out the vid/pics of the tower from the articles.

My money would be on water, yes I am quite sure that flooding caused the sinking. :DL

But to what end? It is an old boat. It would seem the owners are not to much interested in what happened to their men. Perhaps it is best to let her lay in her silence.

Could have been a jam dive that caused her to get stuck in the mud and they couldn't get her out again with out a big noticeable salvage effort.

But is a part of history now. In 30 years she might be covered in mud and no one then will be able to find out what happened to her. If her crew died with her shouldn't the families learn the fate of them? In Soviet Russia they might not have been told that their submarine was lost at sea to cover up what happened.

Oh and since she was a Soviet sub she might have a couple of nuclear torpedoes aboard. Sub sunk in shallow waters + Nuclear Torpedoes = Tom Clancy Novel. :03:

Who cares? It's just another Soviet hunk of metal that employed state-of-the-art sinking technology. Any useful inteligence we could have gleaned from the design has long since been obtained by other means, and Sweden wouldn't have a use for such a thing, anyway.


I can understand that argument. History is history, regardless of the practical application, and it is probable that the Soviets covered the incident up, which would be why it is news today.


That would make for a good novel, and I stress the word novel. If there were nuclear torpedoes aboard, the Soviets would have long since recovered them, as ferarful as they were about NATO recovering their technology, and given their strict monitorign of their military assets.

Actually, now that I think about it, did the Whiskey-class even employ nuclear torpedoes? IIRC, the design pre-dated nuclear torpedoes, which would suggest that the tubes were not designed to accomadate purpose-built nuclear warheads, unless of course, the warheads could be fitted into a standard-diameter warhead or there was a redesign of the tubes.

I'm not sure and I'm probably wrong about that last paragraph. Please explain.

Ok how? send a recovery ship out to raise the sub? Nope. Send in divers and cut the sub open and remove the torpedoes. Maybe.

The Russians did have several 533mm nuclear torpedoes; the 53-58 (in service 1968), and they had a special warhead they could afix to a normal torpedo as needed even at sea (in service 1962).

Well,Well,interesting comments and conclusions,that newspapers have been given tips on.

Not to mention Whiskeys + nuclear tipped torpedoes + Sweden isn't entirely unheard of. I'm sure you remember whiskey on the rocks

One a different perspective,
 

I wouldn't worry about it. Finucan and Vendor have already cited sources for the Soviets being willing to overtly go to great lenghts to recover subs lost in Swedish waters. Given that, odds are that the Soviets didn't even know what happened to the sub, regardless of the payload, so my assessment was probably wrong. Sometimes I forget that these are Soviets we're talking about, here.


I had to look that one up, but you're right. Actually, I owe you a "thank you" because I was heretofore all but certain that the Whiskey-class used a smaller-diameter torpedo but I was totally wrong.

Stirred and shaken!:()1:

In order to make a statement like "not" in the data Swedish media announced yesterday and even earlier, on the current U-boat so she is well documented by Swedish authorities, there are several reasons why she is not currently admitted to surface, and the reasons are both political and lacks an initial interest when large parts of the Baltic Sea, consists of this type of u-boats,this is nothing extra ordinary.

"The Navy claims that pictures taken by the measurement company clearly show that the submarine had sunk while being towed (to be scrapped, it is assumed)"

A finnish businessman Jari Komulainen had a deal in the early 90'ies with russians to sell various old soviet boats to be used as museums and such. (The juliett that was used in the K-19 movie for example.)

This boat that was found in 2009 might be the one that was destined to be towed to England to become a museum there, but sunk while underway.

Jari Komulainen is a renowned businessman who has been involved in different projects, everything from movies to various settlements, but that this U-boat would have sunk after a purchase there, I am not likely, the sea is made up of different boats that have gone under.